Threading is Sticky

The Guardian ---the fifth most widely read online newspaper in the world as of 2014---changed conversations on its commenting platform by altering its design from non-threaded to single-level threaded in 2012. We studied this naturally occurring experiment to investigate the impact of conversation threading on user retention as mediated by several potential changes in conversation structure and style. Our analysis shows that the design change made new users significantly more likely to comment a second time, and that this increased stickiness is due in part to a higher fraction of comments receiving responses after the design change. In mediation analysis, other anticipated mechanisms such as reciprocal exchanges and comment civility did not help to explain users' decision to return to the commenting system; indeed, civility did not increase after the design change and reciprocity declined. These analyses show that even simple design choices can have a significant impact on news forums' stickiness. Further, they suggest that this influence is more powerfully shaped by affordances---the new system made responding easier---than by changes in users' attention to social norms of reciprocity or civility. This has an array of implications for designers.

[1]  Fabrício Benevenuto,et al.  Analyzing the Targets of Hate in Online Social Media , 2016, ICWSM.

[2]  Francesco Picciolo,et al.  Reciprocity of weighted networks , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[3]  R. Putnam Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[4]  Marc A. Smith,et al.  Visualization components for persistent conversations , 2001, CHI.

[5]  John Naughton,et al.  Anonymity and Online Commenting: The Broken Windows Effect and the End of Drive-by Commenting , 2015, WebSci.

[6]  K. Hazel Kwon,et al.  The impacts of identity verification and disclosure of social cues on flaming in online user comments , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Calvin Meng Lai Chan,et al.  Recognition and participation in a virtual community , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[8]  Rakesh Agrawal,et al.  On participation in group chats on Twitter , 2013, WWW.

[9]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Community Commitment: How Affect, Obligation, and Necessity Drive Online Behaviors , 2006, ICIS.

[10]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[11]  Ronald Baecker,et al.  Structuring and supporting persistent chat conversations , 2006, CSCW '06.

[12]  James W. Pennebaker,et al.  Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2007) , 2007 .

[13]  Deen Freelon,et al.  Discourse architecture, ideology, and democratic norms in online political discussion , 2015, New Media Soc..

[14]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Experiment 1 : Motivating Conversational Contributions Through Group Homogeneity and Individual Uniqueness , 2010 .

[15]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  The "Nasty Effect: " Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[16]  Coye Cheshire,et al.  The Social Psychological Effects of Feedback on the Production of Internet Information Pools , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  Eun-Ju Lee,et al.  That's Not the Way It Is: How User-Generated Comments on the News Affect Perceived Media Bias , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[18]  Kevin Wise,et al.  Moderation, Response Rate, and Message Interactivity: Features of Online Communities and Their Effects on Intent to Participate , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[19]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Increasing commitment to online communities by designing for social presence , 2011, CSCW.

[20]  Adrienne Massanari,et al.  #Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures , 2017, New Media Soc..

[21]  John Robinson,et al.  What’s There Not to ‘Like’? Sustainability Deliberations on Facebook , 2012 .

[22]  Marc Smith,et al.  Conversation trees and threaded chats , 2000, CSCW '00.

[23]  Nili Steinfeld,et al.  Promoting online deliberation quality: cognitive cues matter , 2014 .

[24]  Vicenç Gómez,et al.  To Thread or Not to Thread: The Impact of Conversation Threading on Online Discussion , 2017, ICWSM.

[25]  Matthew S. Fritz,et al.  Mediation analysis. , 2019, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  Joshua M. Scacco,et al.  Changing Deliberative Norms on News Organizations' Facebook Sites , 2015, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  Christiane Eilders,et al.  A Systematic Review of Online Deliberation Research , 2015 .

[28]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Flash forums and forumReader: navigating a new kind of large-scale online discussion , 2004, CSCW.

[29]  Tawanna Dillahunt,et al.  Understanding factors of successful engagement around energy consumption between and among households , 2014, CSCW.

[30]  Niklas Elmqvist,et al.  Supporting Comment Moderators in Identifying High Quality Online News Comments , 2016, CHI.

[31]  Petter Bae Brandtzæg,et al.  User loyalty and online communities: why members of online communities are not faithful , 2008, INTETAIN '08.

[32]  A AndersonAshley,et al.  The "Nasty Effect , 2014 .

[33]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Chat spaces , 2004, DIS '04.

[34]  Jürgen Pfeffer,et al.  Identifying Platform Effects in Social Media Data , 2016, ICWSM.

[35]  Alcides Velasquez,et al.  Motivations to participate in online communities , 2010, CHI.

[36]  Sean J. Taylor,et al.  Discussion Quality Diffuses in the Digital Public Square , 2017, WWW.

[37]  Diego Garlaschelli,et al.  Patterns of link reciprocity in directed networks. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[38]  John Riedl,et al.  SuggestBot: using intelligent task routing to help people find work in wikipedia , 2007, IUI '07.

[39]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[40]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  Embeddedness and sequentiality in social media , 2016, CSCW.

[41]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Follow the (slash) dot: effects of feedback on new members in an online community , 2005, GROUP.

[42]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments , 2014 .

[43]  Diana C. Mutz Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy , 2006 .

[44]  Ka-Ping Yee Zest: Discussion Mapping for Mailing Lists , 2002 .

[45]  Tian Chen,et al.  Introduction to mediation analysis with structural equation modeling , 2013, Shanghai archives of psychiatry.

[46]  T. Postmes,et al.  A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena , 1995 .

[47]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[48]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities , 2006, CHI.

[49]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Social influence: compliance and conformity. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[50]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Towards quality discourse in online news comments , 2011, CSCW.