A new methodology for automating acoustic emission detection of metallic fatigue fractures in highly demanding aerospace environments: An overview

The acoustic emission (AE) phenomenon has many attributes that make it desirable as a structural health monitoring or non-destructive testing technique, including the capability to continuously and globally monitor large structures using a sparse sensor array and with no dependency on defect size. However, AE monitoring is yet to fulfil its true potential, due mainly to limitations in location accuracy and signal characterisation that often arise in complex structures with high levels of background noise. Furthermore, the technique has been criticised for a lack of quantitative results and the large amount of operator interpretation required during data analysis. This paper begins by introducing the challenges faced in developing an AE based structural health monitoring system and then gives a review of previous progress made in addresing these challenges. Subsequently an overview of a novel methodology for automatic detection of fatigue fractures in complex geometries and noisy environments is presented, which combines a number of signal processing techniques to address the current limitations of AE monitoring. The technique was developed for monitoring metallic landing gear components during pre-flight certification testing and results are presented from a full-scale steel landing gear component undergoing fatigue loading. Fracture onset was successfully identify automatically at 49,000 fatigue cycles prior to final failure (validated by the use of dye penetrant inspection) and the fracture position was located to within 10 mm of the actual location.

[1]  W. H. Prosser,et al.  Advanced AE techniques in composite materials research , 1996 .

[2]  Karen Margaret Holford,et al.  Damage in carbon fibre composites: the discrimination of acoustic emission signals using frequency , 2007 .

[3]  Bc Lee,et al.  Lamb wave propagation modelling for damage detection: II. Damage monitoring strategy , 2007 .

[4]  Martine Wevers,et al.  Modal analysis of acoustic emission signals from CFRP laminates , 1999 .

[5]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  Quantitative structural health monitoring using acoustic emission , 2006, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[6]  Karen Margaret Holford,et al.  Damage classification in carbon fibre composites using acoustic emission: A comparison of three techniques , 2015 .

[7]  Bin Wu,et al.  Application of wavelet transform on modal acoustic emission source location in thin plates with one sensor , 2004 .

[8]  W. Staszewski,et al.  Modelling of Lamb waves for damage detection in metallic structures: Part II. Wave interactions with damage , 2003 .

[9]  Liu Xu-min,et al.  多スロープ応答及び画像再構成アルゴリズムを用いる高ダイナミックレンジ相補性金属‐酸化物‐半導体(CMOS)カメラ , 2009 .

[10]  Haolin Li,et al.  Acoustic emission signal processing of grinding monitor , 2010, 2010 3rd International Congress on Image and Signal Processing.

[11]  Surendra P. Shah,et al.  Acoustic Emission Source Locations in Concrete , 1991 .

[12]  Karen Margaret Holford,et al.  Automatic Classification of Acoustic Emission Patterns , 2003 .

[13]  Chang Liu,et al.  Fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings based on complexity measure and ν support vector machine , 2013 .

[14]  Nn Hsu,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION AND CALIBRATION OF ACOUSTIC EMISSION SENSORS , 1981 .

[15]  M. Pharaoh,et al.  Identification of failure modes in glass/polypropylene composites by means of the primary frequency content of the acoustic emission event , 2004 .

[16]  M I Friswell,et al.  A practical technique for quantifying the performance of acoustic emission systems on plate-like structures. , 2009, Ultrasonics.

[17]  H. Akaike Markovian representation of stochastic processes and its application to the analysis of autoregressive moving average processes , 1974 .

[18]  Andrew W. Moore,et al.  A Bayesian Spatial Scan Statistic , 2005, NIPS.

[19]  T. Lokajíček,et al.  A first arrival identification system of acoustic emission (AE) signals by means of a high-order statistics approach , 2006 .

[20]  M. Hamstad,et al.  A WAVELET TRANSFORM APPLIED TO ACOUSTIC EMISSION SIGNALS: PART 1: SOURCE IDENTIFICATION # , 2002 .

[21]  James Hensman,et al.  Detecting and identifying artificial acoustic emission signals in an industrial fatigue environment , 2008 .

[22]  Hamid Bahai,et al.  Analytical and experimental validations of a numerical band-limited Green's function approach for modelling acoustic emission waves , 2007, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[23]  Karen Margaret Holford,et al.  Acoustic Emission Source Characterisation in Large-Scale Composite Structures , 2011 .

[24]  Karen Margaret Holford,et al.  Acoustic emission source location in composite materials using Delta T Mapping , 2012 .

[25]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[26]  Josef Sikula,et al.  New automatic localization technique of acoustic emission signals in thin metal plates. , 2009, Ultrasonics.

[27]  MARKUS G. R. SAUSE,et al.  SIMULATION OF LAMB WAVE EXCITATION FOR DIFFERENT ELASTIC PROPERTIES AND ACOUSTIC EMISSION SOURCE GEOMETRIES , 2011 .

[28]  Karen Margaret Holford,et al.  Modal Analysis of Acoustic Emission Signals from Artificial and Fatigue Crack Sources in Aerospace Grade Steel , 2005 .

[29]  Karen Margaret Holford,et al.  Delta T source location for acoustic emission , 2007 .

[30]  Bc Lee,et al.  Lamb wave propagation modelling for damage detection: I. Two-dimensional analysis , 2007 .

[31]  Bc Lee,et al.  Modelling of Lamb waves for damage detection in metallic structures: Part I. Wave propagation , 2003 .

[32]  Francesco Ciampa,et al.  A new algorithm for acoustic emission localization and flexural group velocity determination in anisotropic structures , 2010 .

[33]  Alexei Vinogradov,et al.  A real-time approach to acoustic emission clustering , 2013 .

[34]  T. Kundu,et al.  Locating point of impact in anisotropic fiber reinforced composite plates. , 2008, Ultrasonics.

[35]  James Hensman,et al.  Locating acoustic emission sources in complex structures using Gaussian processes , 2008 .

[36]  James John Hensman Novel techniques for acoustic emission monitoring of fatigue fractures in landing gear. , 2010 .

[37]  James Hensman,et al.  Spatial scanning for anomaly detection in acoustic emission testing of an aerospace structure , 2011 .

[38]  Gregory F. Cooper,et al.  A Multivariate Bayesian Scan Statistic , 2007 .

[39]  John M. Gary,et al.  Examination of the Application of a Wavelet Transformation to Acoustic Emission Signals: part 1. Source Identification | NIST , 2002 .

[40]  Nathalie Godin,et al.  Clustering of acoustic emission signals collected during tensile tests on unidirectional glass/polyester composite using supervised and unsupervised classifiers , 2004 .

[41]  Karen Margaret Holford,et al.  A Parameter Correction Technique (PCT) for acoustic emission characterisation in large-scale composites , 2014 .

[42]  A. Z. S. Chong,et al.  ACOUSTIC EMISSION SOURCE LOCATION IN PLATE-LIKE STRUCTURES USING A CLOSELY ARRANGED TRIANGULAR SENSOR ARRAY , 2010 .

[43]  T. Kundu,et al.  Point of impact prediction in isotropic and anisotropic plates from the acoustic emission data. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  Nathalie Godin,et al.  Integration of the Kohonen's self-organising map and k-means algorithm for the segmentation of the AE data collected during tensile tests on cross-ply composites , 2005 .

[45]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[46]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  Progress Towards a Forward Model of the Complete Acoustic Emission Process , 2006 .

[47]  Yang Guo,et al.  Acoustic emission signals classification based on support vector machine , 2010, 2010 2nd International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology.

[48]  Mario Guagliano,et al.  Development of an artificial neural network processing technique for the analysis of damage evolution in pultruded composites with acoustic emission , 2014 .

[49]  K. Worden,et al.  Visualisation and Dimension Reduction of Acoustic Emission Data for Damage Detection , 1999 .

[50]  Jochen H Kurz,et al.  Strategies for reliable automatic onset time picking of acoustic emissions and of ultrasound signals in concrete. , 2005, Ultrasonics.

[51]  Jiao Jingpin,et al.  Acoustic emission source location methods using mode and frequency analysis , 2008 .

[52]  S. Horn,et al.  Quantification of failure mechanisms in mode-I loading of fiber reinforced plastics utilizing acoustic emission analysis , 2012 .

[53]  Karen Margaret Holford,et al.  Parameter Correction Technique (PCT): A novel method for acoustic emission characterisation in large-scale composites , 2015 .

[54]  Karen Margaret Holford,et al.  Towards improved damage location using acoustic emission , 2012 .

[55]  Karen Margaret Holford,et al.  Localisation and identification of fatigue matrix cracking and delamination in a carbon fibre panel by acoustic emission , 2015 .

[56]  Ian T. Nabney,et al.  Netlab: Algorithms for Pattern Recognition , 2002 .

[57]  Markus G. R. SAUSE,et al.  Influence of Internal Discontinuities on Ultrasonic Signal Propagation in Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastics , 2012 .

[58]  James Hensman,et al.  Wavelet Based Feature Extraction for Acoustic Emission , 2007 .

[59]  Mehdi Ahmadi,et al.  Unsupervised acoustic emission data clustering for the analysis of damage mechanisms in glass/polyester composites , 2012, Materials & Design.

[60]  W. Ostachowicz,et al.  Guided Waves in Structures for SHM: The Time - domain Spectral Element Method , 2012 .

[61]  John Summerscales,et al.  Amplitude distribution acoustic emission signatures of unidirectional fibre composite hybrid materials , 1984 .

[62]  H. Yamada,et al.  Lamb wave source location of impact on anisotropic plate , 2000 .

[63]  Pascal Reynaud,et al.  Unsupervised and supervised classification of AE data collected during fatigue test on CMC at high temperature , 2012 .