The Validity of Race and Hispanic-origin Reporting on Death Certificates in the United States: An Update.

Objectives This report presents the findings of an updated study of the validity of race and Hispanic-origin reporting on death certificates in the United States, and its impact on race- and Hispanic origin-specific death rates. Methods The latest version of the National Longitudinal Mortality Study (NLMS) was used to evaluate the classification of race and Hispanic origin on death certificates for deaths occurring in 1999–2011 to decedents in NLMS. To evaluate change over time, these results were compared with those of a study based on an earlier version of NLMS that evaluated the quality of race and ethnicity classification on death certificates for 1979–1989 and 1990–1998. NLMS consists of a series of annual Current Population Survey files (1973 and 1978–2011) and a sample of the 1980 decennial census linked to death certificates for 1979–2011. Pooled 2009–2011 vital statistics mortality data and 2010 decennial census population data were used to estimate and compare observed and corrected race- and Hispanic origin-specific death rates. Results Race and ethnicity reporting on death certificates continued to be highly accurate for both white and black populations during the 1999–2011 period. Misclassification remained high at 40% for the American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN) population. It improved, from 5% to 3%, for the Hispanic population, and from 7% to 3% for the Asian or Pacific Islander (API) population. Decedent characteristics such as place of residence and nativity affected the quality of reporting on the death certificate. Effects of misclassification on death rates were large for the AIAN population but not significant for the Hispanic or API populations.

[1]  P. Sorlie,et al.  Quality of death rates by race and Hispanic origin: a summary of current research, 1999. , 1999, Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research.

[2]  E. Arias,et al.  United States Census 2000 population with bridged race categories. , 2003, Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research.

[3]  S. Preston,et al.  Effects of Age Misreporting on Mortality Estimates at Older Ages , 1999 .

[4]  Cathryn Dippo,et al.  Current Population Survey-Design and Methodology , 2002 .

[5]  Carolyn A. Liebler,et al.  Joining, Leaving, and Staying in the American Indian/Alaska Native Race Category Between 2000 and 2010 , 2016, Demography.

[6]  P. Sorlie,et al.  Validity of demographic characteristics on the death certificate. , 1992, Epidemiology.

[7]  E. Arias,et al.  Paradox lost: Explaining the hispanic adult mortality advantage , 2004, Demography.

[8]  Gary D. Sandefur,et al.  The Growing American Indian Population, 1960–1990: Beyond Demography , 1996 .

[9]  E. Arias,et al.  Period life tables for the non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native population, 2007-2009. , 2014, American journal of public health.

[10]  R. Cassidy,et al.  Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2000 , 2001 .

[11]  J. Barnes,et al.  The 1989 revision of the U.S. Standard Certificates and Reports. , 1991, Vital and health statistics. Ser. 4, Documents and committee reports.

[12]  H M Rosenberg,et al.  Age standardization of death rates: implementation of the year 2000 standard. , 1998, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[13]  R. R. Ramirez,et al.  Identification of Hispanic Ethnicity in Census 2000: Analysis of Data Quality for the Question on Hispanic Origin , 2004 .

[14]  Betsy Guzman,et al.  The Hispanic Population. Census 2000 Brief. , 2001 .

[15]  H. Tz.  Comparability of marital status, race, nativity, and country of origin on the death certificate and matching census record. , 1969 .