Memory and Mystery: The Cultural Selection of Minimally Counterintuitive Narratives

We hypothesize that cultural narratives such as myths and folktales are more likely to achieve cultural stability if they correspond to a minimally counterintuitive (MCI) cognitive template that includes mostly intuitive concepts combined with a minority of counterintuitive ones. Two studies tested this hypothesis, examining whether this template produces a memory advantage, and whether this memory advantage explains the cultural success of folktales. In a controlled laboratory setting, Study 1 found that an MCI template produces a memory advantage after a 1-week delay, relative to entirely intuitive or maximally counterintuitive cognitive templates. Using archival methods, Study 2 examined the cognitive structure of Grimm Brothers folktales. Compared to culturally unsuccessful folktales, those that were demonstrably successful were especially likely to fit an MCI template. These findings highlight the role of human memory processes in cultural evolution.

[1]  Ara Norenzayan,et al.  Belief in Supernatural Agents in the Face of Death , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[2]  Scott Atran,et al.  Religion's evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  D. Sperber Are folk taxonomies “memes”? , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  Steve Vinoski,et al.  Toward Integration The More Things Change , 2001 .

[5]  Frank C. Keil,et al.  The More Things Change ...: Metamorphoses and Conceptual Structure , 1985, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From Text , 1996 .

[7]  Justin L. Barrett,et al.  Why Would Anyone Believe in God , 2004 .

[8]  H. Wellman The Child's Theory of Mind , 1990 .

[9]  C. Heath,et al.  Emotional Selection in Memes : The Case of Urban Legends Chip Heath , 2004 .

[10]  A. Leslie The Perception of Causality in Infants , 1982, Perception.

[11]  A. Lillard,et al.  Ethnopsychologies: cultural variations in theories of mind. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Distinctiveness effects in recall: differential processing or privileged retrieval? , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Paul L. Harris,et al.  Japanese Children's Understanding of the Distinction Between Real and Apparent Emotion , 1988 .

[14]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  P. Thorndyke Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Pascal Boyer,et al.  Mapping the mind: Cognitive constraints on cultural representations: Natural ontologies and religious ideas , 1994 .

[17]  F. Keil,et al.  Conceptualizing a Nonnatural Entity: Anthropomorphism in God Concepts , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  C. Stangor,et al.  Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures. , 1992 .

[19]  B. Berlin,et al.  Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. , 1994 .

[20]  Allyssa McCabe,et al.  What makes a narrative memorable? , 1990, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[21]  Jacob Grimm,et al.  Grimms' Tales for Young and Old: The Complete Stories , 2022 .

[22]  John H. Flavell,et al.  A comparison between the development of the appearance-reality distinction in the People's Republic of China and the United States , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[24]  S. Gelman,et al.  Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity In Cognition And Culture , 1994 .

[25]  Christopher Brumfit,et al.  Literacy, Language and Learning , 1986 .

[26]  Pascal Boyer,et al.  Cognitive templates for religious concepts: cross-cultural evidence for recall of counter-intuitive representations , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  P. Rochat,et al.  Synchrony in the Onset of Mental-State Reasoning , 2005, Psychological science.

[28]  D. Davidson,et al.  Recognition and Recall of Irrelevant and Interruptive Atypical Actions in Script-Based Stories , 1994 .

[29]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[30]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Terror Management Theory of Self-Esteem and Cultural Worldviews: Empirical Assessments and Conceptual Refinements , 1997 .

[31]  W. Kintsch Text comprehension, memory, and learning. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[32]  J. Barrett Exploring the natural foundations of religion , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The psychological foundations of culture. , 1992 .

[34]  W. Kintsch,et al.  The role of culture‐specific schemata in the comprehension and recall of stories∗ , 1978 .

[35]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[36]  Pascal Boyer,et al.  Explaining Religious Ideas: Elements of a Cognitive Approach , 1992 .

[37]  A. Koriat,et al.  Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[38]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Reflections of the Environment in Memory Form of the Memory Functions , 2022 .

[39]  John B. Black,et al.  Scripts in memory for text , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  Ustin,et al.  Spreading Non-natural Concepts : The Role of Intuitive Conceptual Structures in Memory and Transmission of Cultural Materials ¤ , 2004 .

[41]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd ed. , 1995 .

[42]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Is memory schematic , 1983 .

[43]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Principles of Object Perception , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[44]  Ilkka Pyysiäinen,et al.  Current approaches in the cognitive science of religion , 2002 .

[45]  G. Richards The more things change... , 1986, The American journal of nursing.

[46]  Chip Heath,et al.  Idea Habitats: How the Prevalence of Environmental Cues Influences the Success of Ideas , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[47]  H. Wellman,et al.  Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. , 2001, Child development.

[48]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Distinctiveness effects in recall: , 1998 .

[49]  F. Keil Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development , 1989 .

[50]  A. Norenzayan,et al.  Cognitive and Emotional Processes in the Cultural Transmission of Natural and Nonnatural Beliefs , 2003 .

[51]  S. Atran In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion , 2002 .

[52]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence , 1996 .

[53]  D. Sperber,et al.  Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach , 1998 .

[54]  Jack Goody Memory: Memory in Oral Tradition , 1998 .

[55]  E. Spelke,et al.  Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change , 1994 .

[56]  P. Harris,et al.  Belief‐Desire Reasoning among Baka Children: Evidence for a Universal Conception of Mind , 1991 .

[57]  B. Bower A Child's Theory of Mind , 1993 .

[58]  Dan Sperber,et al.  Learning without teaching: Its place in culture. , 1991 .

[59]  P. Boyer Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought , 2001 .

[60]  F. Keil Mapping the mind: The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains: The origins of concepts of living things , 1994 .

[61]  J. Barrett,et al.  Spreading Non-natural Concepts: The Role of Intuitive Conceptual Structures in Memory and Transmission of Cultural Materials ¤ , 2001 .

[62]  William F. Brewer,et al.  The story schema : universal and culture-specific properties , 1984 .

[63]  Pascal Boyer,et al.  Religious thought and behaviour as by-products of brain function , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[64]  Lawrence A. Hirschfeld,et al.  How biological is essentialism , 1999 .

[65]  D. E. Breedlove,et al.  General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology , 1973 .