Identifying cycling-inducing neighborhoods: A latent class approach

ABSTRACT Understanding how spatial attributes of cities and neighborhoods induce cycling is relevant for urban planning and policy making. In this work, ordered logit and latent class models are specified and estimated to analyze how the built environment affects bicycle-commuting frequency. Data come from a survey to 1,487 people in the city of Santiago, Chile, including sociodemographic information, travel behavior patterns and place of residence and work. Using geographic information systems tools, the built environment was characterized with variables calculated for a 500-m-radius buffer around the residential and work locations of each individual. Two models are estimated, first an ordered logit model confirms that built environment variables effect on cycling is similar to what has been reported in the literature, with some new findings such as an increase in cycling when public transport accessibility is low and the role of built environment attributes at the destination. Second, a latent class ordered logit is used to identify two classes of neighborhood in term of their cycling patterns, as a function of their density, presence of cycling infrastructure and distance to the main activity center of the city. This result allows to map the class membership probabilities, potentially helping to identify neighborhoods that encourage cycling and providing relevant information for policy making and infrastructure decisions.

[1]  Jeremy Shires,et al.  Accommodating Underlying Pro-environmental Attitudes in a Rail Travel Context: Application of a Latent Variable Latent Class Specification , 2013 .

[2]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Factors Correlated with Bicycle Commuting: A Study in Six Small U.S. Cities , 2011 .

[3]  J. Pucher,et al.  Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[4]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .

[5]  Kees Maat,et al.  Day-to-Day Choice to Commute or Not by Bicycle , 2011 .

[6]  C. Bhat,et al.  Assessing Impact of Urban Form Measures on Nonwork Trip Mode Choice After Controlling for Demographic and Level-of-Service Effects , 2003 .

[7]  S. Titze,et al.  Association of built-environment, social-environment and personal factors with bicycling as a mode of transportation among Austrian city dwellers. , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[8]  Susan L Handy,et al.  How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[9]  Daniel A. Badoe,et al.  Transportation–land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling , 2000 .

[10]  Helena Beatriz Bettella Cybis,et al.  The influence of built environment and travel attitudes on walking: A case study of Porto Alegre, Brazil , 2016 .

[11]  A. Cheadle,et al.  Cycling and the Built Environment, a US Perspective , 2005 .

[12]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .

[13]  Susan L Handy,et al.  The Influences of the Built Environment and Residential Self-Selection on Pedestrian Behavior: Evidence from Austin, TX , 2005 .

[14]  R. Cervero,et al.  Influences of Built Environments on Walking and Cycling: Lessons from Bogotá , 2009 .

[15]  P. Plaut Non-motorized commuting in the US , 2005 .

[16]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  Integrating psychometric indicators in latent class choice models , 2014 .

[17]  L. Frank,et al.  Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-Occupant Vehicle, Transit, and Walking , 1994 .

[18]  R. McKelvey,et al.  A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables , 1975 .

[19]  R. Cervero,et al.  COMMUTING IN TRANSIT VERSUS AUTOMOBILE NEIGHBORHOODS , 1995 .

[20]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Bikeway Networks: A Review of Effects on Cycling , 2016 .

[21]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Generalized random utility model , 2002, Math. Soc. Sci..

[22]  John Zacharias,et al.  Potential for revival of the bicycle in Beijing , 2016 .

[23]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods and their Applications to Short Term Travel Decisions , 1999 .

[24]  K. Krizek Residential Relocation and Changes in Urban Travel: Does Neighborhood-Scale Urban Form Matter? , 2003 .

[25]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  Using the built environment to oversample walk, transit, and bicycle travel , 2014 .

[26]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework , 2002 .

[27]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Determinants of bicycle commuting in the Washington, DC region: The role of bicycle parking, cyclist showers, and free car parking at work , 2012 .

[28]  Daniel A. Rodriguez,et al.  The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment , 2004 .

[29]  S. Handy,et al.  Factors associated with bicycle ownership and use: a study of six small U.S. cities , 2010 .

[30]  Ricardo A. Daziano,et al.  A hybrid-choice latent-class model for the analysis of the effects of weather on cycling demand , 2015 .

[31]  Bert van Wee,et al.  Key research themes on urban space, scale, and sustainable urban mobility , 2016 .

[32]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Integration of Choice and Latent Variable Models , 1999 .

[33]  M. Brauer,et al.  Built Environment Influences on Healthy Transportation Choices: Bicycling versus Driving , 2010, Journal of urban health.

[34]  Ma Xiang-lu,et al.  Commuting by Bicycle:An Overview of the Literature , 2011 .

[35]  I. Degiovanni,et al.  A STATISTICAL MODEL FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SINGLE-PHOTON COUNTS , 2001 .

[36]  Lee Chapman,et al.  Transport and climate change: a review , 2007 .

[37]  D. Stead Key research themes on governance and sustainable urban mobility , 2016 .

[38]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  Walking frequency, cars, dogs, and the built environment , 2011 .

[39]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California , 2005 .

[40]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A Comprehensive Analysis of Built Environment Characteristics on Household Residential Choice and Auto Ownership Levels , 2007 .

[41]  C. Zegras The Built Environment and Motor Vehicle Ownership and Use: Evidence from Santiago de Chile , 2010 .

[42]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Latent lifestyle preferences and household location decisions , 2007, J. Geogr. Syst..

[43]  E. Fridell,et al.  The mechanism for NOx storage , 2000 .

[44]  Ricardo Hurtubia,et al.  I want to ride it where I like: measuring design preferences in cycling infrastructure , 2019 .

[45]  Xinyu Cao,et al.  Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: A focus on methodologies , 2008 .

[46]  Li Meng,et al.  Combining Latent Class Models and GIS Models for Integrated Transport and Land Use Planning – A Case Study Application , 2016 .

[47]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Similarities in Attitudes and Norms and the Effect on Bicycle Commuting: Evidence from the Bicycle Cities Davis and Delft , 2012 .

[48]  Timothy F Welch,et al.  Land use effects on bicycle ridership: a framework for state planning agencies , 2014 .

[49]  John Pucher,et al.  Why Canadians cycle more than Americans: A comparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies , 2006 .

[50]  Lawrence D Frank,et al.  Environmental and demographic correlates of bicycling. , 2013, Preventive medicine.

[51]  R. Reis,et al.  Built Environment and Physical Activity for Transportation in Adults from Curitiba, Brazil , 2014, Journal of Urban Health.

[52]  L. Frank,et al.  Linking land use with household vehicle emissions in the central puget sound: methodological framework and findings , 2000 .

[53]  D. Olaru,et al.  Residential location and transit-oriented development in a new rail corridor , 2011 .

[54]  D. Olaru,et al.  Lifecycle Stages and Residential Location Choice in the Presence of Latent Preference Heterogeneity , 2013 .

[55]  Daniel P. Piatkowski,et al.  Not all prospective bicyclists are created equal: the role of attitudes, socio-demographics, and the built environment in bicycle commuting , 2015 .

[56]  C. Bhat,et al.  A Mixed Multinomial Logit Model Analysis of Weekend Recreational Episode Type Choice , 2004 .

[57]  Church attendance in Great Britain: an ordered logit approach , 1997 .

[58]  Kees Maat,et al.  The effect of work-related factors on the bicycle commute mode choice in the Netherlands , 2013 .

[59]  Sergio Jara-Díaz,et al.  Modelling bicycle use intention: the role of perceptions , 2016 .

[60]  W. Greene,et al.  计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis , 2009 .

[61]  J. M. Oakes,et al.  Does Residential Density Increase Walking and Other Physical Activity? , 2007 .

[62]  Michael Duncan,et al.  Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[63]  R. Cervero Land-Use Mixing and Suburban Mobility , 1988 .

[64]  Anna Goodman,et al.  Does More Cycling Mean More Diversity in Cycling? , 2016 .

[65]  Xinyu Cao,et al.  Examining the Impacts of Residential Self‐Selection on Travel Behaviour: A Focus on Empirical Findings , 2009 .

[66]  David A. Hensher,et al.  A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit , 2003 .

[67]  A. Kulkarni,et al.  Assessment of Influence of Land Use–Transportation System on Travel Behavior , 1997 .

[68]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis , 2001 .

[69]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Travel Behavior as Function of Accessibility, Land Use Mixing, and Land Use Balance: Evidence from San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[70]  Kenneth A. Small,et al.  Research Policy and Review 25. Modeling Land Use and Transportation: An Interpretive Review for Growth Areas , 1987, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space.

[71]  J. Pucher,et al.  Walking and Cycling for Healthy Cities , 2010 .

[72]  Gary J. Russell,et al.  A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure , 1989 .

[73]  R. Cervero MIXED LAND-USES AND COMMUTING: EVIDENCE FROM THE AMERICAN HOUSING SURVEY , 1996 .

[74]  R. Kitamura,et al.  A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .