A new technique for the calculation of the energy stored, dissipated, and recovered in different ankle-foot prostheses

Previous research reported calculation of mechanical power of ankle-foot devices using the dot product of the ankle moment times the ankle angular velocity. Unfortunately, there are two errors in this analysis technique. The biomechanical model used assumed a rigid foot articulating around the ankle and there was no accounting for energy storage or dissipation and recovery in the viscoelastic material of the cosmetic cover. The first purpose of this paper is to propose a rigorous technique for the calculation of the net energy efficiency that could be used for any articulated or nonarticulated ankle-foot prosthesis. The second purpose is to quantify the amount of energy stored or dissipated and then recovered in order to discriminate between different ankle-foot prostheses. The SACH, Seattle, Flex-foot, and Golden-Ankle ankle-foot prostheses; were evaluated on the same amputee, while walking at his natural cadence. The power entering and leaving the distal end of the prosthetic leg was calculated as the sum of the translational (force-velocity product) and rotational (moment-angular velocity product). All ankle-foot prostheses showed the same distal power pattern. After initial contact, a large energy storage was observed in the cushioned heel, which was followed by some energy recovery. Then, during mid and late stance, another period of storage or dissipation and recovery was observed. Even the SACH foot should be considered an energy storing foot prosthesis since it's cosmetic material was seen to be capable of recovering energy. The balance between the rate of change of foot mechanical energy and the foot powers showed that the new technique takes into account the energy stored or dissipated and then recovered within the compliant material and flexing keel. The new analysis technique can be used by prosthetic designers to assess any type of ankle-foot prostheses. Criteria for ankle-foot prosthesis selection should include, not only the net mechanical efficiency for both rearfoot and forefoot sections, but also, the total energy recovered by the ankle-foot prostheses. >

[2]  Center of mass location and segment angular orientation of below-knee-amputee and able-bodied children during walking. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  Y Setoguchi,et al.  Dynamics of below-knee child amputee gait: SACH foot versus Flex foot. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Shock absorption of below-knee prostheses: a comparison between the SACH and the Multiflex foot. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  S. Fisher,et al.  Energy cost of ambulation in health and disability: a literature review. , 1978, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  J Perry,et al.  Below-knee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: a pilot study. , 1990, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  J H Zettl,et al.  Development and preliminary evaluation of the VA Seattle foot. , 1985, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[8]  Amputees and their prostheses. , 1970 .

[9]  D A Winter,et al.  Performance assessment of the Terry Fox jogging prosthesis for above-knee amputees. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  S. Naumann,et al.  ANALYSIS OF MECHANICAL AND METABOLIC FACTORS IN THE GAIT OF CONGENITAL BELOW KNEE AMPUTEES: A Comparison of the SACH and Seattle Feet , 1992, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[11]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF PROSTHETIC FEET ON BELOW-KNEE AMPUTEE WALKING , 1991, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[12]  James Harder,et al.  Timing Changes for Stance, Swing, and Double Support in a Recent Below-Knee-Amputee Child , 1990 .

[13]  H J Hislop,et al.  Energetics: application to the study and management of locomotor disabilities. Energy cost of normal and pathologic gait. , 1978, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[14]  D. Shurr,et al.  Comparison of Energy Cost and Gait Efficiency During Ambulation in Below-Knee Amputees Using Different Prosthetic Feet—A Preliminary Report , 1988 .

[15]  D. Winter,et al.  Control of whole body balance in the frontal plane during human walking. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  B J McFadyen,et al.  Running gait impulse asymmetries in below-knee amputees , 1992, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[17]  D. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Y. Ehara,et al.  Energy storing property of so-called energy-storing prosthetic feet. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  D. Winter Energy generation and absorption at the ankle and knee during fast, natural, and slow cadences. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  K. Siegel,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of the energy-storing capabilities of SACH and Carbon Copy II prosthetic feet during the stance phase of gait in a person with below-knee amputation. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[21]  B. Bresler The Forces and Moments in the Leg During Level Walking , 1950, Journal of Fluids Engineering.

[22]  A Gitter,et al.  INSIGHTS INTO AMPUTEE RUNNING: A Muscle Work Analysis , 1992, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[23]  J R Engsberg,et al.  External loading comparisons between able-bodied and below-knee-amputee children during walking. , 1991, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  M. Pierrynowski,et al.  The role of the contralateral limb in below-knee amputee gait , 1990, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[25]  D. Winter,et al.  Mechanical energy generation, absorption and transfer amongst segments during walking. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  Joint moment and muscle power output characteristics of below knee amputees during running: the influence of energy storing prosthetic feet. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  D. Barth,et al.  Gait Analysis and Energy Cost of Below‐Knee Amputees Wearing Six Different Prosthetic Feet , 1992 .

[28]  Ground reaction forces and center of pressure patterns in the gait of children with amputation: preliminary report. , 1985, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[29]  A Biomechanical Analysis of Amputee Athlete Gait , 1990 .

[30]  Donald G. Shurr,et al.  Gait Comparisons for Below-Knee Amputees Using a Flex-Foot™ Versus a Conventional Prosthetic Foot , 1991 .