This paper presents a comparative analysis of the sources of error in forecasts for the UK economy published over a recent four-year period by four independent groups. This analysis rests on the archiving at the ESRC Macroeconomic Modelling Bureau of the original forecasts together with all their accompanying assumptions and adjustments. A method of decomposing observed forecast errors so as to distinguish the contributions of forecaster and model is set out; the impact of future expectations treated in a ‘model-consistent’ or ‘rational’ manner is specifically considered. The results show that the forecaster's adjustments make a substantial contribution to forecast performance, a good part of which comes from adjustments that bring the model on track at the start of the forecast period. The published ex-ante forecasts are usually superior to pure model-based ex-post forecasts, whose performance indicates some misspecification of the underlying models.
[1]
Kenneth Frank Wallis,et al.
Models of the Uk Economy: A Review by the Esrc Macroeconomic Modelling Bureau
,
1985
.
[2]
Stephen K. McNees.
The role of macroeconometric models in forecasting and policy analysis in the united states
,
1982
.
[3]
Kenneth F. Wallis,et al.
Macroeconomic Forecasting: A Survey
,
1989
.
[4]
G. Treyz,et al.
Forecasts with quarterly macroeconometric models
,
1974
.
[5]
Adrian Pagan,et al.
On the role of simulation in the statistical evaluation of econometric models
,
1989
.
[6]
D. Turner.
The role of judgement in macroeconomic forecasting
,
1990
.
[7]
K. Wallis,et al.
The Historical Tracking Performance of UK Macroeconometric Models
,
1990
.