RSQSim Earthquake Simulator

As discussed in Tullis et al. (2012b), a promising avenue for improving seismic hazard estimation and reducing the large uncertainties in current assessments is to incorporate more accurate and region‐specific characterizations of the interactions and physical processes that control earthquake occurrence in fault systems. Earthquake simulators are computer models that can contribute to this by carrying out large‐scale simulations of earthquake occurrence to characterize system‐level response of fault systems including processes that control time, place, and extent of earthquake slip. Such simulators were pioneered by work such as Rundle (1988), Robinson and Benites (1995), and Ward (1996). Four such simulators are discussed in the November/December 2012 Seismological Research Letters issue, and their general features are described in Tullis et al. (2012a). This paper describes features specific to one of those four, RSQSim. It also presents results that are relevant to particularly unique features of RSQSim: comparisons with fully dynamic single‐event simulations and the spatial‐temporal clustering of seismicity due to RSQSim’s use of rate‐ and state‐dependent friction (RSF). RSQSim is based on a scheme initially developed by Dieterich (1995) with several enhancements to extend its use in a number of directions including allowing fully general fault system geometries and the attendant normal stress variations, better validation of the quasi‐dynamic part of the seismic cycle against fully dynamic models, and the inclusion of creeping parts of the fault system. Ziv (2003) and Ziv and Rubin (2003) used some elements of the original method to study clustering processes and frequency statistics. RSQSim itself has been used by Dieterich and Richards‐Dinger (2010) to study the effects of both small‐ and large‐scale fault system geometry on recurrence statistics in a idealized but complex fault system. We do not discuss it further here, but RSQSim has also been used successfully to model slow …

[1]  J. Dieterich.  Modeling of rock friction: 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations , 1979 .

[2]  Louise H. Kellogg,et al.  Generic Earthquake Simulator , 2012 .

[3]  A. Ziv.  Foreshocks, aftershocks, and remote triggering in quasi‐static fault models , 2003 .

[4]  J. Rice.  Spatio‐temporal complexity of slip on a fault , 1993 .

[5]  J. Dieterich.  Applications of Rate- and State-Dependent Friction to Models of Fault-Slip and Earthquake Occurrence , 2007 .

[6]  M. F. Linker,et al.  Effects of variable normal stress on rock friction: Observations and constitutive equations , 1992 .

[7]  David J. Wald,et al.  Dynamic stress changes during earthquake rupture , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[8]  J. C. Savage.  A dislocation model of strain accumulation and release at a subduction zone , 1983 .

[9]  C. Marone.  LABORATORY-DERIVED FRICTION LAWS AND THEIR APPLICATION TO SEISMIC FAULTING , 1998 .

[10]  A. Ziv,et al.  Implications of rate‐and‐state friction for properties of aftershock sequence: Quasi‐static inherently discrete simulations , 2003 .

[11]  James H. Dieterich,et al.  Earthquake simulations with time-dependent nucleation and long-range interactions , 1995 .

[12]  R. Robinson.  Potential earthquake triggering in a complex fault network: the northern South Island, New Zealand , 2004 .

[13]  David D. Oglesby,et al.  Earthquake dynamics on dip-slip faults , 1999 .

[14]  Louise H. Kellogg,et al.  A Comparison among Observations and Earthquake Simulator Results for the allcal2 California Fault Model , 2012 .

[15]  R. Madariaga.  Dynamics of an expanding circular fault , 1976, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[16]  Russell Robinson,et al.  Synthetic seismicity models of multiple interacting faults , 1995 .

[17]  Whirley.  DYNA3D: A nonlinear, explicit, three-dimensional finite element code for solid and structural mechanics , 1993 .

[18]  J. Rundle.  A physical model for earthquakes: 2. Application to southern California , 1988 .

[19]  B. E. Shaw,et al.  Postseismic response of repeating aftershocks , 1998 .

[20]  Y. Okada.  Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[21]  J. Dieterich,et al.  Aftershock Sequences Modeled with 3-D Stress Heterogeneity and Rate-State Seismicity Equations: Implications for Crustal Stress Estimation , 2010 .

[22]  Christian Goltz,et al.  Are seismic waiting time distributions universal , 2004 .

[23]  J. Dieterich.  Earthquake nucleation on faults with rate-and state-dependent strength , 1992 .

[24]  J. Dieterich.  A constitutive law for rate of earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering , 1994 .

[25]  Y. Ogata,et al.  The Centenary of the Omori Formula for a Decay Law of Aftershock Activity , 1995 .

[26]  James H. Dieterich,et al.  Earthquake Recurrence in Simulated Fault Systems , 2010 .

[27]  T. Tullis.  Rock friction constitutive behavior from laboratory experiments and its implications for an earthquake prediction field monitoring program , 1988 .

[28]  James H. Dieterich,et al.  Multi‐event simulations of slow slip events for a Cascadia‐like subduction zone , 2011 .

[29]  Gregory C. Beroza,et al.  Short slip duration in dynamic rupture in the presence of heterogeneous fault properties , 1996 .

[30]  E. Dunham,et al.  A Supershear Transition Mechanism for Cracks , 2003, Science.

[31]  Steven N. Ward,et al.  A synthetic seismicity model for southern California: Cycles, probabilities, and hazard , 1996 .

[32]  J. Brune.  Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes , 1970 .

[33]  A. Ruina.  Slip instability and state variable friction laws , 1983 .

[34]  Earthquake nucleation on faults with nonconstant normal stress , 2011 .