Lempel-Ziv and multiscale Lempel-Ziv complexity in depression

There is a high demand for objective indicators in diagnosis of depression as diagnosis of depression is still based on psychiatrist's subjective judgment. A nonlinear method Lempel Ziv Complexity (LZC) has been previously successfully used for detection of neuronal or mental disorders based on electroencephalographic (EEG) signals. However, the method overlooks the high frequency content of EEG signals. Therefore, this study is aimed to find out whether the use of Multiscale Lempel Ziv Complexity (MLZC), considering also high frequencies, could overcome the limitations of LZC and better differentiate depression. In current study the EEG recordings were carried out on the groups of depressive and healthy subjects of 11 volunteers each. The LZC and MLZC were calculated on resting EEG signals in eyes open condition from 30 channels at a length of 2 minutes. The results revealed the incapability of traditional LZC to differentiate depressive subjects from healthy controls in eyes open condition, while MLZC differentiated two groups in numerous channels at different frequencies, giving the highest classification accuracy in channel F3 (86 %) at frequencies 9 and 15.5 Hz. The results indicate that the high frequency information, which is lost in calculation of traditional LZC, has a great value in differentiating between depressive and control groups.

[1]  S. Tong,et al.  Abnormal EEG complexity in patients with schizophrenia and depression , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  Reza Boostani,et al.  Entropy and complexity measures for EEG signal classification of schizophrenic and control participants , 2009, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[3]  Robin Baker Fragile Science: The Reality Behind the Headlines , 2001 .

[4]  Hiie Hinrikus,et al.  Lempel Ziv Complexity of EEG in Depression , 2015 .

[5]  Miro Jakovljević,et al.  Quantitative electroencephalography in schizophrenia and depression. , 2011, Psychiatria Danubina.

[6]  Erik W. Jensen,et al.  EEG complexity as a measure of depth of anesthesia for patients , 2001, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng..

[7]  V. Knott,et al.  EEG power, frequency, asymmetry and coherence in male depression , 2001, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[8]  Abraham Lempel,et al.  On the Complexity of Finite Sequences , 1976, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  R. Hornero,et al.  Entropy and Complexity Analyses in Alzheimer’s Disease: An MEG Study , 2010, The open biomedical engineering journal.

[10]  Roberto Hornero,et al.  Complexity analysis of spontaneous brain activity: effects of depression and antidepressant treatment , 2012, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[11]  Roberto Hornero,et al.  Analysis of EEG background activity in Alzheimer's disease patients with Lempel-Ziv complexity and central tendency measure. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  José María Amigó,et al.  Estimating the Entropy Rate of Spike Trains via Lempel-Ziv Complexity , 2004, Neural Computation.

[13]  Roberto Hornero,et al.  Lempel–Ziv complexity in schizophrenia: A MEG study , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  Roberto Hornero,et al.  Complexity analysis of the magnetoencephalogram background activity in Alzheimer's disease patients. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[15]  Radhakrishnan Nagarajan,et al.  Quantifying physiological data with Lempel-Ziv complexity-certain issues , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Sergio Iglesias-Parro,et al.  Multiscale Lempel–Ziv complexity for EEG measures , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  A. Beck,et al.  Depression: Causes and Treatment , 1967 .

[18]  Roberto Hornero,et al.  Interpretation of the Lempel-Ziv Complexity Measure in the Context of Biomedical Signal Analysis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Juri D Kropotov,et al.  EEG Power Spectra at Early Stages of Depressive Disorders , 2009, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.