Precarious curve ahead: The effects of forced distribution rating systems on job performance

[1]  H. Triandis.  Individualism and Collectivism , 2018 .

[2]  Timothy T. Baldwin,et al.  Who is attracted to an organisation using a forced distribution performance management system , 2013 .

[3]  Daniel Heller,et al.  Interpersonal Injustice and Workplace Deviance , 2012 .

[4]  James H. Dulebohn,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Consequences of Leader-Member Exchange , 2012 .

[5]  Jennifer Brown,et al.  Quitters Never Win: The (Adverse) Incentive Effects of Competing with Superstars , 2011, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  Rebecca A. Bull Schaefer,et al.  A New Hope for Rank and Yank , 2011 .

[7]  John E. Delery,et al.  CONTINGENCIES IN THE EFFECTS OF PAY RANGE ON ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS , 2009 .

[8]  Deidra J. Schleicher,et al.  Rater Reactions to Forced Distribution Rating Systems , 2009 .

[9]  P. Cappelli.  What's old is new again: Managerial “talent” in an historical context , 2009 .

[10]  Timothy T. Baldwin,et al.  Reactions to Different Types of Forced Distribution Performance Evaluation Systems , 2009 .

[11]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  The performance evaluation context: Social, emotional, cognitive, political, and relationship components , 2008 .

[12]  D. Bergeron,et al.  The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost? , 2007 .

[13]  Angela M. Sternburgh,et al.  Absolute vs Relative Performance Rating Formats: Implications for Fairness and Organizational Justice , 2007 .

[14]  E. Dierdorff,et al.  Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths & Total Nonsense: Profiting From Evidence-Based Management. , 2007 .

[15]  Avishalom Tor,et al.  Rankings, Standards, and Competition: Task vs. Scale Comparisons , 2007 .

[16]  C. Trevor,et al.  A contingent view of reactions to objective pay conditions: interdependence among pay structure characteristics and pay relative to internal and external referents. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  Avishalom Tor,et al.  Ranks and Rivals: A Theory of Competition , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[19]  M. Villeval,et al.  Effort and Comparison Income: Experimental and Survey Evidence , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths, and Total Nonsense: Profiting from Evidence-based Management , 2006 .

[21]  K. Lawrence.  The World According to Trump , 2005 .

[22]  Christopher O. L. H. Porter,et al.  Goal orientation: effects on backing up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  Pay Disparities Within Top Management Groups: Evidence of Harmful Effects on Performance of High-Technology Firms , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[24]  Paul K. Bergey,et al.  FORCED DISTRIBUTION RATING SYSTEMS AND THE IMPROVEMENT OF WORKFORCE POTENTIAL: A BASELINE SIMULATION , 2005 .

[25]  M. Sturman,et al.  The impact of job complexity and performance measurement on the temporal consistency, stability, and test-retest reliability of employee job performance ratings. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  J. Colquitt,et al.  Does the justice of the one interact with the justice of the many? Reactions to procedural justice in teams. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  Michael C. Sturman,et al.  Searching for the Inverted U-Shaped Relationship Between Time and Performance: Meta-Analyses of the Experience/Performance, Tenure/Performance, and Age/Performance Relationships , 2003 .

[28]  S. Rynes,et al.  Attracting Applicants in the War for Talent: Differences in Work Preferences Among High Achievers , 2002 .

[29]  John W. Boudreau,et al.  Separating the Developmental and Evaluative Performance Appraisal Uses , 2002 .

[30]  M. Rotundo.  The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: a policy-capturing approach. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[32]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  S. Carroll,et al.  Individualism/Collectivism Orientations and Reactions Toward Alternative Human Resource Management Practices , 1998 .

[34]  I. M. Jawahar,et al.  WHERE ALL THE CHILDREN ARE ABOVE AVERAGE: THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PURPOSE EFFECT , 1997 .

[35]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  LEADERSHIP TRAINING IN ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE TO INCREASE CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR WITHIN A LABOR UNION: A REPLICATION , 1997 .

[36]  R. Folger,et al.  RETALIATION IN THE WORKPLACE: THE ROLES OF DISTRIBUTIVE, PROCEDURAL, AND INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE , 1997 .

[37]  Walter C. Borman,et al.  Task Performance and Contextual Performance: The Meaning for Personnel Selection Research , 1997 .

[38]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings , 1996 .

[39]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  Increasing citizenship behavior within a labor union : A test of organizational justice theory , 1996 .

[40]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[41]  R. Bennett,et al.  A TYPOLOGY OF DEVIANT WORKPLACE BEHAVIORS: A MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING STUDY , 1995 .

[42]  T. Judge,et al.  PAY PREFERENCES AND JOB SEARCH DECISIONS: A PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT PERSPECTIVE , 1994 .

[43]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Assessing the Relationship between Industry Characteristics and Organizational Culture: How Different can You Be? , 1994 .

[44]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. , 1993 .

[45]  Thomas L. Keon,et al.  Organizational attractiveness: an interactionist perspective , 1993 .

[46]  G. Milkovich,et al.  The Current State of Performance Appraisal Research and Practice: Concerns, Directions, and Implications , 1992 .

[47]  Brian E. Becker,et al.  The Incentive Effects of Tournament Compensation Systems , 1992 .

[48]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Why do employers only reward extreme performance? Examining the relationships among performance, pay, and turnover. , 1992 .

[49]  Cecilia M. Falbe,et al.  Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations , 1991 .

[50]  D. Caldwell,et al.  Measuring person-job fit with a profile-comparison process , 1990 .

[51]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. , 1990 .

[52]  D. Organ.  Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. , 1988 .

[53]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[54]  Chester A. Schriesheim,et al.  Field studies of French and Raven's bases of power: Critique, reanalysis, and suggestions for future research. , 1985 .

[55]  M. Mount,et al.  Psychometric properties of subordinate ratings of managerial performance. , 1984 .

[56]  Robert J. Wherry,et al.  THE CONTROL OF BIAS IN RATINGS: A THEORY OF RATING , 1982 .

[57]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  Increasing productivity through performance appraisal , 1981 .

[58]  M. Kiggundu,et al.  Task Interdependence and the Theory of Job Design , 1981 .

[59]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[60]  E. Lazear,et al.  Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[61]  John E. Dittrich,et al.  Equity Theory: The Recent Literature, Methodological Considerations, and New Directions , 1978 .

[62]  M. Deutsch.  A Theory of Co-operation and Competition , 1949 .

[63]  E. Sisson.  Forced Choice—The New Army Rating1 , 1948 .

[64]  Gary W. Giumetti,et al.  Forced distribution rating systems: when does "rank and yank" lead to adverse impact? , 2015, The Journal of applied psychology.

[65]  Christine Harbring,et al.  Performance Appraisals and the Impact of Forced Distribution: An Experimental Investigation , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[66]  Jonathon R B Halbesleben,et al.  Emotional exhaustion and job performance: the mediating role of motivation. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[67]  Barry Gerhart,et al.  Personnel psychology: performance evaluation and pay for performance. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[68]  Celia Moore,et al.  New Developments in Performance Management , 2005 .

[69]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  Cooperation, competition and team performance: Toward a contingency approach , 2002 .

[70]  Jack Welch,et al.  Jack: Straight From the Gut , 2001 .

[71]  J Noak,et al.  Performance rating. , 1999, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[72]  J. Shaw,et al.  Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. , 1998 .

[73]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. , 1996 .

[74]  W. Borman,et al.  Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance , 1993 .

[75]  ScienceDirect.  Human resource management review , 1991 .

[76]  J. Hackman,et al.  Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey , 1975 .

[77]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[78]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .