Team Members’ Interaction Anxiety and Team-Training Effectiveness

Objective: In the present study, we examined the relationship between team members’ interaction anxiety and team-training effectiveness. Background: Training in the context of teams can be focused on either individual or team outcomes. Relatedly, the individual differences of team members can hinder or facilitate the effectiveness of training for both individuals and the team as a collective. Interaction anxiety is an understudied individual difference that has been shown to be negatively related to training effectiveness in individual contexts. However, its effects in team-training contexts are yet to be investigated. Method: A sample of 492 students in 123 four-person teams was trained to operate a complex, computer-based team task. Results: Interaction anxiety negatively related to team cohesion and team-training effectiveness. A cusp catastrophe model fit the data and showed that teams with more than one high-interaction-anxiety member were negatively affected. Conclusion: Interaction anxiety inhibits the social activities of team training, in turn reducing team-training effectiveness when there is more than one high-interaction-anxiety individual on the training team. Application: These results highlight the importance of examining interaction anxiety as a training team compositional variable that may inhibit behaviors and team processes necessary to capitalize on the positive social activities on which team training depends since the interaction anxiety composition of training teams may serve as an important boundary condition on the effectiveness team-training interventions.

[1]  Stephen J. Merrill Nonlinear Dynamical Systems Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Using Real Data , 2010 .

[2]  Robert Rosen,et al.  Structural stability and morphogenesis , 1977 .

[3]  Stephen J. Guastello Catastrophe models with nonlinear regression , 2011 .

[4]  Suzanne T Bell,et al.  Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  S. Guastello Managing Emergent Phenomena: Nonlinear Dynamics in Work Organizations , 2001 .

[6]  M. Leary Social anxiousness: the construct and its measurement. , 1983, Journal of personality assessment.

[7]  Eric Anthony Day,et al.  Criterion‐Related Validity of Statistical Operationalizations of Group General Cognitive Ability as a Function of Task Type: Comparing the Mean, Maximum, and Minimum1 , 2004 .

[8]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Interactive Team Cognition , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  Arthur S Blaiwes,et al.  Measurement of Team Behaviors in a Navy Environment , 1986 .

[11]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Responses of the socially anxious to the prospect of interpersonal evaluation. , 1990, Journal of personality.

[12]  Brian Young,et al.  BRIEF REPORT: Effectiveness of Individual and Dyadic Training Protocols: The Influence of Trainee Interaction Anxiety , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[13]  M. Leary Social Anxiety as an Early Warning System: A Refinement and Extension of the Self-Presentation Theory of Social Anxiety , 2010 .

[14]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The Impact of Cross-Training on Team Functioning: An Empirical Investigation , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[15]  Stephen J. Guastello,et al.  Chaos and complexity in psychology: The theory of nonlinear dynamical systems. , 2008 .

[16]  David J. Woehr,et al.  The impact of aggressive individuals on team training , 2010 .

[17]  M. Leary CHAPTER 5 – Social Anxiety, Shyness, and Related Constructs , 1991 .

[18]  Bryan D. Edwards,et al.  Ability-Based Pairing Strategies in the Team-Based Training of a Complex Skill: Does the Intelligence of Your Training Partner Matter? , 2005 .

[19]  E. Salas,et al.  The science of training: a decade of progress. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  Stephen J. Guastello,et al.  Cusp Catastrophe Models for Cognitive Workload and Fatigue in a Verbally Cued Pictorial Memory Task , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[21]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Team coordination dynamics. , 2010, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[22]  Winston Bennett,et al.  Team Task Analysis , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[23]  D. Beal,et al.  Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  L. Cobb Parameter estimation for the cusp catastrophe model , 1981 .

[25]  L. Festinger Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.

[26]  Philip C. Abrami,et al.  Effects of Within-Class Grouping on Student Achievement: An Exploratory Model , 2000 .

[27]  Winfred Arthur,et al.  The comparative effect of subjective and objective after-action reviews on team performance on a complex task. , 2013, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Jeffrey A. Jordan,et al.  Dyadic Versus Individual Training Protocols: Loss and Reacquisition of a Complex Skill , 1997 .

[29]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  T Marshall,et al.  Chaos and complexity. , 1999, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[31]  Eric Anthony Day,et al.  Relationships among team ability composition, team mental models, and team performance. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  Stephen J. Guastello,et al.  Catastrophe Models for Cognitive Workload and Fatigue in a Vigilance Dual Task , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[33]  Robin M. Kowalski,et al.  The Interaction Anxiousness Scale: construct and criterion-related validity. , 1993, Journal of personality assessment.

[34]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Backing up behaviors in teams: the role of personality and legitimacy of need. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.