Very high density EEG elucidates spatiotemporal aspects of early visual processing

Standard human EEG systems based on spatial Nyquist estimates suggest that 20–30 mm electrode spacing suffices to capture neural signals on the scalp, but recent studies posit that increasing sensor density can provide higher resolution neural information. Here, we compared “super-Nyquist” density EEG (“SND”) with Nyquist density (“ND”) arrays for assessing the spatiotemporal aspects of early visual processing. EEG was measured from 128 electrodes arranged over occipitotemporal brain regions (14 mm spacing) while participants viewed flickering checkerboard stimuli. Analyses compared SND with ND-equivalent subsets of the same electrodes. Frequency-tagged stimuli were classified more accurately with SND than ND arrays in both the time and the frequency domains. Representational similarity analysis revealed that a computational model of V1 correlated more highly with the SND than the ND array. Overall, SND EEG captured more neural information from visual cortex, arguing for increased development of this approach in basic and translational neuroscience.

[1]  A. Dale,et al.  Functional analysis of primary visual cortex (V1) in humans. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  D. Regan Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light. , 1966, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  Pulkit Grover,et al.  Lower bounds on the minimax risk for the source localization problem , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT).

[4]  Adrian T. Lee,et al.  fMRI of human visual cortex , 1994, Nature.

[5]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Identification of the neural sources of the pattern-reversal VEP , 2005, NeuroImage.

[7]  Susan G. Wardle,et al.  Decoding Dynamic Brain Patterns from Evoked Responses: A Tutorial on Multivariate Pattern Analysis Applied to Time Series Neuroimaging Data , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Error bars in within-subject designs: a comment on Baguley (2012) , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[9]  Pulkit Grover,et al.  An Information-Theoretic View of EEG Sensing , 2017, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[10]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[11]  Claudio Pollo,et al.  Electroencephalographic source imaging: a prospective study of 152 operated epileptic patients , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Models of object recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  Michael J. Tarr,et al.  Task-Specific Codes for Face Recognition: How they Shape the Neural Representation of Features for Detection and Individuation , 2008, PloS one.

[15]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical sources of the steady‐state visual evoked potential , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[16]  Daniël Lakens,et al.  Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[17]  W. Freeman,et al.  Spatial spectra of scalp EEG and EMG from awake humans , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  Ramesh Srinivasan,et al.  Estimating the spatial Nyquist of the human EEG , 1998 .

[19]  Philip G. Grieve,et al.  Quantitative analysis of spatial sampling error in the infant and adult electroencephalogram , 2004, NeuroImage.

[20]  Paul B. Colditz,et al.  Spatial patterning of the neonatal EEG suggests a need for a high number of electrodes , 2013, NeuroImage.

[21]  Kyungmin Su,et al.  The PREP pipeline: standardized preprocessing for large-scale EEG analysis , 2015, Front. Neuroinform..

[22]  Christopher Hughes,et al.  Ultra-dense EEG sampling results in two-fold increase of functional brain information , 2014, NeuroImage.

[23]  R. Bakeman Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[24]  J. Fermaglich Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG , 1982 .

[25]  Thomas Serre,et al.  A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Alexander Borst,et al.  How does Nature Program Neuron Types? , 2008, Front. Neurosci..

[27]  Antigona Martínez,et al.  Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  J. Malmivuo,et al.  Study on the spatial resolution of EEG - effect of electrode density and measurement noise , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[29]  Jaakko Malmivuo,et al.  Effect of skull resistivity and measurement noise on the spatial resolution of EEG , 2005 .

[30]  P. Nunez,et al.  Spatial filtering and neocortical dynamics: estimates of EEG coherence , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.