Abstract.Visually evoked postural responses (VEPR) to a roll-motion rotating disk were recorded from normal subjects standing on a yaw axis motorised rotating platform. The disk was fluorescent so that subjects could be tested in an otherwise dark room. Movements of the head and centre of foot pressure were measured while subjects looked at the disk with their eyes and head in the primary position and while the rotating platform moved the subjects randomly to 0, +/–45° and +/–90° angles from the visual stimulus. Subjects were instructed to maintain fixation on the centre of the rotating disk but the amount of horizontal eye and head movement used was not specified. Platform rotational velocity was set near threshold values for perception of self-rotation (~2°/s) so that subjects would find it difficult to reconstruct the angle travelled. The data showed that the VEPR occurred in the plane of disk rotation, regardless of body position with respect to the disk, and despite the subjective spatial disorientation induced by the experiment. Averages of the response revealed a good match (gain=0.95) between disk orientation and sway direction. The horizontal gaze deviation required to fixate the centre of the disk was largely achieved by head motion (head 95%, eye 5%). The results confirm previous results that VEPRs are reoriented according to horizontal gaze angle. In addition, we show that the postural reorientation is independent of cognitively or visually mediated knowledge of the geometry of the experimental conditions. In the current experiments, the main source of gaze position input required for VEPR reorientation was likely to be provided by neck afferents. The results support the notion that vision controls posture effectively at any gaze angle and that this is achieved by combining visual input with proprioceptively mediated gaze-angle signals.
[1]
J. Roll,et al.
Eye, head and skeletal muscle spindle feedback in the elaboration of body references.
,
1989,
Progress in brain research.
[2]
R. Held,et al.
The role of vision in gravitational orientation.
,
1975,
Fortschritte der Zoologie.
[3]
J. Hulk,et al.
The turning test with small regulable stimuli; the normal cupulogram.
,
1948,
The Journal of laryngology and otology.
[4]
S. Lund,et al.
Effects of different head positions on postural sway in man induced by a reproducible vestibular error signal.
,
1983,
Acta physiologica Scandinavica.
[5]
A M Bronstein,et al.
The perception of head and neck angular displacement in normal and labyrinthine-defective subjects. A quantitative study using a 'remembered saccade' technique.
,
1995,
Brain : a journal of neurology.
[6]
T. Stoffregen.
Flow structure versus retinal location in the optical control of stance.
,
1985,
Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[7]
A. Bronstein,et al.
Reorientation of visually evoked postural responses by different eye-in-orbit and head-on-trunk angular positions
,
1996,
Experimental Brain Research.
[8]
Ma Gresty,et al.
Vestibular and Visual Control on Posture and Locomotor Equilibrium
,
1986
.
[9]
A. Berthoz,et al.
Habituation of Postural Readjustments Induced by Motion of Visual Scenes
,
1985
.
[10]
L. Jongkees.
Pathology of Vestibular Sensation
,
1974
.
[11]
C. Gielen,et al.
Postural responses to simulated moving environments are not invariant for the direction of gaze
,
2004,
Experimental Brain Research.
[12]
L. Stark,et al.
Ocular proprioception and efference copy in registering visual direction
,
1991,
Vision Research.