The Comparison of Using the Preferred or Non-Preferred Wrist When Measuring Physical Activity

Introduction. People who participate in regular physical activity have a decreased risk of chronic diseases and premature death. A dramatic decrease of physical activity occurs from adolescence to young adulthood. With important implications to health, physical activity is an important behavior to measure. However, inconsistencies exist on how to measure physical activity. When using accelerometers, differences between the preferred or non-preferred wrist may result in different estimates of physical activity. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the preferred and non-preferred wrist accelerometry measured physical activity using commonly used research accelerometers during structured daily college activities (Actigraph GT3x-bt and GT9X Link) and free-living conditions of college students (Actigraph GT9X Link). Methods: 30 college students (15 females and 15 males) completed 7 laboratory tasks including shooting a basketball (BB), relaxing on a couch (Relax), hitting a racquetball (RB), walking up and down stairs (WUS), walking on an inclined surface (WUI), walking while using a smart phone (WSP), and using a laptop (COM). An Actigraph GT3x-bt and Actigraph Link on each wrist and the right hip. After the tasks, the students completed one week of free-living conditions wearing an Actigraph Link on each wrist. Accelerometer counts from the preferred and nonpreferred wrists were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for the lab activities and a paired t tests for the free-living conditions with α at .05. Results: Preferred and non-preferred total counts per minute from the Actigraph Link were significantly different for BB (p= <.001), COM (p=.004), RB (p= <.001), Relax (p=.027), WSP (p=.001), and WUS (p=.043). The freeliving conditions showed no significant differences between the preferred and non-preferred wrist. Conclusion. Researchers should be aware when measuring physical activity in structured activities that the preferred and non-preferred wrist can affect the measurement. Though for free living conditions, less concern should be placed on the preferred or preferred wrist.

[1]  Olivier Dieu,et al.  Physical activity using wrist‐worn accelerometers: comparison of dominant and non‐dominant wrist , 2017, Clinical physiology and functional imaging.

[2]  P. Lee,et al.  The convergent validity of Actiwatch 2 and ActiGraph Link accelerometers in measuring total sleeping period, wake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency in free-living condition , 2017, Sleep and Breathing.

[3]  Lucy Parrington,et al.  Validity and inter-device reliability of dominant and non-dominant wrist worn activity trackers in suburban walking , 2016 .

[4]  Andrew Lepp,et al.  Mobile phone use among college students is a sedentary leisure behavior which may interfere with exercise , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  R. Furberg,et al.  Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers , 2015, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[6]  Scott E Crouter,et al.  Estimating physical activity in youth using a wrist accelerometer. , 2015, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  Ulf Ekelund,et al.  Age group comparability of raw accelerometer output from wrist- and hip-worn monitors. , 2014, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  Deana L. Julka,et al.  Accelerometer-Measured Versus Self-reported Physical Activity in College Students: Implications for Research and Practice , 2014, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[9]  L. Kelly,et al.  Validity of actigraphs uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers for assessment of physical activity in adults in laboratory conditions , 2013, BMC medical physics.

[10]  J. Issartel,et al.  Patterns of noncompliance in adolescent field-based accelerometer research. , 2013, Journal of physical activity & health.

[11]  Alexander Woll,et al.  Long-term health benefits of physical activity – a systematic review of longitudinal studies , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[12]  Gaynor Parfitt,et al.  Calibration of the GENEA accelerometer for assessment of physical activity intensity in children. , 2013, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[13]  Tina L Hurst,et al.  Physical activity classification using the GENEA wrist-worn accelerometer. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  J. Staudenmayer,et al.  Validation of wearable monitors for assessing sedentary behavior. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  Greet Cardon,et al.  Calibration and comparison of accelerometer cut points in preschool children. , 2011, International journal of pediatric obesity : IJPO : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[16]  Michael Catt,et al.  Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  L. Andersen,et al.  Health‐related aspects of objectively measured daily physical activity in children , 2008, Clinical physiology and functional imaging.

[18]  Catrine Tudor-Locke,et al.  Actigraph accelerometer interinstrument reliability during free-living in adults. , 2007, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  M. Dinger,et al.  Accelerometer-determined physical activity of free-living college students. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  D. Warburton,et al.  Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[21]  W. Tryon The reliability and validity of two Ambulatory Monitoring actigraphs , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[22]  Patrick B. Johnson,et al.  Research Note: What If We're Wrong? Some Possible Implications of Systematic Distortions in Adolescents' Self-Reports of Sensitive Behaviors , 2004 .

[23]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[24]  J. Curnow,et al.  Technical reliability of the CSA activity monitor: The EarlyBird Study. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  J. Buckworth,et al.  Characteristics of exercise behavior among college students: application of social cognitive theory to predicting stage of change. , 2000, Preventive medicine.

[26]  Janet E. Fulton,et al.  Assessment of Physical Activity among Children and Adolescents: A Review and Synthesis , 2000 .

[27]  M. Annett Handedness and cerebral dominance: the right shift theory. , 1998, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[28]  B. Marcus,et al.  A stages of change approach to understanding college students' physical activity. , 1995, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[29]  C. Caspersen,et al.  Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. , 1985, Public health reports.