Human Agency and the Revitalization of the Public Sphere

This article introduces a theory of human agency that helps identify and integrate factors that may be important for explaining why the advent of the Internet has not revitalized the public sphere. The theory suggests three types of interrelated explanations. One type of explanation focuses on the “economy of attention”—limits to human information processing and resulting tradeoffs. A second type of explanation, psychosocial structure, includes the development of routines of Internet use that confine that use to conventional activity. It also includes the decline of traditional political organization, which reduces participation incentives. Ultimately, however, attention and structure serve only as deterrents, not as bars to revitalization. Political disinterest serves as the final bar. This disinterest can best be understood as due to developmental factors that serve as a crucial impediment to a flourishing e–public sphere.

[1]  L. Ross,et al.  Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. , 1996 .

[2]  L. Kohlberg,et al.  Moral judgment and moral action: A reanalysis of Haan, Smith, and Block's (1968) Free Speech Movement data. , 1987 .

[3]  P. Converse.  The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics , 2004 .

[4]  James R. Rest.  Development in Judging Moral Issues , 1979 .

[5]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[6]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 2000 .

[7]  Michael X. Delli Carpini,et al.  Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation , 2002 .

[8]  R. Lane.  Political life : why people get involved in politics , 1959 .

[9]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills , 2002, First Monday.

[10]  Lawrence J. Walker,et al.  Sex Differences in the Development of Moral Reasoning: A Critical Review. , 1984 .

[11]  Donald R. Kinder.  Pale democracy: Opinion and action in postwar America , 2004 .

[12]  C. Pateman.  Participation and democratic theory , 1970 .

[13]  P. Muhlberger.  Moral Reasoning Effects on Political Participation , 2000 .

[14]  T. Skocpol.  Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life , 2003 .

[15]  J. Habermas.  Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action , 1990 .

[16]  Michael Chapman,et al.  Constructive Evolution: Origins and Development of Piaget's Thought , 1988 .

[17]  S. Tefft.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2002 .

[18]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. , 1987 .

[19]  Russell Spears,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication, De-Individuation and Group Decision-Making , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[20]  C. Gilligan.  In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development , 2009 .

[21]  B. Barber.  Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age , 1985 .

[22]  D. Hindman.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[23]  Mira Sotirovic,et al.  A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies , 2001 .

[24]  James R. Rest.  Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory , 1986 .

[25]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[26]  C. Carver,et al.  Themes and issues in the self-regulation of behavior. , 1999 .

[27]  C. Carver,et al.  Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior , 1981 .

[28]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[29]  E. Higgins,et al.  Handbook of motivation and cognition : foundations of social behavior , 1991 .

[30]  U. Beck.  The reinvention of politics , 1996 .

[31]  A. Blasi,et al.  Bridging Moral Cognition and Moral Action: A Critical Review of the Literature. , 1980 .

[32]  R. Koestner,et al.  Identified and introjected forms of political internalization: extending self-determination theory. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  F. C. P. Motta.  The theory of communicative action , 1991 .

[34]  H. M. Schroder,et al.  Human Information Processing: Individuals and Groups Functioning in Complex Situations , 1970 .

[35]  L. Huddy.  From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory , 2001 .

[36]  R. Ryan,et al.  Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  P. Tetlock.  The Impact of Accountability on Judgment and Choice: Toward A Social Contingency Model , 1992 .

[38]  L. Kohlberg,et al.  The psychology of moral development : the nature and validity of moral stages , 1984 .

[39]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[40]  G. E. Lang,et al.  The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate , 1987 .

[41]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  Deliberative Polling and Policy Outcomes: Electric Utility Issues in Texas , 1999 .

[42]  R. Morrison.  Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist , 1936 .

[43]  A. Giddens,et al.  Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order , 1994 .

[44]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy , 1995 .

[45]  Richard M. Sorrentino,et al.  Motivational Facets of the Self , 2005 .

[46]  Ada W. Finifter,et al.  Political science : the state of the discipline , 1983 .

[47]  John R. Hibbing,et al.  Stealth Democracy: Americans' Beliefs About How Government Should Work , 2002 .

[48]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society , 1989 .

[49]  Steven J. Rosenstone,et al.  Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America , 1993 .