Differential Equations and Cellular Automata Models of the Growth of Cell Cultures and Transformation Foci

Two different modeling approaches are discussed in the study of in vitro cell cultures which, after exposure to a carcinogen, may develop transformation foci that may be considered the in vitro analogue of tumors. The most important variables that are measured in these tests are the number of foci found at the end of the experiment, starting from a different number of initial cells. It is shown that an approach based upon ordinary differential equations (ODEs) may fit the data, but in a fragile way, while a cellular automata (CA) approach provides a robust agreement. However, the story told here is not that of a conflict, but rather of a cooperation between the two modeling approaches: the results of the ODE study guided our exploration of the different alternatives in CA simulations, and provided checks during model development and testing. The CA model led us to consider the importance of the initial seeds, a point which has not been stressed in the previous literature, and to reinterpret published experimental data. It is shown that CA models, which retain cell individuality, can handle this aspect in a straightforward way, which would have been very difficult to introduce in methods based upon partial differential equations. It is also shown that quantitative modeling provides useful insights for the interpretation of experimental data as well as suggestions for further experiments.

[1]  Stefania Bandini,et al.  Cellular automata: From a theoretical parallel computational model to its application to complex systems , 2001, Parallel Comput..

[2]  W. Thilly,et al.  Cell density dependence of focus formation in the C3H/10T1/2 transformation assay. , 1977, Cancer research.

[3]  A. Kronenberg,et al.  Radiation-induced genomic instability. , 1994, International journal of radiation biology.

[4]  Roberto Serra,et al.  A Cellular Automata Model of Soil Bioremediation , 1997, Complex Syst..

[5]  P. Haccou Mathematical Models of Biology , 2022 .

[6]  Mike Mannion,et al.  Complex systems , 1997, Proceedings International Conference and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems.

[7]  Nicola Bellomo,et al.  A Survey of Models for Tumor-Immune System Dynamics , 1996 .

[8]  R. Tennant,et al.  Transformation of BALB/c-3T3 cells: V. Transformation responses of 168 chemicals compared with mutagenicity in Salmonella and carcinogenicity in rodent bioassays. , 1993, Environmental health perspectives.

[9]  S Parodi,et al.  Nongenotoxic carcinogens: development of detection methods based on mechanisms: a European project. , 1996, Mutation research.

[10]  G B Ermentrout,et al.  Cellular automata approaches to biological modeling. , 1993, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  L. Preziosi,et al.  Modelling and mathematical problems related to tumor evolution and its interaction with the immune system , 2000 .

[12]  A. Balmain,et al.  Cell‐cell communication and growth control of normal and cancer cells: Evidence and hypothesis , 1993 .

[13]  P E Seiden,et al.  A model for simulating cognate recognition and response in the immune system. , 1992, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  Andrew Wuensche Basins of attraction in cellular automata , 2000 .

[15]  J. Bertram,et al.  Quantitative neoplastic transformation of C3H/10T1/2 fibroblasts: dependence upon the size of the initiated cell colony at confluence. , 1983, Cancer research.

[16]  Tommaso Toffoli,et al.  Cellular Automata Machines , 1987, Complex Syst..

[17]  S Grilli,et al.  Effects of the protease inhibitor antipain on cell malignant transformation. , 1999, Anticancer research.

[18]  J. Little Cellular mechanisms of oncogenic transformation in vitro. , 1985, IARC scientific publications.

[19]  W. E. Gye,et al.  CANCER RESEARCH , 1923, British medical journal.

[20]  X. Zheng,et al.  A cellular automaton model of cancerous growth. , 1993, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  J. Little,et al.  Timing of the steps in transformation of C3H 10T½ cells by X-irradiation , 1984, Nature.

[22]  S Torquato,et al.  Simulated brain tumor growth dynamics using a three-dimensional cellular automaton. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  J. Little,et al.  Relationship between x-ray exposure and malignant transformation in C3H 10T1/2 cells. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  F. Moriarty Book reviewTransformation assay of established cell lines: Mechanisms and application: Edited by T. Kakunaga and H. Yamasaki. Oxford University Press for the International Agency for Research on Cancer (No. 67), 1986. Pp. 225. ISBN 92 832 1167 7. Price: £20.00 , 1986 .

[25]  Arthur W. Burks,et al.  Essays on cellular automata , 1970 .

[26]  B. Phillips Transformation assay of established cell lines: Mechanisms and application: Edited by T. Kakunaga & H. Yamasaki. IARC Scient. Publ. no. 67. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, 1985. pp. 225. £20.00 (available through Oxford University Press). ISBN 92-832-1167-7 , 1987 .

[27]  Roberto Serra,et al.  Complex Systems and Cognitive Processes , 1990, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.