Methodology to Optimize Quality Costs in Manufacturing Based on Multi-Criteria Analysis and Lean Strategies

Manufacturing quality cost optimization is a priority in any manufacturing sector due to quality issues impacting companies’ reputations and has financial consequences. Quality costs are composed of tangible and intangible costs, however, only tangible costs used to be analyzed because there is no suitable methodology for measuring intangible costs. In this context, an innovative decision support system is developed with an empirical base, applying Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Analytical Network Process (ANP), and Lean methodology to reduce all quality costs in an efficient way. In quality departments, perceptions, thoughts, and judgments (intangible costs) are not measured and controlled. This study develops an innovative methodology that allows to address this issue in an effective way. Another major innovation is the application of both multi-criteria methodologies to obtain the best combined result for decision making and the optimization of this result, developing an effort–impact matrix based on Lean manufacturing methodology. This system speeds up the decision-making process and assures its efficiency for quality department applications. Moreover, this decision support system may be applicable to any manufacturing sector.

[1]  P. Križan,et al.  Implementation of AHP Methodology for the Evaluation and Selection Process of a Reverse Engineering Scanning System , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[2]  Dimitris Kiritsis,et al.  Product Quality Improvement Policies in Industry 4.0: Characteristics, Enabling Factors, Barriers, and Evolution Toward Zero Defect Manufacturing , 2020, Frontiers in Computer Science.

[3]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  Computing a common preference vector in a complex multi-actor and multi-group decision system in Analytic Hierarchy Process context , 2019, Annals of Operations Research.

[4]  Dimitris Kiritsis,et al.  Zero defect manufacturing: state-of-the-art review, shortcomings and future directions in research , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[5]  Lorenzo Sevilla,et al.  A Multi-Criteria Cataloging of the Immovable Items of Industrial Heritage of Andalusia , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[6]  Amparo Baviera-Puig,et al.  Propuesta metodológica mediante ANP para la evaluación de las memorias de sostenibilidad del sector agroalimentario español , 2014 .

[7]  Selçuk Gören,et al.  An approach based on simulation optimization and AHP to support collaborative design: With an application to supply chains , 2011, 2011 IEEE Workshop On Computational Intelligence In Production And Logistics Systems (CIPLS).

[8]  David Chow,et al.  Applying LEAN management to automation. , 2009, MLO: medical laboratory observer.

[9]  Ching-Fu Chen Applying the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach to Convention Site Selection , 2006 .

[10]  María Teresa Lamata,et al.  Consistency in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: a New Approach , 2006, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[11]  Kim LaScola Needy,et al.  A Classification Scheme for the Process Industry to Guide the Implementation of Lean , 2006 .

[12]  Asma M. A. Bahurmoz The Analytic Hierarchy Process at Dar Al-Hekma, Saudi Arabia , 2003, Interfaces.

[13]  Ernest H. Forman,et al.  Group decision support with the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1992, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  M. Sebastián,et al.  Decision support system to decrease warranty and intangible costs in automotive industry , 2017 .

[15]  Doriana M. D’Addona,et al.  Monitoring Systems for Zero Defect Manufacturing , 2013 .