A recursively enumerable (r.e.) set is mitotic if it is the disjoint union of two r.e. sets both of the same degree of unsolvability. A. H. Lachlan has shown in [3] that there exists a nonmitotic r.e. set. In this paper we make an initial investigation into the class of mitotic sets. The following results are proved. (i) An r.e. set is mitotic if and only if it is autoreducible. (ii) There is a nonmitotic r.e. set of degree 0'. (iii) If d is an arbitrary nonrecursive r.e. degree then there exists a nonmitotic r.e. set of degree < d. (iv) There exists a maximal set which is mitotic and a maximal set which is nonmitotic. Albert R. Meyer had independently proved (ii) and (iii) for nonautoreducible sets before (i) was known. We mention one further result which is not included here but which will appear at a later date [10]. There exists a nonrecursive r.e. degree d such that every r.e. set of degree d is mitotic.
[1]
Richard E. Ladner,et al.
A completely mitotic nonrecursive r.e. degree
,
1973
.
[2]
Jr. Hartley Rogers.
Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability
,
1969
.
[3]
Richard Friedberg,et al.
A criterion for completeness of degrees of unsolvability
,
1957,
Journal of Symbolic Logic.
[4]
C. E. M. Yates,et al.
Three theorems on the degrees of recursively enumerable sets
,
1965
.
[5]
A. H. Lachlans.
The Priority Method I
,
1967
.
[6]
Gerald E. Sacks,et al.
A maximal set which is not complete.
,
1964
.