Impact of user skills and network effects on the competition between open source and proprietary software

Despite the availability of source code, deploying open source software in an enterprise environment requires skills. Recent surveys and case studies show that the skills of IT staff in an organization are one of the key factors in open source software adoption decisions. Another important factor organizations consider when choosing a platform is network effects. This paper studies how users' skills and network effects may influence the market where proprietary software competes with open source software. In the model, users make adoption decisions considering their own skills and the network effects of the software, and the proprietary software vendor prices its product strategically. It is found that in the presence of network effects, the proprietary software dominates the market when the open source software does not provide higher benefits to users. This implies that open source software, as a low-cost substitute to proprietary software, may not survive in a market exhibiting network effects. To gain market share, open source software has to outperform proprietary software by a large margin, which can be achieved when a significant portion of users are highly skilled and thus can customize the open source software to better satisfy their needs.

[1]  Dennis Fowler,et al.  Open season , 2000, NTWK.

[2]  Eric Lease Morgan,et al.  Review of The Cathedral & the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary by Eric S. Raymond, Sebastopol, Calif.: O'Reilly, 1999 , 2000 .

[3]  M. Shurmer.  An investigation into sources of network externalities in the packaged PC software market , 1993 .

[4]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Understanding open source software development , 2002 .

[5]  Fionn Murtagh,et al.  Statistics and Trends , 2002, Comput. J..

[6]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Network Effects and Microsoft , 2001 .

[8]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[9]  James Bessen.  Open Source Software: Free Provision of Complex Public Goods , 2005 .

[10]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Simple Economics of Open Source , 2000 .

[11]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[13]  Stephen E. Margolis,et al.  Network externality : an uncommon tragedy , 1994 .

[14]  Lihui Lin,et al.  Network Effects and Technology Licensing with Fixed Fee, Royalty, and Hybrid Contracts , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Justin P. Johnson.  Open Source Software: Private Provision of a Public Good , 2002 .

[16]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Satisfying Heterogeneous User Needs Via Innovation Toolkits: The Case of Apache Security Software , 2002 .

[17]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Who is liable for bugs and security flaws in software? , 2004, CACM.

[18]  Michael A. Cusumano.  Reflections on free and open software , 2004, CACM.

[19]  J. Tirole,et al.  The Economics of Technology Sharing: Open Source and Beyond , 2004 .

[20]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[21]  George F. Gilder,et al.  Telecosm: How Infinite Bandwidth Will Revolutionize Our World , 2000 .

[22]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  The Promise of Research on Open Source Software , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Richard Schmidtke.  Private Provision of a Complementary Public Good , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[24]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  A framework analysis of the open source software development paradigm , 2000, ICIS.

[25]  S. Rosen.  Learning by Experience as Joint Production , 1972 .

[26]  E. Hilgard,et al.  Theories of Learning , 1981 .

[27]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software , 2005 .

[28]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary , 2001 .

[29]  David Schuff,et al.  Managing your total IT cost of ownership , 2002, CACM.

[30]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Dynamic Mixed Duopoly: A Model Motivated by Linux vs. Windows , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Why Open Source Software Can Succeed , 2003 .

[32]  Monika Schnitzer,et al.  Public Subsidies for Open Source? Some Economic Policy Issues of the Software Market , 2002 .

[33]  Mikko Mustonen,et al.  Copyleft - the economics of Linux and other open source software , 2003, Inf. Econ. Policy.