Classification of municipal solid waste using deep convolutional neural network model applied to multispectral images

Minimization of the environmental impact of the incineration process and to produce energy efficiently are the most important considerations in obtaining efficient operation of waste-to-energy (WtE) plants. WtE operation can obtain significant improvements by predicting combustion properties of municipal solid waste (MSW) prior to incineration. Combustion properties of MSW can be assessed by estimating the weighted waste fractions such as paper and cardboard, plastic or inert and fines. Waste materials and fractions can be recognized using imaging techniques and image classification methods based on deep convolution neural networks (CNN). We have tested a new sensor system for image classification based on using multispectral (MS) images and deep CNN pretrained on the ImageNet database to recognize MSW categories. MS camera was used for sampling images above the walking floor of a WtE plant (StatKraft Varme Tiller, Trondheim). The waste load was automatically registered as industrial or household waste at the time of delivery. The MS images from 49 waste loads were used to perform transfer-learning on efficientNetB0 model weighted with ImageNet-NoisyStudent parameters. Using the predefined classes, a test and training set were generated from the 49 waste loads delivered between June and September (2020). The training set consisted of 35 waste loads while the remaining 14 waste loads were used as test. The weights for the image feature extraction was constant during training while the fully connected layer (top-layer) was updated for each epoch. The model performance on the test set was assessed by making predictions on the household or industrial waste images. With a fixed threshold value at 0.5, the model showed 85% accuracy, 92% precision, 89% recall and 90% F-measure for industrial class, while for household class the model showed 80% accuracy, 94% precision, 81% recall and 87% F-measure. For all threshold values, the area under curve estimated from the receiver operating characteristic plot showed that the model has 87% confidence in distinguishing household waste images from industrial waste images and 90% confidence in distinguishing industrial waste images from household waste images.

[1]  Zenghui Wang,et al.  Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Classification: A Comprehensive Review , 2017, Neural Computation.

[2]  Panagiotis Tsakalides,et al.  Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for the Classification of Snapshot Mosaic Hyperspectral Imagery , 2017, Computational Imaging.

[3]  Quoc V. Le,et al.  EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks , 2019, ICML.

[4]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , 2009, CVPR.

[5]  Haokui Zhang,et al.  Deep learning for remote sensing image classification: A survey , 2018, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[6]  Dimitrios Komilis,et al.  Effect of organic matter and moisture on the calorific value of solid wastes: an update of the Tanner diagram. , 2014, Waste management.

[7]  T. Otake,et al.  A RATE EQUATION FOR GAS-SOLID REACTIONS ACCOUNTING FOR THE EFFECT OF SOLID STRUCTURE AND ITS APPLICATION , 1981 .

[8]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge , 2014, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[9]  Alessandro Leone,et al.  Comparison Between Deep Learning Models and Traditional Machine Learning Approaches for Facial Expression Recognition in Ageing Adults , 2020, Journal of Computer Science and Technology.

[10]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[11]  Yunfei Lai,et al.  A Comparison of Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Image Recognition , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[12]  Quoc V. Le,et al.  Self-Training With Noisy Student Improves ImageNet Classification , 2019, 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[13]  Alaa Tharwat,et al.  Classification assessment methods , 2020, Applied Computing and Informatics.

[14]  Moh'd Abu-Qudais,et al.  Energy content of municipal solid waste in Jordan and its potential utilization , 2000 .

[15]  G Stiny,et al.  Weights , 1992, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[16]  Di Zhao,et al.  A review of the application of deep learning in medical image classification and segmentation , 2020, Annals of translational medicine.

[17]  K. Sopian,et al.  Modeling the heating value of Municipal Solid Waste , 2003 .

[18]  Lutz Prechelt,et al.  Automatic early stopping using cross validation: quantifying the criteria , 1998, Neural Networks.

[19]  Peng Wang,et al.  Comparative analysis of image classification algorithms based on traditional machine learning and deep learning , 2020, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[20]  Ferdinand Hergert,et al.  Improving model selection by nonconvergent methods , 1993, Neural Networks.

[21]  Asifullah Khan,et al.  A survey of the recent architectures of deep convolutional neural networks , 2019, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[22]  Guilherme Del Fiol,et al.  A scoping review of transfer learning research on medical image analysis using ImageNet , 2020, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[23]  David Page,et al.  Area under the Precision-Recall Curve: Point Estimates and Confidence Intervals , 2013, ECML/PKDD.

[24]  Nikolaos Doulamis,et al.  Deep supervised learning for hyperspectral data classification through convolutional neural networks , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS).

[25]  Atul Kumar,et al.  A review on technological options of waste to energy for effective management of municipal solid waste. , 2017, Waste management.

[26]  Carolina Blanch,et al.  A tiny VIS-NIR snapshot multispectral camera , 2015, Photonics West - Optoelectronic Materials and Devices.

[27]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  How transferable are features in deep neural networks? , 2014, NIPS.

[28]  Sildomar T. Monteiro,et al.  Machine learning based hyperspectral image analysis: A survey , 2018, ArXiv.