Developing a New Paradigm: Introducing the Intention-Behaviour Gap to the Privacy Paradox Phenomenon

Internet users commonly agree that it is important for them to protect their personal data. However, the same users readily disclose their data when requested by an online service. The dichotomy between privacy attitude and actual behaviour is commonly referred to as the “privacy paradox”. Over twenty years of research were not able to provide one comprehensive explanation for the paradox and seems even further from providing actual means to overcome the paradox. We argue that the privacy paradox is not just an instantiation of the attitude-behaviour gap. Instead, we introduce a new paradigm explaining the paradox as the result of attitude-intention and intentionbehaviour gaps. Historically, motivational goal-setting psychologists addressed the issue of intentionbehaviour gaps in terms of the Rubicon Model of Action Phases and argued that commitment and volitional strength are an essential mechanism that fuel intentions and translate them into action. Thus, in this study we address the privacy paradox from a motivational psychological perspective by developing two interventions on Facebook and assess whether the 287 participants of our online experiment actually change their privacy behaviour. The results demonstrate the presence of an intentionbehaviour gap and the efficacy of our interventions in reducing the privacy paradox.

[1]  A. Hayes Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[2]  L. Sommer,et al.  The Theory Of Planned Behaviour And The Impact Of Past Behaviour , 2011 .

[3]  G. Oettingen Future thought and behaviour change , 2012 .

[4]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Effects of Leader Role, Team-Set Goal Difficulty, Efficacy, and Tactics on Team Effectiveness , 1997 .

[5]  E. A. Locke,et al.  New Directions in Goal-Setting Theory , 2006 .

[6]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[7]  Mark Conner,et al.  Bridging the intention-behaviour 'gap': the role of moral norm. , 2004, The British journal of social psychology.

[8]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[9]  Young Min Baek,et al.  Solving the privacy paradox: A counter-argument experimental approach , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .

[11]  ศิวะพร ภู่พันธ์,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2018 .

[12]  Jodie A. Baird,et al.  Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  The intention–behaviour gap in technology usage: the moderating role of attitude strength , 2009, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[14]  H. Heckhausen,et al.  Deliberative and implemental mind-sets: Cognitive tuning toward congruous thoughts and information , 1990 .

[15]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal Setting Theory: The Current State EDWIN A . LOCKE AND GARY P . LATHAM , 2013 .

[16]  R. Schwarzer,et al.  Bridging the intention–behaviour gap: Planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise , 2005 .

[17]  J. Hollenbeck,et al.  An empirical examination of the antecedents of commitment to difficult goals. , 1989 .

[18]  D. Kiesler Patient experiencing and successful outcome in individual psychotherapy of schizophrenics and psychoneurotics. , 1971, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[19]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[20]  H. Heckhausen,et al.  Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind , 1987 .

[21]  Gert-Jan de Bruijn,et al.  How big is the physical activity intention-behaviour gap? A meta-analysis using the action control framework. , 2013, British journal of health psychology.

[22]  P. Gollwitzer Action phases and mind-sets , 1990 .

[23]  H. Jeff Smith,et al.  Research Commentary - Informing Privacy Research Through Information Systems, Psychology, and Behavioral Economics: Thinking Outside the "APCO" Box , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Julius Kuhl,et al.  Motivation and Self-Regulation Across the Life Span: Decomposing Self-Regulation and Self-Control: The Volitional Components Inventory , 1998 .

[25]  Aakash Taneja,et al.  Rationality-based beliefs affecting individual's attitude and intention to use privacy controls on Facebook: An empirical investigation , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  E. Higgins,et al.  Handbook of motivation and cognition : foundations of social behavior , 1991 .

[27]  Melanie Volkamer,et al.  Explaining the privacy paradox: A systematic review of literature investigating privacy attitude and behavior , 2018, Comput. Secur..

[28]  Spyros Kokolakis,et al.  Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon , 2017, Comput. Secur..

[29]  E. A. Locke,et al.  A theory of goal setting & task performance , 1990 .

[30]  P. Gollwitzer Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[31]  Stephanie Bauer,et al.  The role of emotion in bridging the intention–behaviour gap: The case of sports participation , 2009 .

[32]  Menno D. T. de Jong,et al.  The privacy paradox - Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior - A systematic literature review , 2017, Telematics Informatics.

[33]  I. Gasquet,et al.  Improvement of psychometric properties of a scale measuring inpatient satisfaction with care: a better response rate and a reduction of the ceiling effect , 2007, BMC Health Services Research.

[34]  S. Dorn,et al.  Molecular genetics and genomics generate new insights into invertebrate pest invasions , 2013, Evolutionary applications.

[35]  R. LaPiere Attitudes vs Actions. 1934. , 1934, International journal of epidemiology.

[36]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  The power of self-persuasion. , 1999 .

[37]  Sabine Trepte,et al.  Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in‐depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors , 2015 .

[38]  P. Gollwitzer The Implementation of Identity Intentions: A Motivational-Volitional Perspective on Symbolic Self-Completion , 1987 .

[39]  H. Klein,et al.  The assessment of commitment: advantages of a unidimensional, target-free approach. , 2014, The Journal of applied psychology.

[40]  S. Shavitt,et al.  Persuasion: Psychological Insights and Perspectives , 1994 .

[41]  J. Bargh,et al.  The psychology of action : linking cognition and motivation to behavior , 1999 .

[42]  Charles D. Barrett Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[43]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  CARRYOVER EFFECTS IN ATTITUDE SURVEYS , 1989 .

[44]  Gerald R. Salancik,et al.  Commitment is too easy , 1977 .

[45]  P. Sheeran Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review , 2002 .

[46]  H. Klein,et al.  Reconceptualizing Workplace Commitment to Redress a Stretched Construct: Revisiting Assumptions and Removing Confounds , 2012 .