From Iconic Design to Lost Luggage: Innovation at Heathrow Terminal 5

This paper aims to contribute to understanding of how organizations respond to risk and uncertainty by combining and balancing routines and innovation. It shows how approaches to risk and uncertainty are shaped by the contractual framework in large multi-party projects. The paper addresses a gap in the literature on how risk and uncertainty is managed to deliver innovation in large-scale ‘megaprojects’. These megaprojects are notorious for high rates of failure that conventionally evoke organizational strategies avoiding risks and uncertainties. Yet strategies for managing risk and uncertainty are essential to the routines and innovation that overcome the challenges of successfully delivering large-scale, complex projects.

[1]  O. Williamson Markets and Hierarchies , 1975 .

[2]  Ian Fugeman,et al.  Heathrow Terminal 5: delivery strategy , 2008 .

[3]  Sharon Doherty,et al.  Heathrow's Terminal 5: History in the Making , 2008 .

[4]  Roger Miller,et al.  The Strategic Management of Large Engineering Projects: Shaping Institutions, Risks, and Governance , 2001 .

[5]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  From low‐ to high‐tech project management , 1993 .

[6]  David Cleden,et al.  Managing Project Uncertainty , 2012 .

[7]  G. Richardson,et al.  The Organisation of Industry , 1972 .

[8]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[10]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  Project modes of innovation: the world after Woodward , 2010 .

[11]  P. A. Losty,et al.  A Behavioural Theory of the Firm , 1965 .

[12]  W. Starbuck Organizations as Action Generators , 1983 .

[13]  Thomas W. Lee,et al.  Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research , 1998 .

[14]  J. Barlow,et al.  Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects , 2000 .

[15]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[16]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition , 2003 .

[17]  P. Bromiley,et al.  Toward a Model of Risk in Declining Organizations: An Empirical Examination of Risk, Performance and Decline , 1996 .

[18]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[19]  C. Argyris Double Loop Learning in Organizations , 1996 .

[20]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[21]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  Deep Smarts: How to Cultivate and Transfer Enduring Business Wisdom , 2005 .

[22]  M. Hammersley Using qualitative methods , 1981 .

[23]  Arthur L. Stinchcombe,et al.  Organization Theory and Project Management: Administering Uncertainty in Norwegian Offshore Oil , 1986 .

[24]  Roger Miller,et al.  Strategizing for anticipated risks and turbulence in large-scale engineering projects , 2001 .

[25]  Andrew Davies,et al.  Innovation in Megaprojects: Systems Integration at London Heathrow Terminal 5 , 2009 .

[26]  F. Knight The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .

[27]  Joan C. Woodward Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice , 1966 .

[28]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Managing the Unknown: A New Approach to Managing High Uncertainty and Risk in Projects , 2006 .

[29]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Toward a typological theory of project management , 1996 .

[30]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[31]  Thomas P. Hughes,et al.  Human-Built World: How to Think about Technology and Culture , 2004 .

[32]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Reinventing project management : the diamond approach to successful growth & innovation , 2007 .

[33]  Audley Genus Managing large-scale technology and inter-organizational relations: the case of the Channel Tunnel , 1997 .

[34]  Andrew Davies,et al.  The Business of Projects: Managing Innovation in Complex Products and Systems , 2005 .

[35]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 1996 .