Satellite observations of atmospheric methane and their value for quantifying methane emissions

Methane is a greenhouse gas emitted by a range of natural and anthropogenic sources. Atmospheric methane has been measured continuously from space since 2003, and new instruments are planned for launch in the near future that will greatly expand the capabilities of space-based observations. We review the value of current, future, and proposed satellite observations to better quantify and understand methane emissions through inverse analyses, from the global scale down to the scale of point sources and in combination with suborbital (surface and aircraft) data. Current global observations from Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) are of high quality but have sparse spatial coverage. They can quantify methane emissions on a regional scale (100–1000 km) through multiyear averaging. The Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI), to be launched in 2017, is expected to quantify daily emissions on the regional scale and will also effectively detect large point sources. A different observing strategy by GHGSat (launched in June 2016) is to target limited viewing domains with very fine pixel resolution in order to detect a wide range of methane point sources. Geostationary observation of methane, still in the proposal stage, will have the unique capability of mapping source regions with high resolution, detecting transient "super-emitter" point sources and resolving diurnal variation of emissions from sources such as wetlands and manure. Exploiting these rapidly expanding satellite measurement capabilities to quantify methane emissions requires a parallel effort to construct high-quality spatially and sectorally resolved emission inventories. Partnership between top-down inverse analyses of atmospheric data and bottom-up construction of emission inventories is crucial to better understanding methane emission processes and subsequently informing climate policy.

[1]  F. X. Kneizys,et al.  AFGL atmospheric constituent profiles (0-120km) , 1986 .

[2]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Diurnal variation in methane emission in relation to the water table, soil temperature, climate and vegetation cover in a Swedish acid mire , 1995 .

[3]  Michael J. Prather,et al.  Time scales in atmospheric chemistry: Theory, GWPs for CH4 and CO, and runaway growth , 1996 .

[4]  Clive D Rodgers,et al.  Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[5]  Thomas Kaminski,et al.  On aggregation errors in atmospheric transport inversions , 2001 .

[6]  Ying‐ping Wang,et al.  Development of a spatially explicit inventory of methane emissions from Australia and its verification using atmospheric concentration data , 2002 .

[7]  C. Clerbaux,et al.  Trace gas measurements from infrared satellite for chemistry and climate applications , 2003 .

[8]  P. Tans,et al.  A geostatistical approach to surface flux estimation of atmospheric trace gases , 2004 .

[9]  David G. Streets,et al.  Constraints on Asian and European sources of methane from CH4‐C2H6‐CO correlations in Asian outflow , 2004 .

[10]  Ulrich Platt,et al.  Iterative maximum a posteriori (IMAP)-DOAS for retrieval of strongly absorbing trace gases: Model studies for CH 4 and CO 2 retrieval from near infrared spectra of SCIAMACHY onboard ENVISAT , 2004 .

[11]  John C. Gille,et al.  Comparative inverse analysis of satellite (MOPITT) and aircraft (TRACE-P) observations to estimate Asian sources of carbon monoxide , 2004 .

[12]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  Inverse modelling of national and European CH4 emissions using the atmospheric zoom model TM5 , 2005 .

[13]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Development of the adjoint of GEOS-Chem , 2006 .

[14]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  Satellite chartography of atmospheric methane from SCIAMACHY on board ENVISAT: Analysis of the years 2003 and 2004 , 2006 .

[15]  J. B. Miller,et al.  Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability , 2006, Nature.

[16]  R. Hoogeveen,et al.  In-flight proton-induced radiation damage to SCIAMACHY’s extended-wavelength InGaAs near-infrared detectors , 2007 .

[17]  J. Randerson,et al.  An atmospheric perspective on North American carbon dioxide exchange: CarbonTracker , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  Satellite chartography of atmospheric methane from SCIAMACHY on board ENVISAT: 2. Evaluation based on inverse model simulations , 2007 .

[19]  Christopher D. Barnet,et al.  Characterization and validation of methane products from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) , 2008 .

[20]  Colette Brogniez,et al.  Validation of ACE-FTS v2.2 methane profiles from the upper troposphere to the lower mesosphere , 2008 .

[21]  O. Hasekamp,et al.  Error analysis for CO and CH 4 total column retrievals from SCIAMACHY 2.3 μm spectra , 2008 .

[22]  Steven Pawson,et al.  Error correlation between CO2 and CO as constraint for CO2 flux inversions using satellite data , 2009 .

[23]  Chuanfeng Zhao.  Atmospheric Inverse Estimates of Methane Emissions from Central California , 2009 .

[24]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Retrieval of temperature, H 2 O, O 3 , HNO 3 , CH 4 , N 2 O, ClONO 2 and ClO from MIPAS reduced resolution nominal mode limb emission measurements , 2009 .

[25]  Ilse Aben,et al.  Retrievals of atmospheric CO2 from simulated space-borne measurements of backscattered near-infrared sunlight: accounting for aerosol effects. , 2009, Applied optics.

[26]  J. F. Meirink,et al.  Inverse Modeling of Global and Regional CH4 Emissions Using SCIAMACHY Satellite Retrievals , 2009 .

[27]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Source attribution of the changes in atmospheric methane for 2006–2008 , 2010 .

[28]  H. Worden,et al.  Observations of near-surface carbon monoxide from space using MOPITT multispectral retrievals , 2010 .

[29]  David S. Reay,et al.  Large-Scale Controls of Methanogenesis Inferred from Methane and Gravity Spaceborne Data , 2010, Science.

[30]  Michael Buchwitz,et al.  A remote sensing technique for global monitoring of power plant CO 2 emissions from space and related applications , 2010 .

[31]  Jack S. Margolis,et al.  Mapping methane emissions from a marine geological seep source using imaging spectrometry , 2010 .

[32]  D. Jacob,et al.  Intercomparison methods for satellite measurements of atmospheric composition: application to tropospheric ozone from TES and OMI , 2010 .

[33]  Vivienne H. Payne,et al.  Validation of TES methane with HIPPO aircraft observations: implications for inverse modeling of methane sources , 2011 .

[34]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  Global column-averaged methane mixing ratios from 2003 to 2009 as derived from SCIAMACHY: Trends and variability , 2011 .

[35]  Justus Notholt,et al.  The Total Carbon Column Observing Network , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[36]  P. Bernath,et al.  Ethane, ethyne and carbon monoxide concentrations in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere from ACE and GEOS-Chem: a comparison study , 2011 .

[37]  Shamil Maksyutov,et al.  TransCom model simulations of CH4 and related species: linking transport, surface flux and chemical loss with CH4 variability in the troposphere and lower stratosphere , 2011 .

[38]  M. Wirth,et al.  Sensitivity studies for a space-based methane lidar mission , 2011 .

[39]  S. Wofsy,et al.  HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO): fine-grained, global-scale measurements of climatically important atmospheric gases and aerosols , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[40]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Methane observations from the Greenhouse Gases Observing SATellite: Comparison to ground‐based TCCON data and model calculations , 2011 .

[41]  E. Dlugokencky,et al.  Global atmospheric methane: budget, changes and dangers , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[42]  M. Buchwitz,et al.  MAMAP – a new spectrometer system for column-averaged methane and carbon dioxide observations from aircraft: retrieval algorithm and first inversions for point source emission rates , 2011 .

[43]  Philippe Bousquet,et al.  Constraining global methane emissions and uptake by ecosystems , 2011 .

[44]  Susan S. Kulawik,et al.  Profiles of CH 4 , HDO, H 2 O, and N 2 O with improved lower tropospheric vertical resolution from Aura TES radiances , 2011 .

[45]  Akihiko Kuze,et al.  Toward accurate CO2 and CH4 observations from GOSAT , 2011 .

[46]  Lieven Clarisse,et al.  TES ammonia retrieval strategy and global observations of the spatial and seasonal variability of ammonia , 2011 .

[47]  Menghua Wang,et al.  The United States' Next Generation of Atmospheric Composition and Coastal Ecosystem Measurements: NASA's Geostationary Coastal and Air Pollution Events (GEO-CAPE) Mission , 2012 .

[48]  E. Kort,et al.  CH 4 and CO distributions over tropical fires as observed by the Aura TES satellite instrument and modeled by GEOS-Chem , 2012 .

[49]  P. Palmer,et al.  Seasonal variability of tropical wetland CH 4 emissions: the role of the methanogen-available carbon pool , 2012 .

[50]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Analysis of Present Day and Future OH and Methane Lifetime in the ACCMIP Simulations , 2012 .

[51]  Benjamin Poulter,et al.  Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: conclusions from a model inter-comparison project (WETCHIMP) , 2012 .

[52]  Georg Stadler,et al.  Extreme-scale UQ for Bayesian inverse problems governed by PDEs , 2012, 2012 International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis.

[53]  Lorraine A. Remer,et al.  Retrieving aerosol in a cloudy environment: aerosol product availability as a function of spatial resolution , 2012 .

[54]  Michael J. Prather,et al.  Reactive greenhouse gas scenarios: Systematic exploration of uncertainties and the role of atmospheric chemistry , 2012 .

[55]  Seongeun Jeong,et al.  On the sources of methane to the Los Angeles atmosphere. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[56]  Hidekazu Matsueda,et al.  The 2007–2011 evolution of tropical methane in the mid-troposphere as seen from space by MetOp-A/IASI , 2012 .

[57]  Henk Eskes,et al.  TROPOMI on the ESA Sentinel-5 Precursor: A GMES mission for global observations of the atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer applications , 2012 .

[58]  R. Weiss,et al.  Estimating regional methane surface fluxes: the relative importance of surface and GOSAT mole fraction measurements , 2012 .

[59]  Michael Buchwitz,et al.  Quantification of methane emission rates from coal mine ventilation shafts using airborne remote sensing data , 2012 .

[60]  Ilse Aben,et al.  Methane retrievals from Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) shortwave infrared measurements: Performance comparison of proxy and physics retrieval algorithms , 2012 .

[61]  Ilse Aben,et al.  TROPOMI aboard Sentinel-5 Precursor: Prospective performance of CH4 retrievals for aerosol and cirrus loaded atmospheres , 2012 .

[62]  Christopher D. Barnet,et al.  Mid-upper tropospheric methane retrieval from IASI and its validation , 2013 .

[63]  Jens Mühle,et al.  Characterization of uncertainties in atmospheric trace gas inversions using hierarchical Bayesian methods , 2013 .

[64]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  A multi-year methane inversion using SCIAMACHY, accounting for systematic errors using TCCON measurements , 2013 .

[65]  Scot M. Miller,et al.  Atmospheric inverse modeling with known physical bounds: an example from trace gas emissions , 2013 .

[66]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  Three decades of global methane sources and sinks , 2013 .

[67]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  The Greenhouse Gas Climate Change Initiative (GHG-CCI): Comparison and quality assessment of near-surface-sensitive satellite-derived CO2 and CH4 global data sets , 2013 .

[68]  Gabrielle Pétron,et al.  Methane emissions estimate from airborne measurements over a western United States natural gas field , 2013 .

[69]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  The greenhouse gas climate change initiative (GHG-CCI): Comparative validation of GHG-CCI SCIAMACHY/ENVISAT and TANSO-FTS/GOSAT CO2 and CH4 retrieval algorithm products with measurements from the TCCON , 2013 .

[70]  D. Easterling,et al.  Observations: Atmosphere and surface , 2013 .

[71]  Philippe Bousquet,et al.  On the consistency between global and regional methane emissions inferred from SCIAMACHY, TANSO-FTS, IASI and surface measurements , 2013 .

[72]  L. Merbold,et al.  Anthropogenic and natural methane fluxes in Switzerland synthesized within a spatially explicit inventory , 2013 .

[73]  Ilse Aben,et al.  Comparison of CH4 inversions based on 15 months of GOSAT and SCIAMACHY observations , 2013 .

[74]  R. Gordon,et al.  Biases in discrete CH4 and N2O sampling protocols associated with temporal variation of gas fluxes from manure storage systems , 2013 .

[75]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Carbon Monitoring Satellite (CarbonSat): assessment of atmospheric CO 2 and CH 4 retrieval errors by error parameterization , 2013 .

[76]  Scot M. Miller,et al.  Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[77]  Karen Cady-Pereira,et al.  Constraining U.S. ammonia emissions using TES remote sensing observations and the GEOS‐Chem adjoint model , 2013 .

[78]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  Atmospheric CH4 in the first decade of the 21st century: Inverse modeling analysis using SCIAMACHY satellite retrievals and NOAA surface measurements , 2013 .

[79]  Christopher W. O'Dell,et al.  Performance of a geostationary mission, geoCARB, to measure CO 2 , CH 4 and CO column-averaged concentrations , 2013 .

[80]  P. Dubuisson,et al.  Multispectral information from TANSO-FTS instrument - Part 1: Application to greenhouse gases (CO 2 and CH 4 ) in clear sky conditions , 2013 .

[81]  Kelly Chance,et al.  Monitoring high-ozone events in the US Intermountain West using TEMPO geostationary satellite observations , 2013 .

[82]  R. Martin,et al.  Emissions estimation from satellite retrievals: A review of current capability , 2013 .

[83]  D. Jacob,et al.  Anthropogenic emissions in Nigeria and implications for atmospheric ozone pollution: A view from space , 2014 .

[84]  Vivienne H. Payne,et al.  Impacts of updated spectroscopy on thermal infrared retrievals of methane evaluated with HIPPO data , 2014 .

[85]  M. Luo,et al.  Simulated retrievals for the remote sensing of CO 2 , CH 4 , CO, and H 2 O from geostationary orbit , 2015 .

[86]  Christopher Lietzke,et al.  The TANSO-FTS-2 instrument for the GOSAT-2 greenhouse gas monitoring mission , 2014, 2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[87]  P. M. Lang,et al.  CO 2 , CO, and CH 4 measurements from tall towers in the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory's Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network: instrumentation, uncertainty analysis, and recommendations for future high-accuracy greenhouse gas monitoring efforts , 2014 .

[88]  Zhe Jiang,et al.  Mapping of North American methane emissions with high spatial resolution by inversion of SCIAMACHY satellite data , 2014 .

[89]  Sean Crowell,et al.  Constraining regional greenhouse gas emissions using geostationary concentration measurements: a theoretical study , 2014 .

[90]  G. Manney,et al.  Derived methane in the stratosphere and lower mesosphere from Aura Microwave Limb Sounder measurements of nitrous oxide, water vapor, and carbon monoxide , 2014, Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry.

[91]  Colm Sweeney,et al.  CarbonTracker-CH 4 : an assimilation system for estimating emissions of atmospheric methane , 2014 .

[92]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Inverse modelling of CH 4 emissions for 2010–2011 using different satellite retrieval products from GOSAT and SCIAMACHY , 2014 .

[93]  Lieven Clarisse,et al.  Evaluating 4 years of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) over Europe using IASI satellite observations and LOTOS‐EUROS model results , 2014 .

[94]  E. Kort,et al.  Four corners: The largest US methane anomaly viewed from space , 2014 .

[95]  Ira Leifer,et al.  Airborne visualization and quantification of discrete methane sources in the environment , 2014 .

[96]  D. Wunch,et al.  Derivation of tropospheric methane from TCCON CH 4 and HF total column observations , 2014 .

[97]  E. Kort,et al.  Methane Leaks from North American Natural Gas Systems , 2014, Science.

[98]  D. Shindell,et al.  Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing , 2014 .

[99]  John R. Worden,et al.  Spatially resolving methane emissions in California: constraints from the CalNex aircraft campaign and from present (GOSAT, TES) and future (TROPOMI, geostationary) satellite observations , 2014 .

[100]  A. Thorpe.  Mapping methane concentrations from a controlled release experiment using the next generation Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRISng) , 2014 .

[101]  O. Schneising,et al.  Remote sensing of fugitive methane emissions from oil and gas production in North American tight geologic formations , 2014 .

[102]  Liang Feng,et al.  Estimating regional fluxes of CO 2 and CH 4 using space-borne observations of XCH 4 :XCO 2 , 2014 .

[103]  Edward V. Browell,et al.  Performance simulations for a spaceborne methane lidar mission , 2014 .

[104]  Daniel Zavala-Araiza,et al.  Toward a Functional Definition of Methane Super-Emitters: Application to Natural Gas Production Sites. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[105]  Allen L Robinson,et al.  Methane Emissions from United States Natural Gas Gathering and Processing. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[106]  John Robinson,et al.  Consistent evaluation of ACOS-GOSAT, BESD-SCIAMACHY, CarbonTracker, and MACC through comparisons to TCCON , 2015 .

[107]  Anthony J. Marchese,et al.  Constructing a Spatially Resolved Methane Emission Inventory for the Barnett Shale Region. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[108]  Daniel Zavala-Araiza,et al.  Using Multi-Scale Measurements to Improve Methane Emission Estimates from Oil and Gas Operations in the Barnett Shale Region, Texas. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[109]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Assessing 5 years of GOSAT Proxy XCH 4 data and associated uncertainties , 2015 .

[110]  Vijay Natraj,et al.  Constraints on methane emissions in North America from future geostationary remote-sensing measurements , 2015 .

[111]  T. Blumenstock,et al.  The imprint of stratospheric transport on column-averaged methane , 2015 .

[112]  Brent Nicholas Anders Brakeboer.  Development of the Structural and Thermal Control Subsystems for an Earth Observation Microsatellite and its Payload , 2015 .

[113]  Kevin W. Bowman,et al.  Improved analysis‐error covariance matrix for high‐dimensional variational inversions: application to source estimation using a 3D atmospheric transport model , 2015 .

[114]  Dominik Brunner,et al.  Validation of the Swiss methane emission inventory by atmospheric observations and inverse modelling , 2015 .

[115]  H. Bovensmann,et al.  Real-time remote detection and measurement for airborne imaging spectroscopy: a case study with methane , 2015 .

[116]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Estimating global and North American methane emissions with high spatial resolution using GOSAT satellite data , 2015 .

[117]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Quantifying lower tropospheric methane concentrations using GOSAT near-IR and TES thermal IR measurements , 2015 .

[118]  Karen Cady-Pereira,et al.  Cross-track Infrared Sounder (CrIS) satellite observations of tropospheric ammonia , 2015 .

[119]  S. Pandey,et al.  On the use of satellite-derived CH 4 : CO 2 columns in a joint inversion of CH 4 and CO 2 fluxes , 2015 .

[120]  J. Moncrieff,et al.  Quantifying methane and nitrous oxide emissions from the UK and Ireland using a national-scale monitoring network , 2015 .

[121]  Daniel J. Jacob,et al.  Balancing aggregation and smoothing errors in inverse models , 2015 .

[122]  O. Hasekamp,et al.  Geostationary Emission Explorer for Europe (G3E): mission concept and initial performance assessment , 2015 .

[123]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Satellite-derived methane hotspot emission estimates using a fast data-driven method , 2016 .

[124]  J. Peischl,et al.  Methane emissions from the 2015 Aliso Canyon blowout in Los Angeles, CA , 2016, Science.

[125]  O. Hasekamp,et al.  A large increase in U.S. methane emissions over the past decade inferred from satellite data and surface observations , 2016 .

[126]  Henry Buijs,et al.  Update on GOSAT TANSO-FTS performance, operations, and data products after more than 6 years in space , 2016 .

[127]  Adam R. Brandt,et al.  Quantifying atmospheric methane emissions from oil and natural gas production in the Bakken shale region of North Dakota , 2016 .

[128]  Simon J. Hook,et al.  High spatial resolution imaging of methane and other trace gases with the airborne Hyperspectral Thermal Emission Spectrometer (HyTES) , 2016 .

[129]  E. J. Dlugokencky,et al.  Atmospheric Methane Dry Air Mole Fractions (1983-2015) and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Dry Air Mole Fractions (1968-2015) from the NOAA ESRL Carbon Cycle Cooperative Global Air Sampling Network, original data files , 2016 .

[130]  J. Maasakkers,et al.  Gridded National Inventory of U.S. Methane Emissions. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[131]  D. Thompson,et al.  Airborne methane remote measurements reveal heavy-tail flux distribution in Four Corners region , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[132]  D. Jacob,et al.  A global wetland methane emissions and uncertainty dataset for atmospheric chemical transport models , 2016 .

[133]  Daniel J. Jacob,et al.  Modeling of Atmospheric Chemistry , 2017 .