PATTERNS OF MATING, GENERATION OF DIVERSITY, AND FITNESS OF OFFSPRING IN A GEUM HYBRID SWARM

To understand the evolutionary consequences of hybridization between the outcrossing plant Geum rivale (Rosaceae) and the selfer Geum urbanum, we tested the predictions of two simple models that assume either (A) low or (B) high pollen fitness in hybrids. Model A predicts only four genotypic classes (G. rivale, G. rivale backcross [BCR], F1, and Geum urbanum) and asymmetric introgression from inbreeding to outbreeding species. Model B predicts additional genotypic classes and potential generation of novel inbreeding lines in the hybrid swarm. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis of adults revealed only the four genotypes predicted by model A. However, microsatellite analysis of parent–progeny arrays demonstrated production of selfed offspring by F1 and BCR maternal parents and contribution of these genotypes to outcross pollen pools, as predicted by model B. Moreover, AFLP and morphological analysis showed that the offspring generation comprised genotypes and phenotypes covering the entire spectrum of variation between the two parental species, in line with model B. A common garden experiment indicated no systematic reduction in fitness of offspring derived from hybrid parents. The genetic structure of the adults in the Geum hybrid swarm cannot be explained by restricted mating patterns but may result from ecological selection acting on a diverse offspring population.

[1]  P. Hollingsworth,et al.  Early evolution in a hybrid swarm between outcrossing and selfing lineages in Geum , 2011, Heredity.

[2]  J. Balfour,et al.  Flora Of Edinburgh: Being A List Of Plants Found In The Vicinity Of Edinburgh , 2011 .

[3]  D. Field,et al.  The importance of pre‐mating barriers and the local demographic context for contemporary mating patterns in hybrid zones of Eucalyptus aggregata and Eucalyptus rubida , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[4]  D. Field,et al.  Patterns of hybridization and asymmetrical gene flow in hybrid zones of the rare Eucalyptus aggregata and common E. rubida , 2011, Heredity.

[5]  O. Lepais,et al.  REPRODUCTIVE PATTERNS SHAPE INTROGRESSION DYNAMICS AND SPECIES SUCCESSION WITHIN THE EUROPEAN WHITE OAK SPECIES COMPLEX , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  P. Hollingsworth,et al.  Significant differences in outcrossing rate, self-incompatibility, and inbreeding depression between two widely hybridizing species of Geum , 2010 .

[7]  Boris Igić,et al.  Species Selection Maintains Self-Incompatibility , 2010, Science.

[8]  L. Rieseberg,et al.  Speciation genes in plants. , 2010, Annals of botany.

[9]  S. Knapp,et al.  Asymmetric Introgressive Hybridization Among Louisiana Iris Species , 2010, Genes.

[10]  M. Gaudeul,et al.  Conservation Value of Sites of Hybridization in Peripheral Populations of Rare Plant Species , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[11]  S. Fineschi,et al.  Natural hybridisation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus pubescens Willd. within an Italian stand as revealed by microsatellite fingerprinting. , 2009, Plant biology.

[12]  Mathieu Blanchette,et al.  Long-range regulation is a major driving force in maintaining genome integrity , 2009, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[13]  Y. Suyama,et al.  Airborne‐pollen pool and mating pattern in a hybrid zone between Pinus pumila and P. parviflora var. pentaphylla , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[14]  P. Hollingsworth,et al.  Genetics, taxonomy and the conservation of British Euphrasia , 2008, Conservation Genetics.

[15]  R. Lande,et al.  Loss of Self‐Incompatibility and Its Evolutionary Consequences , 2008, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[16]  S. Wright,et al.  Genomic Consequences of Outcrossing and Selfing in Plants , 2008, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[17]  J. Busch,et al.  On the Evolution of Self‐Fertilization in a Metapopulation , 2008, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[18]  H. Jacquemyn,et al.  Landscape genetics of the self‐compatible forest herb Geum urbanum: effects of habitat age, fragmentation and local environment , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[19]  J. Kučera,et al.  Hybridization between two polyploid Cardamine (Brassicaceae) species in North-western Spain: discordance between morphological and genetic variation patterns. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[20]  J. Willis,et al.  ECOLOGICAL DIVERGENCE ASSOCIATED WITH MATING SYSTEM CAUSES NEARLY COMPLETE REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION BETWEEN SYMPATRIC MIMULUS SPECIES , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  D. Charlesworth,et al.  Impact of mating systems on patterns of sequence polymorphism in flowering plants , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  N. Frascaria-Lacoste,et al.  Assortative mating and differential male mating success in an ash hybrid zone population , 2006, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[23]  M. Arnold,et al.  Detecting Adaptive Trait Introgression Between Iris fulva and I. brevicaulis in Highly Selective Field Conditions , 2006, Genetics.

[24]  L. Rieseberg,et al.  The ecological genetics of homoploid hybrid speciation. , 2005, The Journal of heredity.

[25]  P. Hollingsworth,et al.  Conserving taxonomic complexity. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  A. Lowe,et al.  Origins, establishment and evolution of new polyploid species: Senecio cambrensis and S. eboracensis in the British Isles , 2004 .

[27]  M. Smulders,et al.  Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in Geum urbanum (Rosaceae) and their transferability within the genus Geum , 2004 .

[28]  C. Campbell,et al.  Ancient allopolyploid speciation in Geinae (Rosaceae): evidence from nuclear granule-bound starch synthase (GBSSI) gene sequences. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[29]  K. Ritland,et al.  Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci , 2002, Heredity.

[30]  E. Thompson,et al.  A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. , 2002, Genetics.

[31]  P. Morrell,et al.  Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach. , 2001, American journal of botany.

[32]  I. Dupanloup,et al.  Inferring admixture proportions from molecular data: extension to any number of parental populations. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[33]  M. Macnair,et al.  Pollen tube competition as a mechanism of prezygotic reproductive isolation between Mimulus nasutus and its presumed progenitor M. guttatus. , 1999, The New phytologist.

[34]  L. Rieseberg,et al.  PATTERNS OF MATING IN WILD SUNFLOWER HYBRID ZONES , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  D. Schemske,et al.  Quantitative trait loci affecting differences in floral morphology between two species of monkeyflower (Mimulus). , 1998, Genetics.

[36]  K. Taylor GEUM URBANUM L. , 1997 .

[37]  K. Taylor Geum Rivale L. , 1997 .

[38]  M. Arnold,et al.  NATURAL FORMATION OF IRIS HYBRIDS: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF HYBRID ZONES , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  G. Charmet,et al.  Taxonomic relationships and interspecific hybridization in the genus Lolium (grasses) , 1996, Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution.

[40]  R. Bacilieri,et al.  MATING SYSTEM AND ASYMMETRIC HYBRIDIZATION IN A MIXED STAND OF EUROPEAN OAKS , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[41]  W. Anderson,et al.  A theoretical assessment of recombinational speciation , 1995, Heredity.

[42]  M. Arnold,et al.  ASSORTATIVE MATING AND NATURAL SELECTION IN AN IRIS HYBRID ZONE , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[43]  D. Charlesworth,et al.  Allocation of Resources to Sex Functions in Flowering Plants , 1991 .

[44]  M. J. Waterway GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION AND HYBRIDIZATION BETWEEN CAREX GYNODYNAMA AND C. MENDOCINENSIS (CYPERACEAE) IN CALIFORNIA , 1990 .

[45]  M. Davies,et al.  Hybridization and ecology of Geum rivale L. and Geum urbanum L. (Rosaceae) at Malham Tarn, Yorkshire , 1989 .

[46]  K. Ritland CORRELATED MATINGS IN THE PARTIAL SELFER MIMULUS GUTTATUS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[47]  L. Gottlieb,et al.  Genetics and Morphological Evolution in Plants , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[48]  K. Ritland,et al.  A model for the estimation of outcrossing rate and gene frequencies using n independent loci , 1981, Heredity.

[49]  D. Levin HYBRIDIZATION BETWEEN ANNUAL SPECIES OF PHLOX: POPULATION STRUCTURE , 1967 .

[50]  G. Stebbins Self Fertilization and Population Variability in the Higher Plants , 1957, The American Naturalist.

[51]  E. M. Marsden‐Jones The genetics ofGeum intermedium willd. Haud ehrh., And its back-crosses , 1930, Journal of Genetics.

[52]  M. Ruhsam Evolutionary consequences of hybridization between Geum urbanum and G. rivale , 2009 .

[53]  P. Hollingsworth,et al.  Taxonomic complexity , conservation and recurrent origins of self-pollination in Epipactis ( Orchidaceae ) , 2007 .

[54]  P. Vos,et al.  AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[55]  J. Doyle,et al.  Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue , 1990 .

[56]  D. Lloyd Allocations to Pollen, Seeds and Pollination Mechanisms in Self-Fertilizing Plants , 1987 .

[57]  R. Lewin,et al.  Biological flora of the British Isles , 1948 .