Analyzing Contingency Tables by Weighted Least Squares: An Alternative to the Goodman Approach

In recent years, social scientists have been introduced to a variety of new techniques for the analysis of qualita tive data. The approach described by Leo Goodman in a series of articles (1972a, 1972b, 1973) has been the one used most frequently. Goodman's technique involves the fitting of log-linear models to contingency tables by means of an iter ative proportional fitting algorithm (see Goodman, 1971)J From the expected frequencies this algorithm generates, one can obtain estimates of the parameters that represent the fitted model; these parameters are analogous to regression coefficients. This approach makes possible the analysis of multivariate relationships involving a set of nominal vari ables. However, there are several potential drawbacks to the Goodman approach. First the specific estimating algorithm used by Goodman imposes restrictions on the types of the models which can be fitted to the table being analyzed. Specifically, users of his technique are restricted to hier archical models. With hierarchical models, if interaction terms are included in the model, the main effects comprising the interactions must also be included. A further restric tion imposed by the estimating algorithm eliminates models involving nested or conditional effects (i.e., separate main effects of one variable within levels of another variable);

[1]  M. Bartlett Contingency Table Interactions , 1935 .

[2]  Robert V. Hogg,et al.  Introduction to Mathematical Statistics. , 1966 .

[3]  V. P. Bhapkar A Note on the Equivalence of Two Test Criteria for Hypotheses in Categorical Data , 1966 .

[4]  James Fennessey,et al.  The General Linear Model: A New Perspective on Some Familiar Topics , 1968, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  G. Koch,et al.  Analysis of categorical data by linear models. , 1969, Biometrics.

[6]  C. Frank Starmer,et al.  A program for the analysis of categorical data by linear models , 1969 .

[7]  Edgar F. Borgatta,et al.  Sociological Methodology, 1969. , 1969 .

[8]  Leo A. Goodman,et al.  How to Ransack Social Mobility Tables and Other Kinds of Cross-Classification Tables , 1969, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Multivariate Analysis for Attribute Data , 1970 .

[10]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  The Analysis of Multidimensional Contingency Tables , 1970 .

[11]  H. Theil On the Estimation of Relationships Involving Qualitative Variables , 1970, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  C. Odoroff A Comparison of Minimum Logit Chi-Square Estimation and Maximum Likelihood Estimation in 2×2×2 and 3×2×2 Contingency Tables: Tests for Interaction , 1970 .

[13]  Leo A. Goodman,et al.  A Modified Multiple Regression Approach to the Analysis of Dichotomous Variables , 1972 .

[14]  Leo A. Goodman,et al.  A General Model for the Analysis of Surveys , 1972, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1972, Predictive Analytics.

[16]  Leo A. Goodman,et al.  Causal Analysis of Data from Panel Studies and Other Kinds of Surveys , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  H. Kritzer NONMET: A Program for the Analysis of Nonmetric Data by Linear Models , 1973 .

[18]  James A. Davis,et al.  Hierarchical models for significance tests in multivariate contingency table : an exegesis of Goodman's recent papers , 1973 .

[19]  Maynard L. Erickson,et al.  On Dummy Variable Regression Analysis , 1974 .

[20]  John Deegan Specification error in causal models , 1974 .

[21]  G. Koch,et al.  A program for the analysis for compounded functions of categorical data. , 1974, Computer Programs in Biomedicine.

[22]  S. Haberman,et al.  The analysis of frequency data , 1974 .

[23]  A generalized modified-chi2 analysis of categorical bacteria survival data from a complex dilution experiment. , 1975, Biometrics.

[24]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice , 1976 .

[25]  H. Kritzer Sources of Role Orientations: "Reality or Chance?" , 1975, Journal of Politics.

[26]  David Knoke,et al.  A Comparison of Log-Linear and Regression Models for Systems of Dichotomous Variables , 1975 .

[27]  R. D. Bock,et al.  Multivariate Statistical Methods in Behavioral Research , 1978 .

[28]  James A. Davis Communism, Conformity, Cohorts, and Categories: American Tolerance in 1954 and 1972-73 , 1975, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  Gary G. Koch,et al.  Strategies in the Multivariate Analysis of Data from Complex Surveys , 1975 .

[30]  Richard T. Campbell,et al.  Sociological methodology, 1976. , 1976 .

[31]  H. Kritzer NONMET II: A program for the analysis of contingency tables and other types of nonmetric data by weighted least squares , 1976 .

[32]  G G Koch,et al.  A computer program for the generalized chi-square analysis of categorical data using weighted least squares (GENCAT). , 1976, Computer programs in biomedicine.

[33]  Michael W. Gillespie Log-Linear Techniques and the Regression Analysis of Dummy Dependent Variables , 1977 .

[34]  INTERPRETATION OF GOODMAN'S LOG-LINEAR MODEL EFFECTS An Odds Ratio Approach , 1977 .

[35]  Herbert M. Kritzer,et al.  Analyzing Measures of Association Derived From Contingency Tables , 1977 .

[36]  Herbert M. Kritzer,et al.  An Introduction to Multivariate Contingency Table Analysis , 1978 .