Developing a domain-general framework for cognition : What is the best approach ?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Laura Collins. THE L2 ACQUISITION OF TENSE-ASPECT MORPHOLOGY , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
[2] B. Hayes,et al. Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study , 2003, Cognition.
[3] James L. McClelland,et al. Developing a domain-general framework for cognition: What is the best approach? , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[4] James L. McClelland,et al. Deficits in phonology and past-tense morphology: What's the connection? , 2003 .
[5] John R. Anderson,et al. Why do children learn to say “Broke”? A model of learning the past tense without feedback , 2002, Cognition.
[6] James L. McClelland,et al. ‘Words or Rules’ cannot exploit the regularity in exceptions , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[7] S. Pinker,et al. The past and future of the past tense , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[8] S. Pinker,et al. Combination and structure, not gradedness, is the issue , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[9] James L. McClelland,et al. Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence rule out? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[10] Michael Ramscar. The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require a rule , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.
[11] James L. McClelland,et al. The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.
[12] U. Hahn,et al. German Inflection: Single Route or Dual Route? , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.
[13] S. Pinker,et al. A Neural Dissociation within Language: Evidence that the Mental Dictionary Is Part of Declarative Memory, and that Grammatical Rules Are Processed by the Procedural System , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[14] Yasuhiro Shirai,et al. The Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology: A Prototype Account. , 1995 .
[15] Joan L. Bybee,et al. Regular morphology and the lexicon. , 1995 .
[16] R. Passingham,et al. Praxic and nonverbal cognitive deficits in a large family with a genetically transmitted speech and language disorder. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[17] Paul W. B. Atkins,et al. Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. , 1993 .
[18] D. Massaro,et al. Integration versus interactive activation: The joint influence of stimulus and context in perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[19] M. Gopnik,et al. Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder , 1991, Cognition.
[20] James L. McClelland. Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context on perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[21] V. Marchman,et al. U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception: Implications for child language acquisition , 1991, Cognition.
[22] James L. McClelland,et al. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.
[23] D. Massaro. Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.
[24] James L. McClelland,et al. James L. McClelland, David Rumelhart and the PDP Research Group, Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition . Vol. 1. Foundations . Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models . Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press, 1987. , 1989, Journal of Child Language.
[25] James L. McClelland,et al. The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.
[26] Morris Halle,et al. The rules of language , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.
[27] James L. McClelland,et al. The Morton-Massaro law of information integration: implications for models of perception. , 2001, Psychological review.
[28] James L. McClelland,et al. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.
[29] James L. McClelland,et al. READING EXCEPTION WORDS AND PSEUDOWORDS - ARE 2 ROUTES REALLY NECESSARY , 1992 .
[30] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .