Environmental benchmarks based on ecotoxicological assessment with planktonic species might not adequately protect benthic assemblages in lotic systems.

Freshwater ecosystems face widespread diffuse and point-source contamination. Species Sensitivity Distributions (SSDs) have been used as a tool to determine chemical concentration benchmarks that represent protective levels for most species in the environment. Here we used a SSD approach to assess on the adequacy of standard planktonic organisms to reflect the response of benthic communities, critically supporting the structure and function of lotic ecosystems. For the purpose, SSDs reflecting non-lethal responses of standard planktonic and selected benthic organisms were built based on EC50 values (collected in the literature or estimated following testing herein) regarding three model contaminants: potassium dichromate (PD), 3,5-dichlorophenol (DCP) and lead chloride (LC). The derived HC5 estimates were discriminatory between chemicals and the uncertainty associated with the estimate was remarkably low. The HC5 estimates with corresponding uncertainty were generally within the same order of magnitude for the three chemicals tested, with better discrimination between chemicals regarding their hazardous potential being achieved for benthic organisms: DCP was clearly less hazardous than PD, but LC tends to be as hazardous as PD and DCP (assuming the confidence interval ranges). Moreover, benthic communities were more sensitive to both DCP and PD, in this later case the HC5 being lower by more than one order of magnitude than that found for planktonic communities; for LC, confidence intervals overlapped, preventing a feasible assumption regarding differential sensitivity of the compared communities. Microphytobenthos was highlighted as the most sensitive group to the three tested chemicals in SSDs covering the benthic compartment, while SSDs with planktonic organisms did not consistently show trends in sensitivity ordering. Overall, our results suggest that protective benchmarks retrieved from SSDs built with the responses of standard planktonic organisms (which are the most commonly used for regulation purposes) do not adequately protect benthic communities.

[1]  C. Palmer,et al.  Risk assessment using the species sensitivity distribution method: Data quality versus data quantity , 2013, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[2]  D. Baird,et al.  A mechanistic model of contaminant-induced feeding inhibition in Daphnia magna , 1995 .

[3]  R. Schwarzenbach,et al.  Uptake, speciation, and uncoupling activity of substituted phenols in energy transducing membranes , 1996 .

[4]  M. Cristancho,et al.  The differential expression of Chironomus spp genes as useful tools in the search for pollution biomarkers in freshwater ecosystems , 2018, Briefings in functional genomics.

[5]  Martin M. F. Choi,et al.  Microcalorimetric study the toxic effect of hexavalent chromium on microbial activity of Wuhan brown sandy soil: an in vitro approach. , 2008, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[6]  D. Baird,et al.  Postexposure feeding depression: A new toxicity endpoint for use in laboratory studies with Daphnia magna , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[7]  S. Koivisto.  Is Daphnia magna an ecologically representative zooplankton species in toxicity tests? , 1995, Environmental pollution.

[8]  B. Nunes,et al.  In vitro test systems supporting the development of improved pest control methods: a case study with chemical mixtures and bivalve biofoulers , 2016, Biofouling.

[9]  G. Suter,et al.  Ecological Risk Assessment of Diffuse and Local Soil Contamination Using Species Sensitivity Distributions , 2011 .

[10]  Anthony O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian and time-independent species sensitivity distributions for risk assessment of chemicals. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Matthias Liess,et al.  Relative sensitivity distribution of aquatic invertebrates to organic and metal compounds , 2004, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[12]  N. Abrantes,et al.  Toxicity Testing with the Benthic Diatom Navicula libonensis (Schoeman 1970): Procedure Optimisation and Assessment of the Species Sensitivity to Reference Chemicals , 2014, Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology.

[13]  P. Tchounwou,et al.  Ecotoxicology of Hexavalent Chromium in Freshwater Fish: A Critical Review , 2009, Reviews on environmental health.

[14]  M. Feio,et al.  Comparing alternatives for combining invertebrate and diatom assessment in stream quality classification , 2014 .

[15]  S. Villa,et al.  Hazard / Risk Assessment TOXICITY OF INDIVIDUAL PHARMACEUTICALS AND THEIR MIXTURES TO ALIIVIBRIO FISCHERI : EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS FOR SINGLE COMPOUNDS , CONSIDERATIONS OF THEIR MECHANISMS OF ACTION AND POTENTIAL ACUTE EFFECTS ON AQUATIC ORGANISMS , 2016 .

[16]  J. Blasco,et al.  Assessing lead toxicity in the clam Ruditapes philippinarum: Bioaccumulation and biochemical responses. , 2018, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[17]  Lorraine Maltby,et al.  Fungicide risk assessment for aquatic ecosystems: importance of interspecific variation, toxic mode of action, and exposure regime. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  W. Clements,et al.  Using biodynamic models to reconcile differences between laboratory toxicity tests and field biomonitoring with aquatic insects. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Lingtian Xie,et al.  Cadmium exposure route affects antioxidant responses in the mayfly Centroptilum triangulifer. , 2011, Aquatic toxicology.

[20]  H. Ali,et al.  Bioaccumulation of non-essential hazardous heavy metals and metalloids in freshwater fish. Risk to human health , 2018, Environmental Chemistry Letters.

[21]  Graeme L. Hickey,et al.  Global Scale Variation in the Salinity Sensitivity of Riverine Macroinvertebrates: Eastern Australia, France, Israel and South Africa , 2012, PloS one.

[22]  S. Passy,et al.  Comparative Environmental Assessment in the Studies of Benthic Diatom, Macroinvertebrate, and Fish Communities , 2004 .

[23]  Donald J Baird,et al.  Using biological traits to predict species sensitivity to toxic substances. , 2007, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[24]  Patti L TenBrook,et al.  Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria. , 2009, Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[25]  J. Michałowicz,et al.  Phenols - sources and toxicity , 2007 .

[26]  Mike T. Furse,et al.  Detection of ecological change using multiple organism groups: metrics and uncertainty , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[27]  Joana Luísa Pereira,et al.  Ecotoxicological Assessment of Contaminated River Sites as a Proxy for the Water Framework Directive: an Acid Mine Drainage Case Study , 2012, Water, Air, & Soil Pollution.

[28]  L. Wolska,et al.  Toxicity studies of elemental sulfur in marine sediments , 2017, International Journal of Sediment Research.

[29]  Marco Vighi,et al.  SSD-based rating system for the classification of pesticide risk on biodiversity , 2012, Ecotoxicology.

[30]  K. Izydorczyk,et al.  Toxicity Assessment of Water Samples from Rivers in Central Poland Using a Battery of Microbiotests - a Pilot Study , 2007 .

[31]  L. Drinovec,et al.  Delayed fluorescence in algal growth inhibition tests , 2007, Central European Journal of Biology.

[32]  P. Alvarenga,et al.  Ecotoxicological endpoints, are they useful tools to support ecological status assessment in strongly modified water bodies? , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[33]  Mike T. Furse,et al.  Indicators of ecological change: comparison of the early response of four organism groups to stress gradients , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[34]  L. Reynolds,et al.  Modifications to the algal growth inhibition test for use as a regulatory assay , 2000 .

[35]  T. Hanazato,et al.  Pesticide effects on freshwater zooplankton: an ecological perspective. , 2001, Environmental pollution.

[36]  B. T. Johnson.  Microtox® Acute Toxicity Test , 2005 .

[37]  M. Ertürk,et al.  Assessment and modeling of the novel toxicity data set of phenols to Chlorella vulgaris. , 2013, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[38]  Richard K. Johnson,et al.  Linking organism groups – major results and conclusions from the STAR project , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[39]  Valery E. Forbes,et al.  Species Sensitivity Distributions Revisited: A Critical Appraisal , 2002 .

[40]  Rob S E W Leuven,et al.  Development and application of the SSD approach in scientific case studies for ecological risk assessment , 2016, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[41]  Klaus L.E. Kaiser,et al.  Photobacterium phosphoreum Toxicity Data Index , 1991 .

[42]  T. Dewitt,et al.  Assessment of Sediment Toxicity to Marine Benthos , 2018 .

[43]  Carlos Cervantes,et al.  Chromium toxicity in plants. , 2005, Environment international.

[44]  J. Lourenço,et al.  Biomarkers as a tool to assess effects of chromium (VI): comparison of responses in zebrafish early life stages and adults. , 2010, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP.

[45]  Leo Posthuma,et al.  The value of the species sensitivity distribution concept for predicting field effects: (non-)confirmation of the concept using semifield experiments , 2002 .

[46]  C. Palmer,et al.  What is Meant by “95% of Species”? An Argument for the Inclusion of Rapid Tolerance Testing , 2005 .

[47]  C. Teodosiu,et al.  Patterns of toxic metals bioaccumulation in a cross-border freshwater reservoir. , 2018, Chemosphere.

[48]  Kurt Straif,et al.  A review of human carcinogens--Part C: metals, arsenic, dusts, and fibres. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[49]  J R Wheeler,et al.  Species sensitivity distributions: data and model choice. , 2002, Marine pollution bulletin.

[50]  F. Gonçalves,et al.  Performance of standard media in toxicological assessments with Daphnia magna: chelators and ionic composition versus metal toxicity , 2011, Ecotoxicology.

[51]  Monica D. Poteat,et al.  Four reasons why traditional metal toxicity testing with aquatic insects is irrelevant. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[52]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Effects of Lumbriculus variegatus (Annelida, Oligochaete) bioturbation on zinc sediment chemistry and toxicity to the epi-benthic invertebrate Chironomus tepperi (Diptera: Chironomidae). , 2016, Environmental pollution.

[53]  K. Kaiser,et al.  Correlations of Vibrio fischeri bacteria test data with bioassay data for other organisms. , 1998, Environmental health perspectives.

[54]  Lorraine Maltby,et al.  Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: Importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems , 2005, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[55]  T. Jager.  Bad habits die hard: The NOEC's persistence reflects poorly on ecotoxicology , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[56]  M. Liess,et al.  Rank Ordering of Macroinvertebrate Species Sensitivityto Toxic Compounds by Comparison with That of Daphnia magna , 2001, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[57]  T. Gomes,et al.  Linking mode of action of the model respiratory and photosynthesis uncoupler 3,5-dichlorophenol to adverse outcomes in Lemna minor. , 2018, Aquatic toxicology.

[58]  S. Mitrovic,et al.  Determining the relative sensitivity of benthic diatoms to atrazine using rapid toxicity testing: a novel method. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[59]  J. Canton,et al.  Validation of some extrapolation methods used for effect assessment , 1993 .

[60]  D. Steinhagen,et al.  Immune response and disease resistance of Oreochromis mossambicus to Aeromonas hydrophila after exposure to hexavalent chromium. , 2006, Diseases of aquatic organisms.

[61]  Mark Crane,et al.  Better bootstrap estimation of hazardous concentration thresholds for aquatic assemblages , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[62]  Pedro M. Saraiva,et al.  Evaluation of candidate biocides to control the biofouling Asian clam in the drinking water treatment industry: An environmentally friendly approach , 2014 .

[63]  Joana Luísa Pereira,et al.  Feeding inhibition in Corbicula fluminea (O.F. Muller, 1774) as an effect criterion to pollutant exposure: Perspectives for ecotoxicity screening and refinement of chemical control. , 2018, Aquatic toxicology.

[64]  Chandra Venkataraman,et al.  A review on advantages of implementing luminescence inhibition test (Vibrio fischeri) for acute toxicity prediction of chemicals. , 2006, Environment international.

[65]  Marta Schuhmacher,et al.  Assessment of sediment ecotoxicological status as a complementary tool for the evaluation of surface water quality: the Ebro river basin case study. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[66]  Krzysztof Szoszkiewicz,et al.  Assessment of european streams with diatoms, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish : a comparative metric-based analysis of organism response to stress , 2006 .