Unsupervised inference approach to facial attractiveness

The perception of facial attractiveness is a complex phenomenon which depends on how the observer perceives not only individual facial features, but also their mutual influence and interplay. In the machine learning community, this problem is typically tackled as a problem of regression of the subject-averaged rating assigned to natural faces. However, it has been conjectured that this approach does not capture the complexity of the phenomenon. It has recently been shown that different human subjects can navigate the face-space and “sculpt” their preferred modification of a reference facial portrait. Here we present an unsupervised inference study of the set of sculpted facial vectors in such experiments. We first infer minimal, interpretable and accurate probabilistic models (through Maximum Entropy and artificial neural networks) of the preferred facial variations, that encode the inter-subject variance. The application of such generative models to the supervised classification of the gender of the subject that sculpted the face reveals that it may be predicted with astonishingly high accuracy. We observe that the classification accuracy improves by increasing the order of the non-linear effective interaction. This suggests that the cognitive mechanisms related to facial discrimination in the brain do not involve the positions of single facial landmarks only, but mainly the mutual influence of couples, and even triplets and quadruplets of landmarks. Furthermore, the high prediction accuracy of the subjects’ gender suggests that much relevant information regarding the subjects may influence (and be elicited from) their facial preference criteria, in agreement with the multiple motive theory of attractiveness proposed in previous works.

[1]  E. Jaynes Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics , 1957 .

[2]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  A Learning Algorithm for Boltzmann Machines , 1985, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  Paul Smolensky,et al.  Information processing in dynamical systems: foundations of harmony theory , 1986 .

[4]  Anita P. Barbee,et al.  "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. , 1995 .

[5]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Paul C. Martin Statistical Physics: Statics, Dynamics and Renormalization , 2000 .

[8]  R. Edler,et al.  Background Considerations to Facial Aesthetics , 2001, Journal of orthodontics.

[9]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[10]  Farhad B Naini,et al.  The enigma of facial beauty: esthetics, proportions, deformity, and controversy. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  Eytan Ruppin,et al.  Facial Attractiveness: Beauty and the Machine , 2006, Neural Computation.

[12]  David I. Perrett,et al.  What is good is beautiful: Face preference reflects desired personality , 2006 .

[13]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population , 2005, Nature.

[14]  A. Maritan,et al.  Using the principle of entropy maximization to infer genetic interaction networks from gene expression patterns , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Fu Jie Huang,et al.  A Tutorial on Energy-Based Learning , 2006 .

[16]  Jonathon Shlens,et al.  The Structure of Multi-Neuron Firing Patterns in Primate Retina , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Hatice Gunes,et al.  Assessing facial beauty through proportion analysis by image processing and supervised learning , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[18]  Johannes Hönekopp,et al.  Once more: is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  G. Rhodes The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  W. Bialek,et al.  Rediscovering the power of pairwise interactions , 2007, 0712.4397.

[21]  A. Todorov,et al.  The functional basis of face evaluation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  John M. Beggs,et al.  A Maximum Entropy Model Applied to Spatial and Temporal Correlations from Cortical Networks In Vitro , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Spin glass models for a network of real neurons , 2009, 0912.5409.

[24]  Erik Aurell,et al.  Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience , 2022 .

[25]  T. Hwa,et al.  Identification of direct residue contacts in protein–protein interaction by message passing , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  K. Zilles,et al.  ALE meta-analysis on facial judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[27]  W. Bialek,et al.  Maximum entropy models for antibody diversity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  G. Rhodes,et al.  A comparative view of face perception. , 2010, Journal of comparative psychology.

[29]  W. Bialek,et al.  Statistical mechanics of letters in words. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[31]  A. Little,et al.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  C. Sander,et al.  Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  Modeling Social Perception of Faces [Social Sciences] , 2011, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[34]  W. Bialek,et al.  Statistical mechanics for natural flocks of birds , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Kevin P. Murphy,et al.  Machine learning - a probabilistic perspective , 2012, Adaptive computation and machine learning series.

[36]  Jintu Fan,et al.  Prediction of facial attractiveness from facial proportions , 2012, Pattern Recognit..

[37]  Nan Wang,et al.  An analysis of Gaussian-binary restricted Boltzmann machines for natural images , 2012, ESANN.

[38]  Christian Igel,et al.  An Introduction to Restricted Boltzmann Machines , 2012, CIARP.

[39]  Geoffrey E. Hinton A Practical Guide to Training Restricted Boltzmann Machines , 2012, Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade.

[40]  A. Little,et al.  Facial attractiveness. , 2014, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[41]  Andrea Bottino,et al.  Computer analysis of face beauty: A survey , 2014, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[42]  David Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of the Putative Ratio Rules for Facial Beauty Indexing , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Medical Biometrics.

[43]  Luigi Maria Galantucci,et al.  Is principal component analysis an effective tool to predict face attractiveness? A contribution based on real 3D faces of highly selected attractive women, scanned with stereophotogrammetry , 2014, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[44]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Neural and behavioral responses to attractiveness in adult and infant faces , 2014, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[45]  Benjamin Balas,et al.  Artificial faces are harder to remember , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  Joshua Correll,et al.  The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data , 2015, Behavior research methods.

[47]  A. Cavagna,et al.  Short-range interactions versus long-range correlations in bird flocks. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[48]  Dewen Hu,et al.  Brain responses to facial attractiveness induced by facial proportions: evidence from an fMRI study , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[49]  J. Berg,et al.  Statistical mechanics of the inverse Ising problem and the optimal objective function , 2016, 1611.04281.

[50]  J. Haxby,et al.  Data-driven approaches in the investigation of social perception , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Face-Space: A Unifying Concept in Face Recognition Research , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[52]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Changing the Personality of a Face : Perceived Big Two and Big Five Personality Factors Modeled in Real Photographs , 2015 .

[53]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  The determinants of consciousness of human faces , 2018, Nature Human Behaviour.

[54]  Laurenz Wiskott,et al.  Gaussian-binary restricted Boltzmann machines for modeling natural image statistics , 2014, PloS one.

[55]  Jie Xu,et al.  Facial attractiveness prediction using psychologically inspired convolutional neural network (PI-CNN) , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[56]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  The Code for Facial Identity in the Primate Brain , 2017, Cell.

[57]  R. Zecchina,et al.  Inverse statistical problems: from the inverse Ising problem to data science , 2017, 1702.01522.

[58]  Andrea De Martino,et al.  An introduction to the maximum entropy approach and its application to inference problems in biology. , 2018 .

[59]  Li Meng,et al.  Face Recognition: From Traditional to Deep Learning Methods , 2018, ArXiv.

[60]  A. Todorov,et al.  The eye wants what the heart wants: Female face preferences are related to partner personality preferences , 2019 .

[61]  Michael Wilson,et al.  Machine learning determination of dynamical parameters: The Ising model case , 2018, Physical Review B.

[62]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Subjectivity and complexity of facial attractiveness , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[63]  David J. Schwab,et al.  A high-bias, low-variance introduction to Machine Learning for physicists , 2018, Physics reports.

[64]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  Contributions of shape and reflectance information to social judgments from faces , 2019, Vision Research.

[65]  V. Loreto,et al.  Hamiltonian modelling of macro-economic urban dynamics , 2020, Royal Society Open Science.