Walking the Tightrope: The Balancing Acts of a Large e-Research Project

Although e-Research has received much attention and acclaim in recent years, the realities of distributed collaboration still challenge even the most well-planned endeavors. This case study of an e-Research project examines the ‚balancing acts’ associated with multidisciplinary, geographically distributed, large-scale research and development work. After briefly describing the history and organizational design of this information technology and atmospheric science research project, I identify five paradoxical challenges that cannot be resolved: research versus development, harmony versus conflict, consensus versus top-down decision making, frequency and modes of communication, and fast versus slow pacing. Although collaboration and communication technologies supported the project’s management and organization, most of the complexities faced by the team were not technological in nature. From the five paradoxical challenges associated with the project, I distill three cross-cutting issues that could be relevant to other e-Research projects of this magnitude: satisfying the multiple needs of a multidisciplinary project, managing information, and engaging all participants. I identify the practical implications of these challenges and issues, specifically that organizational and low-tech solutions – not the introduction of more sophisticated technology tools – are needed to solve these challenges and to better streamline coordination.

[1]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[2]  H. Jones,et al.  Frames of Mind , 1969, Mental Health.

[3]  L. Hudson.  Frames of Mind: Ability, Perception and Self-Perception in the Arts and Sciences , 1970 .

[4]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  Communication networks in R & D Laboratories , 1970 .

[5]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[6]  C. Gersick.  Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[7]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  A spiral model of software development and enhancement , 1986, Computer.

[8]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration , 1990, CSCW '88.

[9]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work , 1990 .

[10]  Kent L. Beck,et al.  Extreme programming explained - embrace change , 1990 .

[11]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Communication and performance in ad hoc task groups , 1990 .

[12]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[13]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Riding a Tiger, or Computer Supported Cooperative Work , 1991, ECSCW.

[14]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[15]  W. Pagonis.  Moving mountains , 1992 .

[16]  B. Pentland.  Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work , 1993 .

[17]  Jeffrey L. Cruikshank,et al.  Moving Mountains: Lessons in Leadership and Logistics from the Gulf War , 1993 .

[18]  Atul Prakash,et al.  The upper atmospheric research collaboratory , 1994, CHI '94.

[19]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Exposing the collaborative nature of data: working together in the PIT , 1996, Proceedings of 7th International Conference and Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications: DEXA 96.

[20]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Email overload: exploring personal information management of email , 1996, CHI.

[21]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  The Upper Atmospheric Research Collaboratory (UARC) , 1998, INTR.

[22]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[23]  Jerry Hirshberg.  The Creative Priority: Putting Innovation To Work In Your Business , 1999 .

[24]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  The geography of coordination: dealing with distance in R&D work , 1999, GROUP.

[25]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[27]  Alberto Leon-Garcia,et al.  Communication Networks , 2000 .

[28]  Nancy A. Staudenmayer,et al.  Coordination Neglect: How Lay Theories of Organizing Complicate Coordination in Organizations , 2000 .

[29]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Workplace Studies: The critical role of workplace studies in CSCW , 2000 .

[30]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  From Guilford to Creative Synergy: Opening the Black Box of Team-Level Creativity , 2001 .

[31]  V. Pipek,et al.  Sharing Expertise: Challenges for Technical Support , 2003 .

[32]  Madhu C. Reddy,et al.  Coordinating heterogeneous work: Information and representation in medical care , 2001, ECSCW.

[33]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Sharing Expertise: Beyond Knowledge Management , 2002 .

[34]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Introducing instant messaging and chat in the workplace , 2002, CHI.

[35]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  What is chat doing in the workplace? , 2002, CSCW '02.

[36]  Steven C. Currall,et al.  Conflict Escalation: Dispute Exacerbating Elements of E-mail Communication , 2003 .

[37]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization , 2003 .

[38]  Michele Tepper.  The rise of social software , 2003, NTWK.

[39]  Daniel Atkins,et al.  Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure , 2003 .

[40]  D. Yanow.  Translating Local Knowledge at Organizational Peripheries , 2004 .

[41]  Brian Lamb.  Wide Open Spaces: Wikis Ready or Not , 2004 .

[42]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Meetings of the Board: The Impact of Scheduling Medium on Long Term Group Coordination in Software Development , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[43]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries , 2005 .

[44]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Enterprise Knowledge Management and Emerging Technologies , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[45]  K. Schmidt.  The critical role of workplace studies in CSCW , 2008 .