Modelling the extent of northern peat soil and its uncertainty with Sentinel: Scotland as example of highly cloudy region

Abstract Mapping the extent and locations of peatland at landscape scale has implications for carbon inventories, conservation and ecosystem services assessments. The main aim of this paper was to model and map the extent of northern peat soils while taking into account its uncertainty, and in particular exploring: 1. the use of radar Sentinel 1 as alternative to optical sensors to reduce problems due to clouds while taking advantage of the seasonality changes and 2. the use of deep learning for peat classification and as application of Digital Soil Mapping. The data sets defining presence or absence of peat in the soil were obtained from different sources and different sampling schemes, densities and distributions. Scotland was used as test case, because of its cloudy weather and fragmented distribution of different types of peat. An extension of the scorpan-kriging approach was used. The trend was estimated with different approaches: Generalized Additive Models, RandomForest and deep learning (convolutional neural networks). Each approach produced the probability of belonging to a class and the predicted class for each pixel. The results were assessed using out-of-sample measures. In this study 108 combinations of data sets and models (including trend approaches, sets of covariates and modelling of the spatial structure) were assessed. Overall, spatially explicit models performed better. The choice of the statistical method can have a significant impact on the predictive performances, while the sets of environmental covariates had a lower impact. Sentinel-1 with morphological features proved to be a good alternative to optical data for peat mapping. It is important to have balanced data sets representing the distribution of the data, because merging heterogeneous sources of data from different populations does not necessarily improve predictions. The use of deep learning and convolutional neural network provided initial promising results. There were large differences in the modelling approaches. These differences and uncertainties need to be taken into account for further modelling such as earth surface modelling or carbon accounting.

[1]  John F. O'Callaghan,et al.  The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[2]  Knut Conradsen,et al.  Short-Term Change Detection in Wetlands Using Sentinel-1 Time Series , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[3]  Y. Sheng,et al.  A high‐resolution GIS‐based inventory of the west Siberian peat carbon pool , 2004 .

[4]  I. Woodhouse Introduction to Microwave Remote Sensing , 2005 .

[5]  David M. W. Powers,et al.  Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation , 2011, ArXiv.

[6]  Edzer J. Pebesma,et al.  Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package , 2004, Comput. Geosci..

[7]  H. Jenny Factors of Soil Formation: A System of Quantitative Pedology , 2011 .

[8]  M. Oliver,et al.  Determining nugget:sill ratios of standardized variograms from aerial photographs to krige sparse soil data , 2008, Precision Agriculture.

[9]  Max Kuhn,et al.  Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package , 2008 .

[10]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[11]  Dirk Pflugmacher,et al.  Meeting the challenge of mapping peatlands with remotely sensed data , 2008 .

[12]  David P. Roy,et al.  Remote sensing of fire severity: assessing the performance of the normalized burn ratio , 2006, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[13]  Eric S. Kasischke,et al.  Mapping boreal peatland ecosystem types from multitemporal radar and optical satellite imagery , 2017 .

[14]  B. Gao NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space , 1996 .

[15]  Jennifer N. Hird,et al.  Google Earth Engine, Open-Access Satellite Data, and Machine Learning in Support of Large-Area Probabilistic Wetland Mapping , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[16]  Geir-Arne Fuglstad,et al.  Predicting soil properties in the Canadian boreal forest with limited data: Comparison of spatial and non-spatial statistical approaches , 2017 .

[17]  Michael Dixon,et al.  Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone , 2017 .

[18]  R. Kauth,et al.  The tasselled cap - A graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat , 1976 .

[19]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  On digital soil mapping , 2003 .

[20]  Brian Brisco,et al.  Remote sensing for wetland classification: a comprehensive review , 2018 .

[21]  M. Aitkenhead Mapping peat in Scotland with remote sensing and site characteristics , 2017 .

[22]  Laura Poggio,et al.  National scale 3D modelling of soil organic carbon stocks with uncertainty propagation — An example from Scotland , 2014 .

[23]  Laura Poggio,et al.  3D mapping of soil texture in Scotland , 2017 .

[24]  L. Poggio,et al.  Bayesian spatial modelling of soil properties and their uncertainty: The example of soil organic matter in Scotland using R-INLA , 2016 .

[25]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[26]  O. F. Christensen,et al.  Change in Peat Coverage in Danish Cultivated Soils During the Past 35 Years , 2014 .

[27]  R. J. Kauth,et al.  The Tasseled Cap de-mystified , 1986 .

[28]  L. Slater,et al.  Quantifying landscape morphology influence on peatland lateral expansion using ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) and peat core analysis , 2013 .

[29]  Samuel Corgne,et al.  Mapping and Characterization of Hydrological Dynamics in a Coastal Marsh Using High Temporal Resolution Sentinel-1A Images , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[30]  Sushma Panigrahy,et al.  Comparative evaluation of the sensitivity of multi‐polarized multi‐frequency SAR backscatter to plant density , 2006 .

[31]  Bhaskar J. Choudhury,et al.  Relative sensitivity of normalized difference vegetation Index (NDVI) and microwave polarization difference Index (MPDI) for vegetation and desertification monitoring , 1988 .

[32]  Philippe Lagacherie,et al.  Evaluating Digital Soil Mapping approaches for mapping GlobalSoilMap soil properties from legacy data in Languedoc-Roussillon (France) , 2015 .

[33]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  The Ecology of Soil Carbon: Pools, Vulnerabilities, and Biotic and Abiotic Controls , 2017 .

[34]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Updating the 1:50,000 Dutch soil map using legacy soil data: A multinomial logistic regression approach , 2009 .

[35]  Jing Li,et al.  A Review of Wetland Remote Sensing , 2017, Sensors.

[36]  Budi Setiawan,et al.  Digital mapping for cost-effective and accurate prediction of the depth and carbon stocks in Indonesian peatlands , 2016 .

[37]  R. M. Lark,et al.  Airborne radiometric survey data and a DTM as covariates for regional scale mapping of soil organic carbon across Northern Ireland , 2009 .

[38]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[39]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[40]  G. Moisen,et al.  PresenceAbsence: An R Package for Presence Absence Analysis , 2008 .

[41]  David G. Rossiter,et al.  Past, present & future of information technology in pedometrics , 2018, Geoderma.

[42]  M. Schaepman,et al.  Evaluation of digital soil mapping approaches with large sets of environmental covariates , 2017 .

[43]  Kendall E. Atkinson An introduction to numerical analysis , 1978 .

[44]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.

[45]  Zicheng Yu Northern peatland carbon stocks and dynamics: a review , 2012 .

[46]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[47]  Laura Poggio,et al.  Assimilation of optical and radar remote sensing data in 3D mapping of soil properties over large areas. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[48]  Laura Poggio,et al.  Soil available water capacity interpolation and spatial uncertainty modelling at multiple geographical extents , 2010 .

[49]  André G. Journel,et al.  Modelling Uncertainty and Spatial Dependence: Stochastic Imaging , 1996, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[50]  R. Hiederer,et al.  Global distribution of soil organic carbon – Part 1: Masses and frequency distributions of SOC stocks for the tropics, permafrost regions, wetlands, and the world , 2015 .

[51]  Martín Abadi,et al.  TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems , 2016, ArXiv.

[52]  Xiuping Jia,et al.  Deep Feature Extraction and Classification of Hyperspectral Images Based on Convolutional Neural Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[53]  Robert J. A. Jones,et al.  The distribution of peatland in Europe , 2006 .

[54]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[55]  Xiao Xiang Zhu,et al.  Deep learning in remote sensing: a review , 2017, ArXiv.

[56]  Sarah Endres,et al.  Multidate, multisensor remote sensing reveals high density of carbon‐rich mountain peatlands in the páramo of Ecuador , 2017, Global change biology.

[57]  N. DiGirolamo,et al.  MODIS snow-cover products , 2002 .

[58]  H. Keskin,et al.  Regression kriging as a workhorse in the digital soil mapper's toolbox , 2018, Geoderma.

[59]  P. Keddy,et al.  Wetland Ecology: Principles and Conservation , 2000 .

[60]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Using deep learning for digital soil mapping , 2018, SOIL.

[61]  Imen Gherboudj,et al.  Soil moisture retrieval over agricultural fields from multi-polarized and multi-angular RADARSAT-2 SAR data , 2011 .

[62]  Matthew C. Hansen,et al.  Mapping wetlands in Indonesia using Landsat and PALSAR data-sets and derived topographical indices , 2014, Geo spatial Inf. Sci..

[63]  Eric P. Crist,et al.  A Physically-Based Transformation of Thematic Mapper Data---The TM Tasseled Cap , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[64]  J. Seibert,et al.  On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: evaluation of different methods based on field observations , 2005 .

[65]  S. Wood,et al.  Smoothing Parameter and Model Selection for General Smooth Models , 2015, 1511.03864.

[66]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Digital soil mapping: A brief history and some lessons , 2016 .

[67]  Ying Li,et al.  Spectral-Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Imagery with 3D Convolutional Neural Network , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[68]  S. Wood Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R , 2006 .

[69]  Laura Poggio,et al.  Regional scale mapping of soil properties and their uncertainty with a large number of satellite-derived covariates , 2013 .

[70]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .