Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography: update 2003.

Three-dimensional (3D) gadolinium magnetic reso-nance angiography (MRA) has been established as asafe and reliable technique for detection and gradingof renal artery stenosis. Due to the lack of need fornephrotoxic contrast agents and ionizing radiation,this technique is particularly attractive for patientswith kidney transplants or those with renal failure.With the introduction of high performance MRsystems with fewer upfront costs and cheaper main-tenance, the technique has gained widespread use evenin community hospitals and private practices.Despite its overall significant role in the diagnosticwork-up of patients with renal artery stenosis, the tech-nique currently faces several new challenges to beovercome. Although a reproducible quality of the 3Dgadolinium MRA images with a high level of accuracyhas been well documented in numerous studies, doubtshave been cast on the results recently by new data frommulticentre trials [1,2]. These studies question theinitially reported high sensitivities and specificitiesexceeding 95%. However, at the same time, the evolu-tion of the 3D gadolinium MRA technique itselfhas continued, and therefore new data on MRA withimproved spatial resolution might again lead to moreoptimistic results. A second problem, which has beenwell documented recently by a number of authors, isthe high interobserver variability of the technique,which directly contributes to the ambiguous results[3–5]. Thirdly, renal artery stenosis is now viewed asonly one manifestation of a systemic arterioscleroticprocess. Recent improvements of MR scanners nowallow coverage of large anatomic areas in a single scan,thereby offering the possibility to screen almost allvascular territories of the human body [6]. Finally,several studies have shown that patients with renalartery stenosis often do not improve after angioplastydespite technical success [7]. Therefore, the severity ofstenosis cannot be considered a valuable predictor ofpost-intervention improvement.

[1]  C. Altehoefer,et al.  [Preoperative examination of potential kidney transplantation donors: value of gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography in comparison with DSA and urography]. , 2000, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[2]  M Bock,et al.  Correlation of hemodynamic impact and morphologic degree of renal artery stenosis in a canine model. , 2000, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[3]  S. Textor,et al.  RENAL ARTERY STENOSIS , 1959, The Lancet.

[4]  F P Cappuccio,et al.  Renal artery stenosis: a common and important problem in patients with peripheral vascular disease. , 1994, The American journal of medicine.

[5]  M Bock,et al.  Renal artery stenosis: grading of hemodynamic changes with cine phase-contrast MR blood flow measurements. , 1997, Radiology.

[6]  J. Winterer,et al.  Präoperative Untersuchungpotentieller Nierenlebendspender: Wertigkeit der Gadolinium-verstärkten 3D-MR-Angiographie im Vergleich mit der DSA und Urographie , 2000 .

[7]  J. Debatin,et al.  Rapid magnetic resonance angiography for detection of atherosclerosis , 2001, The Lancet.

[8]  L. Axel,et al.  Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with conventional angiography versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. , 1999, Radiology.

[9]  M Galanski,et al.  Use of Doppler ultrasonography to predict the outcome of therapy for renal-artery stenosis. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced 3D MRA using SENSE , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  B. Hendry,et al.  Presentation, clinical features and outcome in different patterns of atherosclerotic renovascular disease. , 1994, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[12]  M Bock,et al.  Combined morphologic and functional assessment of renal artery stenosis using gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 1998, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[13]  G. Chatellier,et al.  Interobserver variability in the interpretation of renal digital subtraction angiography. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Michael Bock,et al.  Quantification of renal perfusion using an intravascular contrast agent (part 1): Results in a canine model , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Diagnosis of renal vascular disease with MR angiography. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[16]  A J Man in't Veld,et al.  Inter-observer variability in the angiographic assessment of renal artery stenosis. DRASTIC study group. Dutch Renal Artery Stenosis Intervention Cooperative. , 1999, Journal of hypertension.

[17]  C. Isles,et al.  Management of renovascular disease: a review of renal artery stenting in ten studies. , 1999, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[18]  B. Lévy,et al.  Coronary microvasculature alteration in hypertensive rats. Effect of treatment with a diuretic and an ACE inhibitor. , 2001, American journal of hypertension.

[19]  M. Bock,et al.  Quantification of renal perfusion abnormalities using an intravascular contrast agent (part 2): Results in animals and humans with renal artery stenosis , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  iPAT: Applications for fast and cardiovascular MR imaging , 2002 .

[21]  Michael V Knopp,et al.  Morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging of renal artery stenosis: a multireader tricenter study. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.