The Observer Effect

Founding our analysis on the Geneva-Brussels approach to the foundations of physics, we provide a clarification and classification of the key concept of observation. An entity can be observed with or without a scope. In the second case, the observation is a purely non-invasive discovery process; in the first case, it is a purely invasive process, which can involve either creation or destruction aspects. An entity can also be observed with or without a full control over the observational process. In the latter case, the observation can be described by a symmetry breaking mechanism, through which a specific deterministic observational process is selected among a number of potential ones, as explained in Aerts’ hidden measurement approach. This is what is called a product test, or product observation, whose consequences are that outcomes can only be predicted in probabilistic terms, as it is the case in typical quantum measurements. We also show that observations can be about intrinsic (stable) properties of the observed entity, or about relational (ephemeral) properties between the observer and observed entities; also, they can be about intermediate properties, neither purely classical, nor purely quantum. Our analysis allows us to propose a general conceptual characterization of quantum measurements, as observational processes involving three aspects: (1) product observations, (2) pure creation aspects and (3) ephemeral relational properties. We also discuss the important concept of non-spatiality and emphasize some of the differences and similarities between quantum and classical/relativistic observations.

[1]  S. Smets The modes of physical properties in the logical foundations of physics , 2005 .

[2]  Dirk Aerts,et al.  A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics , 1986 .

[3]  A. Gleason Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space , 1957 .

[4]  Dirk Aerts,et al.  Description of many separated physical entities without the paradoxes encountered in quantum mechanics , 1982 .

[5]  Simon Kochen,et al.  The Strong Free Will Theorem , 2008, 0807.3286.

[6]  C. Piron,et al.  Mécanique quantique : bases et applications , 1998 .

[7]  Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi,et al.  The δ-Quantum Machine, the k-Model, and the Non-ordinary Spatiality of Quantum Entities , 2011, 1104.4738.

[8]  D. Aerts,et al.  The missing elements of reality in the description of quantum mechanics of the E.P.R. paradox situation , 1984 .

[9]  B. Coecke Generalization of the proof on the existence of hidden measurements to experiments with an infinite set of outcomes , 1995 .

[10]  Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi,et al.  Ephemeral Properties and the Illusion of Microscopic Particles , 2010, 1008.2450.

[11]  Towards a framework for possible uniflcation of quantum and relativity theories , 1996 .

[12]  W. Heisenberg The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory , 1930 .

[13]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  AN ATTEMPT TO IMAGINE PARTS OF THE REALITY OF THE MICRO-WORLD , 1990 .

[14]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Probing the Structure of Quantum Mechanics Nonlinearity, Nonlocality, Computation and Axiomatics , 2002 .

[15]  Diederik Aerts BEING AND CHANGE: FOUNDATIONS OF A REALISTIC OPERATIONAL FORMALISM , 2002 .

[16]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum structures, separated physical entities and probability , 1994 .

[17]  Center Leo Apostel Relativity Theory : what is Reality ? ∗ , 1996 .

[18]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Construction of reality and its influence on the understanding of quantum structures , 1992 .

[19]  Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi,et al.  From Permanence to Total Availability: A Quantum Conceptual Upgrade , 2010, 1010.4942.

[20]  Diederik Aerts The stuff the world is made of: physics and reality , 1999 .

[21]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A mechanistic macroscopic physical entity with a three-dimensional Hilbert space description , 2001 .

[22]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The entity and modern physics: the creation-discovery- view of reality 1 , 1998 .

[23]  Diederik Aerts Framework for possible unification of quantum and relativity theories , 1996 .

[24]  J. Bell On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1966 .

[25]  B. Coecke A hidden measurement representation for quantum entities described by finite-dimensional complex Hilbert spaces , 1995 .

[26]  Simon Kochen,et al.  The Free Will Theorem , 2006 .

[27]  Diederik Aerts Quantum Mechanics: Structures, Axioms and Paradoxes , 1999 .

[28]  Diederik Aerts Reality and Probability: Introducing a New Type of Probability Calculus ∗ , 2002 .

[29]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[30]  C. Piron,et al.  On the Foundations of Quantum Physics , 1976 .

[31]  H. Poincaré La science et l'hypothèse , 1968 .