Processing parameters investigation for the fabrication of self-supported and freeform polymeric microstructures using ultraviolet-assisted three-dimensional printing

Ultraviolet-assisted three-dimensional (3D) printing (UV-3DP) was used to manufacture photopolymer-based microdevices with 3D self-supported and freeform features. The UV-3DP technique consists of the robotized deposition of extruded filaments, which are rapidly photopolymerized under UV illumination during the deposition process. This paper systematically studies the processing parameters of the UV-3DP technique using two photo-curable polymers and their associated nanocomposite materials. The main processing parameters including materials' rheological behavior, deposition speed and extrusion pressure, and UV illumination conditions were thoroughly investigated. A processing map was then defined in order to help choosing the proper parameters for the UV-3DP of microstructures with various geometries. Compared to self-supported features, the accurate fabrication of 3D freeform structures was found to take place in a narrower processing region since a higher rigidity of the extruded filament was required for structural stability. Finally, various 3D self-supported and freeform microstructures with high potential in micro electromechanical systems, micro-systems and organic electronics were fabricated to show the capability of the technique.

[1]  J. Lewis,et al.  Chaotic mixing in three-dimensional microvascular networks fabricated by direct-write assembly , 2003, Nature materials.

[2]  Y. Kim,et al.  Pulsed KrF-laser synthesis of single-wall-carbon-nanotubes: effects of catalyst content and furnace temperature on their nanostructure and photoluminescence properties , 2011 .

[3]  D. Therriault,et al.  Micro-extrusion of organic inks for direct-write assembly , 2008 .

[4]  Daniel Therriault,et al.  Ultraviolet‐Assisted Direct‐Write Fabrication of Carbon Nanotube/Polymer Nanocomposite Microcoils , 2010, Advanced materials.

[5]  T. Chou,et al.  Carbon Nanotube Networks: Sensing of Distributed Strain and Damage for Life Prediction and Self Healing , 2006 .

[6]  Young Kuk Kim,et al.  RIE texturing optimization for thin c-Si solar cells in SF6/O2 plasma , 2008 .

[7]  Jae Whan Cho,et al.  Influence of carbon nanotubes and polypyrrole on the thermal, mechanical and electroactive shape-memory properties of polyurethane nanocomposites , 2007 .

[8]  Satoshi Kawata,et al.  Finer features for functional microdevices , 2001, Nature.

[9]  Jingyan Dong,et al.  Biodegradable Photo‐Crosslinked Polymer Substrates with Concentric Microgrooves for Regulating MC3T3‐E1 Cell Behavior , 2012, Advanced healthcare materials.

[10]  N. Hu,et al.  Tunneling effect in a polymer/carbon nanotube nanocompositestrain sensor , 2008 .

[11]  R. Inführ,et al.  Photopolymers for rapid prototyping , 2007 .

[12]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  Dielectrophoretic-activated cell sorter based on curved microelectrodes , 2010 .

[13]  Martin Lévesque,et al.  Direct-write fabrication of freestanding nanocomposite strain sensors , 2012, Nanotechnology.

[14]  Chao Wang,et al.  Analytical characterization using surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) and microfluidic sampling , 2015, Nanotechnology.

[15]  I. Zein,et al.  Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[16]  Jie-Ming Chen,et al.  Electrochemical sensors based on multi-walled carbon nanotube-Nafion/spl trade/ nanocomposite film for determination of heavy metals and hydrogen peroxide , 2005, 5th IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology, 2005..

[17]  D. Therriault,et al.  Reinforcing epoxy nanocomposites with functionalized carbon nanotubes via biotin–streptavidin interactions , 2012 .

[18]  M. Khakani,et al.  Preparation and mechanical characterization of laser ablated single-walled carbon-nanotubes/polyurethane nanocomposite microbeams , 2010 .

[19]  I. Kinloch,et al.  Ultra-low electrical percolation threshold in carbon-nanotube-epoxy composites , 2003 .