How non-nestmates affect the cohesion of swarming groups in social spiders

Abstract.In social biology, it is often considered that an organized society cannot exist without exclusion behaviour towards newcomers from another nest. Unlike most vertebrate and invertebrate social species, social spiders such as Anelosimus eximius accept unrelated migrants without agonistic behaviour. Does it imply that spiders cannot recognize non-nestmates from nestmates or is there any evidence of recognition without aggression ? In order to answer this question, we studied behavioural differences between groups coming from single and mixed-nests in the overall context of swarming.Our study shows that the presence of non-nestmate conspecifics reduces the cohesion of the swarm groups during the settlement process and increases the spatial dispersion of spiders, the asymmetry in the spatial distribution being less pronounced. Individuals belonging to different nests are not as mutually attractive. This paper shows that, during the induced migration, two processes counteract each other: the amplification process resulting from the addition of silk drives individuals to form groups with non-nestmates and the recognition process reduces the cohesion of groups composed of non-nestmates. The collective decision-making during migration results from the balance between these two trends.

[1]  F. Vollrath Colony Foundation in a Social Spider , 1982 .

[2]  B. Krafft,et al.  Colony distribution of the social spiderAnelosimus eximius (Araneae, Theridiidae) in French Guiana , 1989, Insectes Sociaux.

[3]  R. Buskirk 4 – Sociality in the Arachnida , 1981 .

[4]  L Avilés,et al.  Colony Size and Individual Fitness in the Social Spider Anelosimus eximius , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[5]  W. Nentwig Social spiders catch larger prey: a study of Anelosimus eximius (Araneae: Theridiidae) , 1985, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[6]  D. Daloze,et al.  “Pheromones and Animal Behaviour” - Communication by Smell and Taste” , 2003, CHEMOECOLOGY.

[7]  Tristram D. Wyatt Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Pheromones and Animal Behaviour , 2003 .

[8]  T. Evans Kin recognition in a social spider , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  T. Wyatt Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Communication by Smell and Taste , 2003 .

[10]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Dragline Attachment Pattern in the Neotropical Social Spider Anelosimus eximius (Araneae: Theridiidae) , 1999, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[11]  R. Darchen,et al.  SOCIETIES OF SPIDERS COMPARED TO TH E SOCIETIES OF INSECTS , 1986 .

[12]  Alain Pasquet,et al.  Cooperation and Prey Capture Efficiency in a Social Spider, Anelosimus eximius (Araneae, Theridiidae) , 2010 .

[13]  P. Sherman,et al.  Kin recognition in animals , 1983 .

[14]  M. Trabalon,et al.  Does group closure exist in the social spider Anelosimus eximius ? Behavioural and chemical approach , 1997, Insectes Sociaux.

[15]  R. Furey Two cooperatively social populations of the theridiid spider Anelosimus studiosus in a temperate region , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  Factors influencing the evolution of social behaviour in Australian crab spiders (Araneae: Thomisidae) , 1998 .

[17]  Erik Erlandson,et al.  Recognition System , 1999 .

[18]  G. J. Blomquist,et al.  Chemical Ecology and Biochemistry of Insect Hydrocarbons , 1982 .

[19]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Exploratory recruitment plasticity in a social spider (Anelosimus eximius). , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  P. Hepper KIN RECOGNITION: FUNCTIONS AND MECHANISMS A REVIEW , 1986, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[21]  D. Smith,et al.  Population structure and interdemic selection in the cooperative spider Anelosimus eximius , 1996 .

[22]  C. Masson,et al.  Influence of Social Environment on Genetically Based Subfamily Signature in the Honeybee , 2000, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[23]  J. Fewell,et al.  Genetic variation and task specialization in the desert leaf-cutter ant, Acromyrmex versicolor , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Cockroach aggregation based on strain odour recognition , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  Krafft,et al.  Collective decision-making in social spiders: dragline-mediated amplification process acts as a recruitment mechanism , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Discrete dragline attachment induces aggregation in spiderlings of a solitary species , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  T. Evans,et al.  Cannibalism and kin recognition in Delena cancerides (Araneae: Sparassidae), a social huntsman spider , 2007 .

[28]  D. Turnbull Pheromones and Animal Behaviour , 2005 .

[29]  M. West-Eberhard KIN RECOGNITION IN ANIMALS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  T. Bilde,et al.  Kin recognition and cannibalism in a subsocial spider , 2001 .