Performance Gaps and Managerial Decisions: A Bayesian Decision Theory of Managerial Action

An extensive literature finds that managerial decisions matter for the performance of public organizations, yet little attention has been devoted to why managers make the decisions that they do. This article builds a theory of public management decision making based on the simple assumption that managers are concerned with performance and the performance gaps of their organization. Using a logic borrowed from bounded rationality and Bayesian decision theory, we theorize a set of prior expectations. Whether the organization meets these expectations or fails to do so is then used to specify a series of precise hypotheses about when managers make a variety of decisions including when to seek additional information, take risks, decentralize the organization, determine goals, or select a managerial strategy as well as other managerial actions. The logic of the theory can easily be extended to decisions about selecting goals or managerial strategy. We then extend the basic theory by considering multiple goals, hierarchy, and alternative theoretical approaches.

[1]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[2]  J. Knott,et al.  The impact of state governance structures on management and performance of public organizations: A study of higher education institutions , 2004 .

[3]  Daniel Carpenter,et al.  Reputation and Public Administration , 2012 .

[4]  F. E. Rourke,et al.  Bureaucracy, Politics and Public Policy , 1984 .

[5]  K. Meier,et al.  Race, Structure, and State Governments: The Politics of Higher Education Diversity , 2008, The Journal of Politics.

[6]  George A. Krause Coping with Uncertainty: Analyzing Risk Propensities of SEC Budgetary Decisions, 1949–97 , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[7]  David M. Konisky,et al.  Case Selection in Public Management Research: Problems and Solutions , 2012 .

[8]  John Betton,et al.  The Application of Population Ecology Models to the Study of Organizations , 1985 .

[9]  Wei-Ru Chen,et al.  Determinants of Firms' Backward- and Forward-Looking R&D Search Behavior , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Gregory C. Hill The Effects of Managerial Succession on Organizational Performance , 2005 .

[11]  Woodrow Wilson,et al.  The Study of Administration , 1887 .

[12]  D. Carpenter Protection without Capture: Product Approval by a Politically Responsive, Learning Regulator , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[13]  H. Greve Performance, Aspirations, and Risky Organizational Change , 1998 .

[14]  P. Ingraham,et al.  Government Performance: Why Management Matters , 2003 .

[15]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[17]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Risk Culture in Public and Private Organizations , 1998 .

[18]  K. Meier,et al.  Public Management: Organizations, Governance, and Performance , 2011 .

[19]  C. Hood A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS , 1991 .

[20]  K. Meier,et al.  Trading Speed for Accuracy? Managing Goal Conflict and Accommodation in the U.S. Unemployment Insurance Program , 2007 .

[21]  Paul C. Nutt,et al.  Comparing Public and Private Sector Decision-Making Practices , 2006 .

[22]  George A. Boyne,et al.  Executive Succession and the Performance of Public Organizations , 2002 .

[23]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  Robert D. Behn,et al.  Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures , 2003 .

[25]  W. Niskanen Bureaucracy and representative government , 1971 .

[26]  George A. Krause,et al.  Institutional Design versus Reputational Effects on Bureaucratic Performance: Evidence from U.S. Government Macroeconomic and Fiscal Projections , 2004 .

[27]  Peter Frumkin,et al.  Institutional Isomorphism and Public Sector Organizations , 2004 .

[28]  H. Rainey,et al.  Goals, Rules, and Effectiveness in Public, Private, and Hybrid Organizations: More Evidence on Frequent Assertions About Differences , 1992 .

[29]  Donald P. Moynihan,et al.  The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform , 2008 .

[30]  J. Ferejohn Incumbent performance and electoral control , 1986 .

[31]  C. D. Foster,et al.  A Strategy of Decision , 1963 .

[32]  C. Smart,et al.  Designs for crisis decision units. , 1977, Administrative science quarterly.

[33]  Charles H. Levine Organizational Decline and Cutback Management. , 1978 .

[34]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[35]  George A. Boyne,et al.  Sources of public service improvement: a critical review and research agenda , 2003 .

[36]  P. John,et al.  Does public service performance affect top management turnover , 2010 .

[37]  Daniel P. Hawes,et al.  Managing Undocumented Students , 2011 .

[38]  Managing migration: how some councils cope better than others , 2011 .

[39]  Kenneth J. Meier,et al.  Goal Displacement: Assessing the Motivation for Organizational Cheating , 2000 .

[40]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[41]  C. Lindblom THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[42]  H. Rainey Understanding and Managing Public Organizations , 1991 .

[43]  Torsten Oliver Salge,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Innovative Search: Evidence from Public Hospital Services , 2011 .

[44]  Roger G. Noll,et al.  STRUCTURE AND PROCESS, POLITICS AND POLICY: ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS AND THE POLITICAL CONTROL OF AGENCIES , 1989 .

[45]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of Firm Growth: Sequential Attention to Size and Performance Goals , 2008 .

[46]  Kevin B. Smith The Ideology of Education , 2003 .

[47]  Kathryn McDermott High-Stakes Reform: The Politics of Educational Accountability , 2011 .

[48]  Richard F. Fenno The Power Of The Purse , 1966 .

[49]  J. Berger Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis , 1988 .

[50]  A. Rutherford Organizational Turnaround and Educational Performance , 2014 .

[51]  Jitendra V. Singh Performance, Slack, and Risk Taking in Organizational Decision Making , 1986 .

[52]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change , 2003 .

[53]  P. Nielsen Performance Management, Managerial Authority, and Public Service Performance , 2012 .

[54]  C. Barnard The Functions of the Executive , 1939 .

[55]  R. R. Blake,et al.  The Managerial Grid , 1994 .

[56]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[57]  Gilbert Kelling,et al.  Fixing broken windows: Restoring order and reducing crime in , 1996 .

[58]  L. White,et al.  Introduction to the study of public administration , 1949 .

[59]  K. Meier,et al.  In Defense of Bureaucracy , 2010 .

[60]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[61]  P. V. Riper The American Administrative State: Wilson and the Founders-An Unorthodox View , 1983 .

[62]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  Public Management Reform , 2000 .

[63]  H. Rainey,et al.  Goal Ambiguity and Organizational Performance in U.S. Federal Agencies , 2005 .

[64]  K. Meier,et al.  I’ve Seen Fire and I’ve Seen Rain , 2010 .

[65]  John F. Padgett Bounded Rationality in Budgetary Research , 1980, American Political Science Review.

[66]  T. Laporte,et al.  Working in Practice But Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of “High-Reliability Organizations” , 1991 .

[67]  K. Meier,et al.  The dog that didn't bark: How public managers handle environmental shocks , 2009 .

[68]  F. Thompson The Political Economy of Public Administration , 2008 .

[69]  Kenneth J. Meier,et al.  Not With A Bang, But A Whimper , 2003 .