Objective and Subjective Effects of a Passive Exoskeleton on Overhead Work

Overhead work is a frequent cause of shoulder work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Exoskeletons offering arm support have the potential to reduce shoulder strain, without requiring large scale reorganization of the workspace. Assessment of such systems however requires to take multiple factors into consideration. This paper presents a thorough in-lab assessment of PAEXO, a novel passive exoskeleton for arm support during overhead work. A list of evaluation criteria and associated performance metrics is proposed to cover both objective and subjective effects of the exoskeleton, on the user and on the task being performed. These metrics are measured during a lab study, where 12 participants perform an overhead pointing task with and without the exoskeleton, while their physical, physiological and psychological states are monitored. Results show that using PAEXO reduces shoulder physical strain as well as global physiological strain, without increasing low back strain nor degrading balance. These positive effects are achieved without degrading task performance. Importantly, participants’ opinions of PAEXO are positive, in agreement with the objective measures. Thus, PAEXO seems a promising solution to help prevent shoulder injuries and diseases among overhead workers, without negatively impacting productivity.

[1]  Homayoon Kazerooni,et al.  Evaluation of an adjustable support shoulder exoskeleton on static and dynamic overhead tasks , 2018, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.

[2]  Michael J Agnew,et al.  Ergonomic evaluation of a wearable assistive device for overhead work , 2014, Ergonomics.

[3]  G. Borg Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales , 1998 .

[4]  Bernhard Graimann,et al.  Anticipatory models of human movements and dynamics: the roadmap of the AnDy project , 2017 .

[5]  Emilie Poirson,et al.  Experimental study of the physical impact of a passive exoskeleton on manual sanding operations , 2018 .

[6]  Eun-Kyung Kim,et al.  Measurement Methods for Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure: a Review , 2017, Clinical nutrition research.

[7]  I.L.D. Houtman,et al.  OSH in Figures: Occupational Safety and Health in the Transport Sector - An Overview , 2011 .

[8]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[9]  Terry R. Butler Exoskeleton Technology: Making Workers Safer and More Productive , 2016 .

[10]  Eurofound Sixth European Working Conditions Survey – Overview Report , 2016 .

[11]  Martin Schmauder,et al.  Good ergonomics and team diversity reduce absenteeism and errors in car manufacturing , 2014, Ergonomics.

[12]  Serena Ivaldi,et al.  Ethical and Social Considerations for the Introduction of Human-Centered Technologies at Work , 2018, 2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO).

[13]  Eiichi Yoshida,et al.  Standard Performance Test of Wearable Robots for Lumbar Support , 2018, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[14]  Frank Krause,et al.  Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load , 2016, Ergonomics.

[15]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  Joan M. Stevenson,et al.  Effect of an on-body ergonomic aid on oxygen consumption during a repetitive lifting task , 2014 .

[17]  Clark R. Dickerson,et al.  Overhead work: Identification of evidence-based exposure guidelines , 2008 .

[18]  Vincent Bonnet,et al.  Ergonomic contribution of ABLE exoskeleton in automotive industry , 2014 .

[19]  Tim Bosch,et al.  Evaluation of a passive exoskeleton for static upper limb activities. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[20]  L McAtamney,et al.  RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[21]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[22]  Gentiane Venture,et al.  Assessing neuromuscular mechanisms in human-exoskeleton interaction , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[23]  James T. Miller,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[24]  Maury A. Nussbaum,et al.  Assessing the influence of a passive, upper extremity exoskeletal vest for tasks requiring arm elevation: Part I - "Expected" effects on discomfort, shoulder muscle activity, and work task performance. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[25]  Jason C. Gillette,et al.  Electromyographic Assessment of a Shoulder Support Exoskeleton During on-Site Job Tasks , 2019, IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors.

[26]  Robert Weidner,et al.  Evaluation of a Novel Active Exoskeleton for Tasks at or Above Head Level , 2018, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[27]  J. Sluiter,et al.  Criteria document for evaluating the work-relatedness of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[28]  H. Hermens,et al.  European recommendations for surface electromyography: Results of the SENIAM Project , 1999 .

[29]  A. Voilqué,et al.  Industrial Exoskeleton Technology: Classification, Structural Analysis, and Structural Complexity Indicator , 2019, 2019 Wearable Robotics Association Conference (WearRAcon).

[30]  Maury A. Nussbaum,et al.  Assessing the influence of a passive, upper extremity exoskeletal vest for tasks requiring arm elevation: Part II - "Unexpected" effects on shoulder motion, balance, and spine loading. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[31]  S. M. Bruijn,et al.  The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on metabolic costs during lifting and walking , 2019, Ergonomics.

[32]  M. de Looze,et al.  The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work. , 2016, Applied ergonomics.

[33]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  State of the Art and Future Directions for Lower Limb Robotic Exoskeletons , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[34]  Maria Pia Cavatorta,et al.  Analysis of Exoskeleton Introduction in Industrial Reality: Main Issues and EAWS Risk Assessment , 2017, AHFE.

[35]  Xueke Wang,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of exoskeleton use on loading of the lumbar spine. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[36]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[37]  Kevin Desbrosses,et al.  Physiological consequences of using an upper limb exoskeleton during manual handling tasks. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[38]  Claudia Latella,et al.  Whole-Body Human Inverse Dynamics with Distributed Micro-Accelerometers, Gyros and Force Sensing † , 2016, Sensors.