Wavelet correlation filter for wide‐angle seismic data

A new filtering technique for single‐fold wide‐angle reflection/refraction seismic data is presented. The technique is based on the wavelet decomposition of a set of adjacent traces followed by coherence analysis. The filtering procedure consists of three steps. In the first, a wavelet decomposition of traces into different detail levels is performed. In the second, the coherence attributes for each level are evaluated by calculating cross‐correlation functions of detail portions contained in a space–time moving window. Finally, the filtered traces are obtained as a weighted reconstruction of the trace details. Each weight is obtained from the coherence‐attributes distribution estimated in a proper interval. A sequence of tests is then conducted in order to select possible optimum or unsuitable wavelet bases. The efficiency of the filter proposed was assessed by calculating some properly designed parameters in order to compare it with other standard de‐noising techniques. The proposed method produced a clear signal enhancement in high‐density wide‐angle seismic data, thus proving that it is a useful processing tool for a reliable correlation of seismic phases.

[1]  Max V. Mathews,et al.  A linear coding for transmitting a set of correlated signals , 1956, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[2]  Beat Kleiner,et al.  Exploratory data analysis in the geophysical sciences , 1980 .

[3]  S. Mallat Multiresolution approximations and wavelet orthonormal bases of L^2(R) , 1989 .

[4]  P. Heikkinen,et al.  Recording marine airgun shots at offsets between 300 and 700 km , 1991 .

[5]  Robert B. Smith,et al.  Seismic traveltime inversion for 2-D crustal velocity structure , 1992 .

[6]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Wavelets and Adapted Waveform Analy-sis: A Toolkit for Signal Processing and Numerical Analysis , 1993 .

[7]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[8]  J. Gallart,et al.  Lateral variations in the deep crustal structure at the Iberian margin of the Valencia trough imaged from seismic reflection methods , 1994 .

[9]  A. Levander,et al.  Migration of wide‐aperture onshore‐offshore seismic data, central California: Seismic images of late stage subduction , 1995 .

[10]  David L. Donoho,et al.  De-noising by soft-thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  Michael Schoenberger Optimum weighted stack for multiple suppression , 1996 .

[12]  Andrew T. Walden,et al.  Characterizing seismic time series using the discrete wavelet transform , 1997 .

[13]  Doyle R. Watts,et al.  Ground-roll suppression using the wavelet transform , 1997 .

[14]  Maurizio Fedi,et al.  Wavelet analysis for the regional‐residual and local separation of potential field anomalies , 1998 .

[15]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[16]  Tadeusz J. Ulrych,et al.  Signal and noise separation: Art and science , 1999 .

[17]  D. Luzio,et al.  Crustal structures of the southern Tyrrhenian Sea and the Sicily Channel on the basis of the M25, M26, M28, M39 WARR profiles , 2000 .