Board-invited review: the ethical and behavioral bases for farm animal welfare legislation.

Concerns about farm animal welfare vary among individuals and societies. As people increasingly consider the values underlying current farm animal production methods, farm animal welfare policy debates have escalated. Recent food animal protection policies enacted in the European Union have fueled highly contentious discussions about the need for similar legislative activity in the United States. Policymakers and scientists in the United States are apprehensive about the scientific assessment, validation, and monitoring of animal welfare, as well as the unforeseen consequences of moving too hastily toward legislating farm animal welfare. The potential impact of such legislation on producers, food prices, animals, and concerned citizens must also be considered. Balancing the interests of all stakeholders has therefore presented a considerable challenge that has stymied US policymaking. In this review, we examine the roles of ethics and science in policy decisions, discuss how scientific knowledge relative to animal behavior has been incorporated into animal welfare policy, and identify opportunities for additional refinement of animal welfare science that may facilitate ethical and policy decisions about animal care.

[1]  D. Fraser.  Assessing Animal Welfare at the Farm and Group Level: The Interplay of Science and Values , 2003, Animal Welfare.

[2]  Do domestic pigs prefer short-term to medium-term confinement? , 1998 .

[3]  T. Grandin.  The feasibility of using vocalization scoring as an indicator of poor welfare during cattle slaughter , 1998 .

[4]  D. Flock,et al.  Minimizing losses in poultry breeding and production: how breeding companies contribute to poultry welfare , 2005 .

[5]  M. C. Morris,et al.  Science, Pigs, and Politics: A New Zealand Perspective on the Phase-Out of Sow Stalls , 2004 .

[6]  W. Stricklin,et al.  A note on visual, olfactory and spatial cue use in foraging behavior of pigs: indirectly assessing cognitive abilities , 2003 .

[7]  J. Hurnik,et al.  The long-term productivity of hens housed in battery cages and an aviary. , 1996, Poultry science.

[8]  L. Estol.  Animal welfare in the veterinary curriculum. , 2004 .

[9]  I. Duncan,et al.  The implications of cognitive processes for animal welfare. , 1991, Journal of animal science.

[10]  Tom Regan,et al.  Animal rights and human obligations , 1989 .

[11]  H. Gonyou.  Experiences with alternative methods of sow housing. , 2005, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[12]  J. Mench.  Assessing animal welfare at the farm and group level: a United States perspective , 2003 .

[13]  E. Bush,et al.  Management effects on preweaning mortality: a report of the NAHMS National Swine Survey , 1996 .

[14]  B. Gremmen,et al.  Between Precautionary Principle and “Sound Science”: Distributing the Burdens of Proof , 2002 .

[15]  Donald M. Broom,et al.  Animal welfare defined in terms of attempts to cope with the environment , 1996 .

[16]  S. Wise.  The Evolution of Animal Law since 1950 , 2003 .

[17]  R. Bennett,et al.  Moral Intensity and Willingness to Pay Concerning Farm Animal Welfare Issues and the Implications for Agricultural Policy , 2002 .

[18]  M. Bracke,et al.  Qualitative Stakeholder Analysis for the Development of Sustainable Monitoring Systems for Farm Animal Welfare , 2005 .

[19]  Françoise Wemelsfelder,et al.  The Effect of Substrate-Enriched and Substrate-Impoverished Housing Environments on the Diversity of Behaviour in Pigs , 1996 .

[20]  Marian Stamp Dawkins,et al.  Battery hens name their price: Consumer demand theory and the measurement of ethological ‘needs’ , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  D. Fraser.  Animal welfare assurance programs in food production: a framework for assessing the options , 2006, Animal Welfare.

[22]  T. Regan.  The Case for Animal Rights , 1983 .

[23]  P. Thompson.  Animal agriculture and the welfare of animals. , 2005, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[24]  U. Knierim,et al.  The Development of an Epidemiologically Based On-Farm Welfare Assessment System for use with Dairy Cows , 2001 .

[25]  J. Peirce,et al.  Sheep don't forget a face , 2001, Nature.

[26]  J. Rushen.  Changing concepts of farm animal welfare: bridging the gap between applied and basic research , 2003 .

[27]  I. Duncan,et al.  Animal welfare defined in terms of feelings , 1996 .

[28]  C. Allen.  Assessing animal cognition: ethological and philosophical perspectives. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[29]  I. Duncan,et al.  Measuring preferences and the strength of preferences. , 1992, Poultry science.

[30]  M. Appleby,et al.  The European Union Ban on Conventional Cages for Laying Hens: History and Prospects , 2003, Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS.

[31]  Anna K. Johnson,et al.  REVIEWS: Compilation of the Scientific Literature Comparing Housing Systems for Gestating Sows and Gilts Using Measures of Physiology, Behavior, Performance, and Health1 , 2004 .

[32]  Duncan,et al.  Working for a dustbath: are hens increasing pleasure rather than reducing suffering? , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[33]  C. Berg,et al.  Monitoring Animal Welfare on Commercial Broiler Farms in Sweden , 2001 .

[34]  W. G. Cochran,et al.  Experimental Designs Second Edition , 1958 .

[35]  R. Bennett.  THE VALUE OF FARM ANIMAL WELFARE , 1995 .

[36]  M. Mendl,et al.  Disturbance effects of environmental stimuli on pig spatial memory , 1999 .

[37]  P. Thompson.  Animals in the agrarian ideal , 1993 .

[38]  J. Petherick,et al.  The effect of group size on the performance of growing pigs , 1989 .

[39]  J. Deen,et al.  Sow housing: opportunities, constraints, and unknowns. , 2005, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[40]  A. Lawrence,et al.  Relationship between agonistic behaviour and propensity to develop excessive drinking and chain manipulation in pigs , 1991, Physiology & Behavior.

[41]  D. Weary,et al.  A Scientific Conception of Animal Welfare that Reflects Ethical Concerns , 1997, Animal Welfare.

[42]  D. Weary,et al.  Effects of three types of free-stall surfaces on preferences and stall usage by dairy cows. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[43]  I. Duncan,et al.  Some investigations into motivation in the domestic fowl , 1987 .

[44]  L. Green,et al.  Animal Welfare Assessment in Farm Assurance Schemes , 2001 .

[45]  A. Mertig,et al.  Assessing attitudes toward farm animal welfare: a national survey of animal science faculty members. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[46]  M. Dawkins,et al.  Using behaviour to assess animal welfare , 2004, Animal Welfare.

[47]  D. Schweikhardt,et al.  Politics by other Means: The Emergence of a New Politics of Food in the United States , 2001 .

[48]  I. Veissier,et al.  Stockmanship and Farm Animal Welfare , 2003, Animal Welfare.

[49]  M. Dawkins.  From an animal's point of view: Motivation, fitness, and animal welfare , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[50]  A. Rudine,et al.  The physical size of gestating sows. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[51]  J. Rachels,et al.  The Elements of Moral Philosophy , 1986 .

[52]  A. Lawrence,et al.  A review of behavioral factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviors in pigs. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[53]  C. C. Croneya,et al.  A note on visual , olfactory and spatial cue use in foraging behavior of pigs : indirectly assessing cognitive abilities , 2003 .

[54]  Jane L. Hurst,et al.  Welfare by Design: The Natural Selection of Welfare Criteria , 1996, Animal Welfare.

[55]  T. Widowski,et al.  The influence of straw, cloth tassel, or both on the prepartum behavior of sows , 1990 .

[56]  I. Duncan,et al.  Observations on the reproductive behaviour of domestic fowl in the wild , 1978 .

[57]  G. Mason,et al.  Frustrations of fur-farmed mink , 2001, Nature.

[58]  Celeste Monforton,et al.  Manufacturing uncertainty: contested science and the protection of the public's health and environment. , 2005, American journal of public health.

[59]  D. S Arey,et al.  Time course for the formation and disruption of social organisation in group-housed sows , 1999 .