Capturing and Creating Public Opinion in Survey Research

Although consumer researchers often assume that survey responses reflect true beliefs, attitudes, and intentions, most recent research in social judgment and behavioral decision making suggests that people often construct answers to survey questions on the basis of their responses to earlier items. A framework proposed by Feldman and Lynch suggests that answers are most likely to be constructed when the respondent does not have other, more diagnostic inputs accessible in memory. Two field experiments conducted during the 1988 and 1992 presidential elections support this model. In experiment 1, when a respondent had voted for one of the candidates in the primary, voting intention was not based on earlier survey answers; when a respondent had not voted for these candidates in the primary, voting intention appeared to be constructed. Regardless of primary voting behavior, all respondents appeared to construct issue opinions. The effect of earlier answers on issue opinions decreased as the election neared, consistent with the idea that knowledge about the issues increased with time. In experiment 2, placing questions tapping primary voting behavior first affected responses to questions about specific issue opinions, with resulting carryover to a later measure of voting intention. We discuss the implications of these results for consumer judgment processes and for measurement of consumers' attitudes and intentions.

[1]  Peter Wright,et al.  State-of-mind effects on the accuracy with which utility functions predict marketplace choice. , 1980 .

[2]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Constructing reality and its alternatives: an inclusion/ exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment , 1992 .

[3]  Vicki G. Morwitz,et al.  Does Measuring Intent Change Behavior , 1993 .

[4]  Gerald R. Salancik,et al.  Attitude inferences from salient and relevant cognitive content about behavior. , 1975 .

[5]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. , 1988 .

[6]  J. Lynch On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research , 1982 .

[7]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Design and marketing of new products , 1980 .

[8]  R. Rosenthal Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[9]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Choices from Sets Including Remembered Brands: Use of Recalled Attributes and Prior Overall Evaluations , 1988 .

[10]  Preferences Scientific Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. , 1982 .

[11]  Martin Fishbein,et al.  Basis for Decision: An Attitudinal Analysis of Voting Behavior1 , 1974 .

[12]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[13]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations , 1976 .

[14]  Barbara Bickart,et al.  Carryover and Backfire Effects in Marketing Research , 1993 .

[15]  S. Presser,et al.  Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context , 1996 .

[16]  Question-Order Effects and Brand Evaluations: The Moderating Role of Consumer Knowledge , 1992 .

[17]  R. Kahn,et al.  The Dynamics of Interviewing , 1957 .

[18]  Gregory B. Markus,et al.  Political Attitudes during an Election Year: A Report on the 1980 NES Panel Study , 1982, American Political Science Review.

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[20]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Questions and answers in attitude surveys , 1982 .

[21]  Scot Burton,et al.  TASK CONDITIONS, RESPONSE FORMULATION PROCESSES, AND RESPONSE ACCURACY FOR BEHAVIORAL FREQUENCY QUESTIONS IN SURVEYS , 1991 .

[22]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  The Importance of Halo Effects in Multi-Attribute Attitude Models: , 1975 .

[23]  S. Sherman On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction. , 1980 .

[24]  R. Tourangeau,et al.  Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement , 1988 .

[25]  William E. Baker,et al.  The Relevance Accessibility Model of Advertising Effectiveness , 1991 .

[26]  Steven A. Taylor,et al.  Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension , 1992 .

[27]  Leonard L. Martin,et al.  Assimilation and contrast as a function of people's willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression. , 1990 .

[28]  R. Hastie,et al.  The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line , 1986 .

[29]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Part-Whole Question Sequences: A Conversational Logic Analysis , 1991 .

[30]  R. Wyer,et al.  Cognitive and affective bases of opinion survey responses. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.