Design Optimization for the Measurement Accuracy Improvement of a Large Range Nanopositioning Stage

Both an accurate machine design and an adequate metrology loop definition are critical factors when precision positioning represents a key issue for the final system performance. This article discusses the error budget methodology as an advantageous technique to improve the measurement accuracy of a 2D-long range stage during its design phase. The nanopositioning platform NanoPla is here presented. Its specifications, e.g., XY-travel range of 50 mm × 50 mm and sub-micrometric accuracy; and some novel designed solutions, e.g., a three-layer and two-stage architecture are described. Once defined the prototype, an error analysis is performed to propose improvement design features. Then, the metrology loop of the system is mathematically modelled to define the propagation of the different sources. Several simplifications and design hypothesis are justified and validated, including the assumption of rigid body behavior, which is demonstrated after a finite element analysis verification. The different error sources and their estimated contributions are enumerated in order to conclude with the final error values obtained from the error budget. The measurement deviations obtained demonstrate the important influence of the working environmental conditions, the flatness error of the plane mirror reflectors and the accurate manufacture and assembly of the components forming the metrological loop. Thus, a temperature control of ±0.1 °C results in an acceptable maximum positioning error for the developed NanoPla stage, i.e., 41 nm, 36 nm and 48 nm in X-, Y- and Z-axis, respectively.

[1]  Robert Schmitt,et al.  Geometric error measurement and compensation of machines : an update , 2008 .

[2]  Michael Katzschmann,et al.  Design and performance evaluation of an interferometric controlled planar nanopositioning system , 2012 .

[3]  M. Hong,et al.  Laser nano-manufacturing - State of the art and challenges , 2011 .

[4]  Ludger Koenders,et al.  Recent developments in dimensional nanometrology using AFMs , 2011 .

[5]  Samir Mekid Design strategy for precision engineering: second-order phenomena , 2005 .

[6]  Tae Bong Eom,et al.  Metrological atomic force microscope using a large range scanning dual stage , 2009 .

[7]  Fengzhou Fang,et al.  Manufacturing and measurement of freeform optics , 2013 .

[8]  Chien-Hung Liu,et al.  Design and control of a long-traveling nano-positioning stage , 2010 .

[9]  Layton Carter Hale,et al.  Principles and Techniques for Designing Precision Machines , 2013 .

[10]  Shuichi Dejima,et al.  A surface motor-driven planar motion stage integrated with an XYθZ surface encoder for precision positioning , 2004 .

[11]  Andrew J. Fleming,et al.  A review of nanometer resolution position sensors: Operation and performance , 2013 .

[12]  Sun-Kyu Lee,et al.  Uncertainty investigation of grating interferometry in six degree-of-freedom motion error measurements , 2012 .

[13]  John S. Villarrubia,et al.  THE MOLECULAR MEASURING MACHINE , 1998 .

[14]  William T. Estler,et al.  Measurement technologies for precision positioning , 2015 .

[15]  J. A. Albajez,et al.  Error budgeting as a tool for the design of a 2D moving platform with nanometer resolution , 2012 .

[16]  Ndubuisi G. Orji,et al.  Scanning probe microscope dimensional metrology at NIST , 2011 .

[17]  David L. Trumper,et al.  The long-range scanning stage: a novel platform for scanned-probe microscopy , 2000 .

[18]  Ekkard Brinksmeier,et al.  PRECISION ENGINEERING : THE EUROPEAN WAY , 2008 .

[19]  H. A. M. Spaan,et al.  Realization and calibration of the "Isara 400" ultra-precision CMM , 2011 .

[20]  T. Hausotte,et al.  Recent developments and challenges of nanopositioning and nanomeasuring technology , 2012 .

[21]  Tsu-Chin Tsao,et al.  Multi-scale Alignment and Positioning System – MAPS , 2012 .

[22]  Mmpa Marc Vermeulen,et al.  Design for precision : current status and trends , 1998 .