Behavioral adaptations of the cubozoan medusa Tripedalia cystophora for feeding on copepod (Dioithona oculata) swarms

Abstract. The cubozoan medusa Tripedalia cystophora preys on dense swarms of the copepod Dioithona oculata in the mangrove prop-root habitat of Puerto Rico. The copepod swarms form in shafts of sunlight that penetrate the mangrove canopy during the day. T. cystophora are found primarily within the same illuminated areas, feeding heavily on the dense swarms of copepods. Laboratory studies were conducted to examine the behavioral adaptations of T. cystophora that allow them to remain within these dense copepod swarms. In the presence of vertical light shafts, T. cystophora showed both a significant change in swimming speed and a significant increase in turning rate. T. cystophora turn abruptly when they leave a vertical shaft of light and quickly re-enter. The presence or absence of copepod prey, either in swarms or dispersed, had no significant effect on T. cystophora swimming speed or turning behavior. Feeding rates of T. cystophora on the copepod D. oculata increase rapidly with copepod density, and maximum rates are not achieved until the high densities associated with swarms are reached. It seems doubtful that these small medusae could survive without their ability to encounter and exploit these dense swarms of copepods.

[1]  J. Peterson,et al.  The role of photoreception in the swarming behavior of the copepod Dioithona oculata , 1995 .

[2]  W. Greve.  The “Meteor Planktonküvette”: A device for the maintenance of macrozooplankton aboard ships , 1975 .

[3]  M. Arai.  Interactions of fish and pelagic coelenterates , 1988 .

[4]  D. Ritz,et al.  Effect of prey density and hunger state on capture of krill, Nyctiphanes australis Sars, by Australian salmon, Arripis trutta (Bloch & Schneider) , 1984 .

[5]  E. Buskey.  Energetic costs of swarming behavior for the copepod Dioithona oculata , 1998 .

[6]  R. C. Miller.  The Significance of the Gregarious Habit , 1922 .

[7]  J. Peterson,et al.  he swarming behavior of the copepod Dioithona oculata: In situ and laboratory studies , 1996 .

[8]  Michel Treisman,et al.  Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. I. Models for concealment and evasion , 1975, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  Scott E. Stewart,et al.  Field behavior of tripedalia cystophora (class cubozoa) , 1996 .

[10]  W. Hamner.  Design developments in the planktonkreisel, a plankton aquarium for ships at sea , 1990 .

[11]  C. Greene.  Planktivore functional groups and patterns of prey selection in pelagic communities , 1985 .

[12]  E. Charnov.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[13]  K. Bailey,et al.  A laboratory study of predation by Aurelia aurita on larval herring (Clupea harengus): Experimental observations compared with model predictions , 1983 .

[14]  E. Buskey.  Components of mating behavior in planktonic copepods , 1998 .

[15]  G. Matsumoto.  Observations on the anatomy and behavior of the cubozoan Carybdea rastonni Haacke , 1995 .

[16]  H. Ueda,et al.  Underwater observations on copepod swarms in temperate and subtropical waters , 1983 .

[17]  M. Arai,et al.  Attraction of Aurelia and Aequorea to prey , 1991, Hydrobiologia.

[18]  W. Hamner,et al.  Copepod swarms: Attributes and role in coral reef ecosystems , 1979 .

[19]  A. Burr,et al.  Photomovement Behavior in Simple Invertebrates , 1984 .

[20]  I. Vine.  Detection of prey flocks by predators. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  M. McFall-Ngai.  Crypsis in the Pelagic Environment , 1990 .

[22]  Masao Yoshida,et al.  Fine structure of complex ocelli of a cubomedusan, Tamoya bursaria Haeckel , 1976, Cell and Tissue Research.

[23]  J. Fornshell,et al.  Population structure and swarm formation of the cyclopoid copepod Dioithona oculata near mangrove cays , 1991 .