Data Networks are Lightly Utilized, and Will Stay That Way

The popular press often extolls packet networks as much more efficient than switched voice networks in utilizing transmission lines. This impression is reinforced by the delays experienced on the Internet and the famous graphs for traffic patterns through the major exchange points on the Internet, which suggest that networks are running at full capacity. This paper shows the popular impression is incorrect; data networks are very lightly utilized compared to the telephone network. Even the backbones of the Internet are run at lower fractions (10% to 15%) of their capacity than the switched voice network (which operates at over 30% of capacity on average). Private line networks are utilized far less intensively (at 3% to 5%). Further, this situation is likely to persist. The low utilization of data networks compared to voice phone networks is not a symptom of waste. It comes from different patterns of use, lumpy capacity of transmission facilities, and the high growth rate of the industry.

[1]  Andrew M. Odlyzko.  The Internet and other networks: utilization rates and their implications , 2000, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[2]  Andrew Odlyzko.  The current state and likely evolution of the Internet , 1999, Seamless Interconnection for Universal Services. Global Telecommunications Conference. GLOBECOM'99. (Cat. No.99CH37042).

[3]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Dynamic behavior of differential pricing and quality of service options for the Internet , 1998, ICE '98.

[4]  Walter Willinger,et al.  On the self-similar nature of Ethernet traffic , 1993, SIGCOMM '93.

[5]  R. Wilder,et al.  Wide-area Internet traffic patterns and characteristics , 1997, IEEE Netw..

[6]  Andrew Odlyzko.  Data networks are mostly empty and for good reason , 1999 .

[7]  James P. Cavanagh.  Frame relay applications: business and technology case studies , 1997 .

[8]  George C. Polyzos,et al.  Traffic characteristics of the T1 NSFNET backbone , 1993, IEEE INFOCOM '93 The Conference on Computer Communications, Proceedings.

[9]  Brett A. Leida.  A cost model of Internet service providers : implications for Internet telephony and yield management , 1998 .

[10]  FeldmannA.,et al.  The changing nature of network traffic , 1998 .

[11]  Odlyzko Andrew.  The Economics of the Internet: Utility, Utilization, Pricing, and Quality of Service , 1999 .

[12]  Murad S. Taqqu,et al.  On the Self-Similar Nature of Ethernet Traffic , 1993, SIGCOMM.

[13]  G. Staple.  Telegeography : global telecommunications traffic statistics and commentary , 1995 .

[14]  Andrew M. Odlyzko,et al.  The Size and Growth Rate of the Internet , 1999, First Monday.

[15]  Srinivasan Keshav,et al.  An Engineering Approach to Computer Networking: ATM Networks , 1996 .

[16]  Gerald R. Ash,et al.  Dynamic Routing in Telecommunications Networks , 1997 .

[17]  A. Odlyzko,et al.  Internet growth: is there a Moore's law for data traffic? , 2000 .

[18]  Leonard Kleinrock,et al.  On measured behavior of the ARPA network , 1899, AFIPS '74.

[19]  Anja Feldmann,et al.  The changing nature of network traffic: scaling phenomena , 1998, CCRV.

[20]  L. McKnight,et al.  Internet Telephony: Costs, Pricing, and Policy , 1998 .

[21]  Harry Rudin,et al.  Challenges to the network: Telecoms and the internet , 1997, Comput. Networks ISDN Syst..