GIS based morphometric evaluation of Chimmini and Mupily watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Thrissur District, Kerala, India

GIS and Remote Sensing have proved to be an indispensible tool in morphometric analysis. The identification of morphometric properties based on a geographic information system (GIS) was carried out in two watersheds in the Thrissur district of Kerala, India. These watersheds are parts of Western Ghats, which is an ecologically sensitive area. Quantitative geomorphometric analysis was carried out for the Chimmini and Mupily watersheds independently by estimating their (a) linear aspects like stream number, stream order, stream length, mean stream length, stream length ratio, bifurcation ratio, length of overland flow, drainage pattern (b) aerial aspects like circulatory ratio, elongation ratio, drainage density and (c) relief aspects like basin relief, relief ratio, relative relief and ruggedness number. The drainage areas of Chimmini and Mupily watersheds are 140 and 122 km2 respectively and show patterns of dendritic to sub-dendritic drainage. The Chimmini watershed was classified as a sixth order drainage basin, whereas Mupily watershed was classified as a fifth order basin. The stream order of the basin was predominantly controlled by physiographic and structural conditions. The increase in the stream length ratio from lower to higher order suggests that the study area has reached a mature geomorphic stage. The development of stream segments is affected by rainfall and local lithology of the watersheds. The slope of both watersheds varied from 0° to 50° and 0° to 42° respectively and the slope variation is chiefly controlled by the local geology and erosion cycles. Moreover, these studies are useful for planning rain water harvesting and watershed management.

[1]  R. Horton Drainage‐basin characteristics , 1932 .

[2]  S. A. Schumm,et al.  B. Sediment Sources and Drainage-Basin Character­ istics in Upper Cheyenne River Basin , 1961 .

[3]  Kenneth G. V. Smith,et al.  Standards for grading texture of erosional topography , 1950 .

[4]  L. Mesa,et al.  Morphometric analysis of a subtropical Andean basin (Tucumán, Argentina) , 2006 .

[5]  Stanley A. Schumm,et al.  Sinuosity of Alluvial Rivers on the Great Plains , 1963 .

[6]  S. Schumm,et al.  Hydrology of the upper Cheyenne River basin: Part A. Hydrology of stock-water reservoirs in upper Cheyenne River basin; Part B. Sediment sources and drainage-basin characteristics in upper Cheyenne River basin , 1961 .

[7]  A. N. Strahler Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channel networks , 1964 .

[8]  R. Horton EROSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF STREAMS AND THEIR DRAINAGE BASINS; HYDROPHYSICAL APPROACH TO QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY , 1945 .

[9]  S. Schumm EVOLUTION OF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND SLOPES IN BADLANDS AT PERTH AMBOY, NEW JERSEY , 1956 .

[10]  N. S. Magesh,et al.  Morphometric evaluation of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India: a GIS approach , 2011 .

[11]  M. Morisawa,et al.  Rivers: Form and process , 1985 .

[12]  Shakeel Ahmed,et al.  The significance of morphometric analysis for obtaining groundwater potential zones in a structurally controlled terrain , 2005 .

[13]  A. N. Strahler Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology , 1957 .

[14]  P. Pizor Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment. , 1987 .

[15]  G. Dury,et al.  Essays in geomorphology , 1966 .