Diagnostic accuracy of conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut-off values in older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective To review the diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer testing in older patients (>50 years) with suspected venous thromboembolism, using conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut-off values. Design Systematic review and bivariate random effects meta-analysis. Data sources We searched Medline and Embase for studies published before 21 June 2012 and we contacted the authors of primary studies. Study selection Primary studies that enrolled older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism in whom D-dimer testing, using both conventional (500 µg/L) and age adjusted (age×10 µg/L) cut-off values, and reference testing were performed. For patients with a non-high clinical probability, 2×2 tables were reconstructed and stratified by age category and applied D-dimer cut-off level. Results 13 cohorts including 12 497 patients with a non-high clinical probability were included in the meta-analysis. The specificity of the conventional cut-off value decreased with increasing age, from 57.6% (95% confidence interval 51.4% to 63.6%) in patients aged 51-60 years to 39.4% (33.5% to 45.6%) in those aged 61-70, 24.5% (20.0% to 29.7% in those aged 71-80, and 14.7% (11.3% to 18.6%) in those aged >80. Age adjusted cut-off values revealed higher specificities over all age categories: 62.3% (56.2% to 68.0%), 49.5% (43.2% to 55.8%), 44.2% (38.0% to 50.5%), and 35.2% (29.4% to 41.5%), respectively. Sensitivities of the age adjusted cut-off remained above 97% in all age categories. Conclusions The application of age adjusted cut-off values for D-dimer tests substantially increases specificity without modifying sensitivity, thereby improving the clinical utility of D-dimer testing in patients aged 50 or more with a non-high clinical probability.

[1]  John A. Heit,et al.  The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism , 2003, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[2]  K. Moons,et al.  From accuracy to patient outcome and cost-effectiveness evaluations of diagnostic tests and biomarkers: an exemplary modelling study , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[3]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  Systematic reviews of studies quantifying the accuracy of diagnostic tests and markers. , 2012, Clinical chemistry.

[4]  C. Legnani,et al.  Using an age-dependent D-dimer cut-off value increases the number of older patients in whom deep vein thrombosis can be safely excluded , 2012, Haematologica.

[5]  J. Kline,et al.  Performance of age‐adjusted D‐dimer cut‐off to rule out pulmonary embolism , 2012, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[6]  K. Moons,et al.  Validation of two age dependent D-dimer cut-off values for exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in suspected elderly patients in primary care: retrospective, cross sectional, diagnostic analysis , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  J. Kline,et al.  Prospective study of the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy among patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. , 2012, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[8]  J. Kline,et al.  European and American suspected and confirmed pulmonary embolism populations: comparison and analysis , 2012, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[9]  H. Büller,et al.  The combination of four different clinical decision rules and an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off increases the number of patients in whom acute pulmonary embolism can safely be excluded , 2011, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[10]  Lotty Hooft,et al.  Search filters to identify geriatric medicine in Medline , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[11]  H. Allore,et al.  The relationship between intervening hospitalizations and transitions between frailty states. , 2011, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[12]  Susan Mallett,et al.  QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  Johannes B. Reitsma,et al.  Clinical Decision Rules for Excluding Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-analysis , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  Pieter W Kamphuisen,et al.  Performance of 4 Clinical Decision Rules in the Diagnostic Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  H. Bounameaux.  Contemporary management of pulmonary embolism: the answers to ten questions , 2010, Journal of internal medicine.

[16]  C. Legnani,et al.  Multicenter evaluation of a new quantitative highly sensitive D-dimer assay, the Hemosil D-dimer HS 500, in patients with clinically suspected venous thromboembolism. , 2010, Thrombosis research.

[17]  H. Büller,et al.  Potential of an age adjusted D-dimer cut-off value to improve the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in older patients: a retrospective analysis of three large cohorts , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  G. Rinkel,et al.  Decision analysis to complete diagnostic research by closing the gap between test characteristics and cost-effectiveness. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  Pierre Durieux,et al.  A computerized handheld decision-support system to improve pulmonary embolism diagnosis: a randomized trial. , 2009, Annals of internal medicine.

[20]  K J M Janssen,et al.  Excluding venous thromboembolism using point of care D-dimer tests in outpatients: a diagnostic meta-analysis , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  R. Schutgens,et al.  An age‐adapted approach for the use of D‐dimers in the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis , 2009, American journal of hematology.

[22]  P. Royston,et al.  Prognosis and prognostic research: application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practice , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  H. Büller,et al.  Serial 2-point ultrasonography plus D-dimer vs whole-leg color-coded Doppler ultrasonography for diagnosing suspected symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: a randomized controlled trial. , 2008, JAMA.

[24]  V. Gerdes,et al.  The importance of clinical probability assessment in interpreting a normal d-dimer in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. , 2008, Chest.

[25]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Studies: A Comparison of Random Intercept, Normal-Normal, and Binomial-Normal Bivariate Summary ROC Approaches , 2008, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[26]  J. Kline,et al.  Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule‐out criteria , 2008, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[27]  T. Perneger,et al.  Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by multidetector CT alone or combined with venous ultrasonography of the leg: a randomised non-inferiority trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[28]  G. Gal,et al.  Influence of age on the cost‐effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for suspected pulmonary embolism , 2007, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[29]  P. Ockelford,et al.  D‐dimer concentration increases with age reducing the clinical value of the D‐dimer assay in the elderly , 2007, Internal medicine journal.

[30]  P. Wells.  Integrated strategies for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism , 2007, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[31]  H R Büller,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of D‐dimer test for exclusion of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review , 2007, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[32]  A. Furber,et al.  Appropriateness of Diagnostic Management and Outcomes of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[33]  A. Evans,et al.  Translating Clinical Research into Clinical Practice: Impact of Using Prediction Rules To Make Decisions , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[34]  Arnaud Perrier,et al.  Prediction of Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department: The Revised Geneva Score , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[35]  Pieter W Kamphuisen,et al.  Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. , 2006, JAMA.

[36]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[37]  A. Turpie.  Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  Karel G M Moons,et al.  Ruling out deep venous thrombosis in primary care , 2005, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[39]  H. Bounameaux,et al.  The Challenge of Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Elderly Patients: Influence of Age on Commonly Used Diagnostic Tests and Strategies , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[40]  R. Schutgens,et al.  Reduced efficacy of clinical probability score and d‐dimer assay in elderly subjects suspected of having deep vein thrombosis , 2005, British journal of haematology.

[41]  J. Cornuz,et al.  Clinical usefulness of D-dimer depending on clinical probability and cutoff value in outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[42]  M. Siadaty,et al.  D-dimer testing for deep venous thrombosis: a metaanalysis. , 2004, Clinical chemistry.

[43]  William A Ghali,et al.  d-Dimer for the Exclusion of Acute Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[44]  J. Douketis,et al.  A Diagnostic Strategy Involving a Quantitative Latex d-Dimer Assay Reliably Excludes Deep Venous Thrombosis , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[45]  M. Pruijm,et al.  Combination of a Normal D-Dimer Concentration and a Non-High Pretest Clinical Probability Score Is a Safe Strategy to Exclude Deep Venous Thrombosis , 2003, Circulation.

[46]  G. Kovacs,et al.  Excluding Pulmonary Embolism at the Bedside without Diagnostic Imaging: Management of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Presenting to the Emergency Department by Using a Simple Clinical Model and d-dimer , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[47]  P. Moerloose,et al.  Should the D-dimer Cut-off Value Be Increased in Elderly Patients Suspected of Pulmonary Embolism? , 2001, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[48]  C. del Rio,et al.  Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in the elderly: a higher D-dimer cut-off value is better? , 2001, Haematologica.

[49]  H. Bounameaux,et al.  Effects of age on the performance of common diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism. , 2000, The American journal of medicine.

[50]  M Gent,et al.  Derivation of a Simple Clinical Model to Categorize Patients Probability of Pulmonary Embolism: Increasing the Models Utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer , 2000, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[51]  C. Settegrana,et al.  Ruling Out Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis by ELISA Plasma D-Dimer Assay Versus Ultrasound in Inpatients More Than 70 Years Old , 1999, Angiology.

[52]  B. Polack,et al.  Plasma D-dimer testing improves the management of thromboembolic disease in hospitalized patients. , 1999, Thrombosis research.

[53]  D. Slosman,et al.  Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients , 1999, The Lancet.

[54]  M Gent,et al.  Use of a Clinical Model for Safe Management of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[55]  J. Bertrand,et al.  Evaluation of D-dimer ELISA Test in Elderly Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism , 1998, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[56]  D. Hosmer,et al.  A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study. , 1991, Archives of internal medicine.