Ultrasound diagnosed adenomyosis has a negative impact on successful implantation following GnRH antagonist IVF treatment.

STUDY QUESTION Does the presence of ultrasound diagnosed adenomyosis interfere with successful implantation in patients undergoing IVF treatment with GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation? SUMMARY ANSWER The presence of ultrasound diagnosed adenomyosis was associated with a significant reduction in successful implantation of good quality embryos in patients undergoing GnRH antagonist stimulation for IVF treatment (viable clinical pregnancy rate 23.6% versus 44.6%, P= 0.017). WHAT IS KNOWN AND WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS There is currently no consensus regarding the impact of adenomyosis on implantation potential. Although some studies have identified alterations in the endometrial milieu in adenomyosis patients that may impact implantation, several papers have reported no associated reproductive deficit. However, these pregnancy outcome studies have primarily investigated patients undergoing long down-regulation IVF protocols, where low levels of serum estrogen (before commencing the ovarian stimulation) may inactivate the adenomyosis and potentially negate its effect on implantation. Given that the majority of fertility clinics are now moving towards the more 'patient-friendly' antagonist protocol, where patients are not placed in a hypo-estrogen state before commencing ovarian stimulation, the question of whether adenomyosis has an impact on IVF success rates in GnRH antagonist-stimulated IVF treatment needs to be examined. DESIGN This is a retrospective cohort study of 748 patients who, between April 2010 and March 2012, underwent a screening transvaginal ultrasound to identify possible pelvic pathology before commencing their IVF treatment. From this screening group, 213 patients were eligible to be included in the study as they had no obvious underlying uterine or embryonic factors that could have interfered with successful implantation (aged ≤39 years, good quality Day 4/5 embryo for single-embryo transfer, no uterine fibroids/hydrosalpinx or endometrial polyps). PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING There were 213 patients in a private IVF unit eligible to be included in the study, with 38 patients (17.84%) having ultrasound diagnosed adenomyosis and 175 patients having no adenomyosis on the scan. Only the first treatment cycle for each patient was included. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The adenomyosis group had a viable clinical pregnancy rate of 23.6% compared with 44.6% in the non-adenomyosis group (P =0.017). However, the median maternal age and duration of infertility of the adenomyosis group was 2 years older and 4 months greater, respectively, than that of the non-adenomyosis group. A logistic regression analysis was performed to account for these differences between the two groups, with the adjusted results still showing a statistically significant decline in viable pregnancy rate in the adenomyosis group (OR = 0.408, CI = 0.181-0.922, P =0.031 when adjusting for maternal age; OR = 0.417, CI = 0.175-0.989, P =0.047 when adjusting for duration of infertility) BIAS, CONFOUNDING AND OTHER REASONS FOR CAUTION Given the retrospective nature of this study, there is risk of bias. This risk was minimized by having subjective variables such as embryo quality assessed by individuals not involved in the study, while strictly applying the pre-determined inclusion/exclusion criteria to all study participants. Furthermore, it is acknowledged that ultrasound is not a perfect test for the diagnosis of adenomyosis and, therefore, may underestimate the incidence of adenomyosis by misclassifying some patients with mild adenomyosis as not affected. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The results of this study should be representative of outcomes for any patient undergoing a GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation cycle for IVF since standard IVF treatment protocols were used. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST MSD Australia have provided us with a small amount of funding to cover our costs (including a travel grant for Dr Thalluri to present this work at a conference).

[1]  S. Bhattacharya,et al.  Adenomyosis and subfertility: a systematic review of prevalence, diagnosis, treatment and fertility outcomes. , 2012, Human reproduction update.

[2]  M. Nisolle,et al.  Cumulative pregnancy rate after ICSI-IVF in patients with colorectal endometriosis: results of a multicentre study. , 2012, Human reproduction.

[3]  P. Russell,et al.  The distribution of immune cells and macrophages in the endometrium of women with recurrent reproductive failure. II: adenomyosis and macrophages. , 2012, Journal of reproductive immunology.

[4]  M. Costello,et al.  The effect of adenomyosis on in vitro fertilisation and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection treatment outcome. , 2011, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[5]  M. Meseguer,et al.  Adenomyosis does not affect implantation, but is associated with miscarriage in patients undergoing oocyte donation. , 2011, Fertility and sterility.

[6]  Y. Choi,et al.  ASSISTED REPRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes in relation to myometrial thickness , 2011 .

[7]  L. Bonomo,et al.  Adenomyosis: from the sign to the diagnosis. Imaging, diagnostic pitfalls and differential diagnosis: a pictorial review , 2011, La radiologia medica.

[8]  P. Russell,et al.  The distribution of immune cells and macrophages in the endometrium of women with recurrent reproductive failure I: Techniques. , 2011, Journal of reproductive immunology.

[9]  A. Forman,et al.  Adenomyosis and junctional zone changes in patients with endometriosis. , 2011, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[10]  P. Russell,et al.  Adenomyosis is a potential cause of recurrent implantation failure during IVF treatment , 2011, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[11]  D. Wells,et al.  The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender. , 2011, Fertility and sterility.

[12]  V. Mijatovic,et al.  Adenomyosis has no adverse effects on IVF/ICSI outcomes in women with endometriosis treated with long-term pituitary down-regulation before IVF/ICSI. , 2010, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[13]  A. Maubon,et al.  Uterine junctional zone at magnetic resonance imaging: A predictor of in vitro fertilization implantation failure , 2010, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[14]  M. Lane,et al.  Avoidance of weekend oocyte retrievals during GnRH antagonist treatment by simple advancement or delay of hCG administration does not adversely affect IVF live birth outcomes. , 2010, Human reproduction.

[15]  I. Sekine,et al.  Changes in tissue inflammation, angiogenesis and apoptosis in endometriosis, adenomyosis and uterine myoma after GnRH agonist therapy. , 2010, Human reproduction.

[16]  A. Kaunitz,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review and metaanalysis. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  M. Eijkemans,et al.  Why do couples drop-out from IVF treatment? A prospective cohort study. , 2008, Human reproduction.

[18]  A. Ziogas,et al.  Adenomyosis and endometriosis in the California Teachers Study. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[19]  P. Huppert,et al.  Adenomyosis as a disorder of the early and late human reproductive period. , 2007, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[20]  P. Piver [Uterine factors limiting ART coverage]. , 2005, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.

[21]  P. Vandekerckhove,et al.  Investigation and current management of recurrent IVF treatment failure in the UK , 2005, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[22]  Klinikum Darmstadt Adenomyosis in endometriosis—prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging , 2005 .

[23]  Hsin‐Fu Chen,et al.  Decreased expression of killer cell inhibitory receptors on natural killer cells in eutopic endometrium in women with adenomyosis. , 2004, Human reproduction.

[24]  B. Napolitano,et al.  Increased seminal plasma lead levels adversely affect the fertility potential of sperm in IVF. , 2003, Human reproduction.

[25]  J. Fukuda,et al.  Retrospectively analysis of the fertility of adenomyosis and the outcome of adenomyosis complicated pregnancy in in vitro fertilization patients , 2002 .

[26]  J. Remohi,et al.  Impact of ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis on recipients of sibling oocytes. , 2001 .

[27]  A. Ferenczy Pathophysiology of adenomyosis. , 1998, Human reproduction update.

[28]  J. Brosens,et al.  Endovaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri: identifying the predictive characteristics , 1995, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.