Trust and Risk Perception in Western Europe: A Cross‐National Study

The relationship between trust and risk perception was investigated, within and across four European countries (Sweden, Spain, United Kingdom, and France). Survey data were collected in 1996; total number of respondents was approximately 1,000 (United Kingdom and Spain), 1,350 (France), and 2,050 (Sweden). Trust was a significant predictor of perceived risk within countries, but the strength of the relationship varied from weak (Spain and France) to moderate (United Kingdom and Sweden). General trust was also a significant source of variation in perceived risk among countries, but much of the variation in perceived risk remained unexplained. Correlations between trust and risk perception also varied depending on the type of risk (i.e., nuclear risks were more influenced by trust) and trust measure (i.e., general trust explained perceived risk better than specific trust). It is concluded that trust may be an element in models explaining risk perception, but it is not as powerful as often argued in the risk perception literature.

[1]  Lennart Sjöberg,et al.  Attitudes toward technology and risk: Going beyond what is immediately given , 2002 .

[2]  L Sjöberg,et al.  Limits of Knowledge and the Limited Importance of Trust , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  M. Siegrist.  The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  O. Listhaug,et al.  Confidence in Political and Private Institutions , 1998 .

[7]  R Shepherd,et al.  What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. , 1996, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  A Biel,et al.  Risk perception and the location of a repository for spent nuclear fuel. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[9]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[10]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Trust as a Determinant of Opposition to a High‐Level Radioactive Waste Repository: Analysis of a Structural Model , 1992 .

[11]  J V Mitchell,et al.  Perception of risk and credibility at toxic sites. , 1992, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  W. Hendee.  The decline of deference: the political context of risk communication. , 1991, Investigative radiology.

[13]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[14]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[15]  N. Luhmann.  Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives , 2000 .

[16]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Trust in organizations: A conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of controls. , 1996 .

[17]  M. Poumadère.  Enjeux de la communication publique des risques pour la santé et l'environnement , 1995 .

[18]  O. Listhaug.  The Dynamics of Trust in Politicians , 1995 .

[19]  David A. Bella,et al.  Technocracy and trust: nuclear waste controversy , 1988 .

[20]  Paul Horst,et al.  Psychological measurement and prediction , 1966 .