Born globals, the choice of globalization strategy, and the market's perception of performance

This paper analyzes which characteristics of born global firms determine their choice for international entry mode. Using a logistic regression analysis, we study 124 newly public firms in the United States that undertake 261 international joint ventures or international acquisitions within the first 6 years of their founding. We find that the market responds positively to announcements of international expansions by born global firms, and that larger, more profitable, and more liquid firms have a higher propensity to engage in joint ventures rather than acquisitions. We also find that the market favors firms that announce joint ventures, rewarding them with significantly positive abnormal returns. Furthermore, while we find that cultural similarity affects mode choice, it does not affect the market's reaction to the announcements.

[1]  Bernard Yeung,et al.  Why Investors Value Multinationality , 1993 .

[2]  B. Kogut,et al.  Technological capabilities and Japanese foreign direct investment in the United States , 1991 .

[3]  Paul H. Schultz,et al.  Do the individuals closest to internet firms believe they are overvalued , 2001 .

[4]  J. H. Mulherin,et al.  Comparing Acquisitions and Divestitures , 2000 .

[5]  D. Lei.  Strategies for global competition , 1989 .

[6]  Paul Harrison,et al.  Does Multinationality Matter? Evidence of Value Destruction in U.S. Multinational Corporations , 2000 .

[7]  Alex Rialp,et al.  The Born-Global Phenomenon: A Comparative Case Study Research , 2005 .

[8]  Violina P. Rindova,et al.  Assets and Actions: Firm-Specific Factors in the Internationalization of U.S. Internet Firms , 2001 .

[9]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[10]  J. Madura,et al.  Going public to pursue acquisitions , 2007 .

[11]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers , 1999 .

[12]  Bernard Yeung,et al.  Internalization : An event study test , 1992 .

[13]  G. Knight,et al.  Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm , 2004 .

[14]  R. McNaughton,et al.  The Internationalization of Internet-Enabled Entrepreneurial Firms: Evidence from Europe and North America , 2009 .

[15]  Jeff Madura,et al.  Operating characteristics, risk, and performance of born‐global firms , 2006 .

[16]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Ownership-Based Entry Mode Strategies and International Performance , 1994 .

[17]  Benjamin M. Oviatt,et al.  How New Ventures Exploit Trade-Offs Among International Risk Factors: Lessons For The Accelerated Internationization Of The 21St Century , 2000 .

[18]  Jerold B. Warner,et al.  Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies , 1985 .

[19]  Sabine Reddy,et al.  The choice between mergers/acquisitions and joint ventures : The case of Japanese investors in the United States , 1997 .

[20]  John Joseph McCall,et al.  The Economics of Information and Uncertainty , 1982 .

[21]  S. Tamer Cavusgil,et al.  A Taxonomy of Born-global Firms , 2005 .

[22]  H. Etemad.  Internationalization of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: A Grounded Theoretical Framework and an Overview , 2009 .

[23]  Oliver Hart,et al.  Corporate Financial Structure and Managerial Incentives , 1983 .

[24]  Culture, openness, and finance , 2003 .

[25]  Peter Hwang,et al.  An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode , 1990 .

[26]  T. Madsen,et al.  The internationalization of Born Globals: An evolutionary process? , 1997 .

[27]  Ø. Moen,et al.  Small International Firms : Typology, Performance and Implications , 2005 .

[28]  H. Barkema,et al.  FOREIGN ENTRY, CULTURAL BARRIERS, AND LEARNING , 1996 .

[29]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  Do Managerial Objectives Drive Bad Acquisitions? , 1989 .

[30]  Shaomin Li,et al.  The Impact of Order and Mode of Market Entry on Profitability and Market Share , 1999 .

[31]  Chris Brewster,et al.  Flexible Working in Europe: A Review of the Evidence , 1997 .

[32]  James M. Bloodgood,et al.  The Internationalization of New High-Potential U.S. Ventures: Antecedents and Outcomes , 1996 .

[33]  Sea Jin Chang,et al.  International Expansion Strategy of Japanese Firms: Capability Building through Sequential Entry , 1995 .

[34]  R. Roll,et al.  The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers , 1986 .

[35]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  Toward a theory of international new ventures , 1994 .

[36]  M. Spence.  Efficiency and Personalization as Value Creation in Internationalizing High-Technology SMEs , 2009 .

[37]  M. Hitt,et al.  International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. , 2000 .

[38]  Mika Gabrielsson,et al.  Finance Strategies of Rapidly-Growing Finnish Smes: Born Internationals and Born Globals , 2004 .

[39]  Svante Andersson,et al.  International Activities in Small Firms: Examining Factors Influencing the Internationalization and Export Growth of Small Firms , 2009 .

[40]  Richard S. Ruback,et al.  The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence , 2002 .

[41]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[42]  R. A. Wiggins,et al.  THE USE OF ACQUISITIONS AND JOINT VENTURES BY U.S. BANKS EXPANDING ABROAD , 2006 .

[43]  David A. Griffith,et al.  The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: a meta-analysis , 2005 .

[44]  Sabine Reddy,et al.  Digestibility and asymmetric information in the choice between acquisitions and joint ventures: where’s the beef? , 2000 .

[45]  Hemant Merchant,et al.  The structure-performance relationship in international joint ventures: a comparative analysis , 2005 .

[46]  Benjamin M. Oviatt,et al.  Challenges for Internationalization Process Theory: The Case of International New Ventures , 1997 .

[47]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment and the Sourcing of Technological Advantage: Evidence from the Biotechnology Industry , 1997 .

[48]  René M. Stulz,et al.  Firm size and the gains from acquisitions , 2004 .

[49]  Ø. Moen,et al.  Born Global or Gradual Global? Examining the Export Behavior of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises , 2002 .

[50]  S. Balakrishnan,et al.  Information asymmetry, adverse selection and joint-ventures* Theory and evidence , 1993 .

[51]  Michael C. Jensen,et al.  The market for corporate control , 1983 .

[52]  A. Tschoegl,et al.  Who owns the major US subsidiaries of foreign banks?: A note , 2004 .

[53]  Peter S. Davis,et al.  Internationalization of Born Global and Gradual Globalizing Firms: The Impact of the Manager , 2000 .

[54]  Niron Hashai,et al.  Gradually Internationalizing ‘Born Global’ Firms: An Oxymoron? , 2004 .