Protection of the side of the head.

The side of the head is a frequent impact site for pedal cyclists, motorcyclists, and industrial workers. It is vulnerable to impact, yet many helmet standards do not have impact tests at the side of the helmet. Laboratory impact tests should reproduce the phenomena in real impacts, but usually they do not allow the headform to rotate, or ignore the effect of the neck on the motion of the head. The authors designed a linkage, simulating the flexibility of the neck, for use with anthropomorphic dummies in helmet testing. Impacts at the side of the helmet, normal to the helmet surface, were made with flat and hemispherical strikers. Head rotation during impacts caused the impact site to move, in some cases to below the level protected by the helmet. The peak angular head acceleration correlated with the peak linear accelerations. Neck flexibility means that helmets can protect the head from higher kinetic energy impacts than those specified in standards using immovable headforms or impact anvils. The load spreading efficiency of polypropylene foam, used in soft shell bicycle helmets, is better than that of polystyrene foam. The authors conclude that the side of the head can be protected by a suitable helmet design.

[1]  N. J. Mills,et al.  The Effect of Water Immersion on the Mechanical Properties of Polystyrene Bead Foam Used in Soft Shell Cycle Helmets , 1994 .

[2]  David R. Thom,et al.  MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT CAUSE FACTORS AND IDENTIFICATION OF COUNTERMEASURES. VOLUME II: APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA , 1980 .

[3]  P. R. Stupak,et al.  The Effect of Bead Fusion on the Energy Absorption of Polystyrene Foam. Part I: Fracture Toughness , 1991 .

[4]  Alvah C. Bittner,et al.  The Effect of Mass Distribution Parameters on Head/Neck Dynamic Response , 1986 .

[5]  A Cunningham,et al.  Low density cellular plastics : physical basis of behaviour , 1994 .

[6]  Thomas A. Gennarelli,et al.  Directional Dependence of Axonal Brain Injury due to Centroidal and Non-Centroidal Acceleration , 1987 .

[7]  A. Gilchrist,et al.  Modelling of the impact response of motorcycle helmets , 1994 .

[8]  Dietmar Otte,et al.  Technical demands on safety in the design of crash helmets for biomechanical analysis of real accident situations , 1991 .

[9]  C. Got,et al.  Relationship between some biomechanical and dimensional characteristics of the skull and the risk of cerebral injuries , 1986 .

[10]  Alan M. Nahum,et al.  A study of impacts to the lateral protected and unprotected head , 1981 .

[11]  William H. Muzzy,et al.  Comparison of Human and Hybrid III Head and Neck Dynamic Response , 1986 .

[12]  Claude Tarriere,et al.  Methodological Aspects of an Experimental Research on Cerebral Tolerance on the Basis of Boxers' Training Fights , 1987 .

[13]  P. R. Stupak,et al.  The Effect of Bead Fusion on the Energy Absorption of Polystyrene Foam. Part II: Energy Absorption , 1991 .

[14]  A. Gilchrist,et al.  Motorcycle helmet load spreading performance for impacts into rigid and deformable objects , 1991 .

[15]  M Williams.  Evaluation of the penetration test for bicyclists' helmets: comparative performance of hard shell and foam helmets. , 1990, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  James H. McElhaney,et al.  Handbook of human tolerance , 1976 .

[17]  Ronald W. Palmer.  SPH-4 Aircrew Helmet Impact Protection Improvements 1970-1990 , 1991 .

[18]  A. Gilchrist,et al.  Industrial head injuries and the performance of helmets , 1995 .