The influence of female age on the cumulative live-birth rate of fresh cycles and subsequent frozen cycles using vitrified blastocysts in hyper-responders.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. Farquhar,et al. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[2] M. Roque. Freeze-all policy: is it time for that? , 2015, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.
[3] R. Cercas,et al. Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: Impact of age on the results , 2015, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.
[4] Chun-Chia Huang,et al. Effects of reactive oxygen species levels in prepared culture media on embryo development: a comparison of two media. , 2014, Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology.
[5] E. Sullivan,et al. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study. , 2014, Human reproduction.
[6] B. Vollenhoven,et al. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence. , 2014, Human reproduction update.
[7] V. Goossens,et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHRE†. , 2014, Human reproduction.
[8] S. Daneshmand,et al. Freeze-all can be a superior therapy to another fresh cycle in patients with prior fresh blastocyst implantation failure. , 2014, Reproductive biomedicine online.
[9] S. Mastenbroek,et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos and its contribution to in vitro fertilization success rates. , 2014, Fertility and sterility.
[10] M. Mainigi,et al. Why we should transfer frozen instead of fresh embryos: the translational rationale. , 2014, Fertility and sterility.
[11] K. Barnhart. Introduction: are we ready to eliminate the transfer of fresh embryos in in vitro fertilization? , 2014, Fertility and sterility.
[12] S. Daneshmand,et al. Clinical rationale for cryopreservation of entire embryo cohorts in lieu of fresh transfer. , 2014, Fertility and sterility.
[13] P. Patrizio,et al. Fresh transfer outcome predicts the success of a subsequent frozen transfer utilizing blastocysts of the same cohort. , 2014, Reproductive biomedicine online.
[14] O. Bolonduro,et al. Cumulative live birth rate and assisted reproduction: impact of female age and transfer day , 2014, Facts, views & vision in ObGyn.
[15] H. Fatemi,et al. Implantation in assisted reproduction: a look at endometrial receptivity. , 2013, Reproductive biomedicine online.
[16] E. A. Rybak,et al. Premature formation of nucleolar channel systems indicates advanced endometrial maturation following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation , 2013 .
[17] Shee-Uan Chen,et al. Blastocyst morphology score as an indicator of embryo competence for women aged younger than 38 years in in vitro fertilization cycles. , 2013, Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology.
[18] O. Ozturk,et al. Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[19] K. Aittomäki,et al. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, Human reproduction update.
[20] M. Hacker,et al. The cumulative probability of liveborn multiples after in vitro fertilization: a cohort study of more than 10,000 women. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.
[21] Matheus Roque,et al. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.
[22] S. Bhattacharya,et al. Elective frozen replacement cycles for all: ready for prime time? , 2013, Human reproduction.
[23] Morton B. Brown,et al. Cumulative birth rates with linked assisted reproductive technology cycles , 2012 .
[24] D. Gook,et al. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. , 2012, Human reproduction update.
[25] S. Bhattacharya,et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Fertility and sterility.
[26] K. Barnhart,et al. Ovarian Stimulation and Low Birth Weight in Newborns Conceived Through In Vitro Fertilization , 2011, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[27] Q F Cai,et al. Factors predicting the cumulative outcome of IVF/ICSI treatment: a multivariable analysis of 2450 patients. , 2011, Human reproduction.
[28] S. Daneshmand,et al. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. , 2011, Fertility and sterility.
[29] C. Simón,et al. Cumulative live-birth rates per total number of embryos needed to reach newborn in consecutive in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles: a new approach to measuring the likelihood of IVF success. , 2011, Fertility and sterility.
[30] M. Ashrafi,et al. The factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle. , 2011, Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology.
[31] K. Barnhart,et al. Perinatal morbidity after in vitro fertilization is lower with frozen embryo transfer. , 2011, Fertility and sterility.
[32] V. Moragianni,et al. Cumulative live-birth rates after assisted reproductive technology , 2010, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.
[33] N. Desai,et al. Slow freezing, vitrification and ultra-rapid freezing of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2010, Reproductive biomedicine online.
[34] C. Venetis,et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: which one is better? , 2009, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.
[35] S. Corson. Cumulative Live-birth Rates after In Vitro Fertilization , 2009 .
[36] D. Molbo,et al. Prospective longitudinal cohort study on cumulative 5-year delivery and adoption rates among 1338 couples initiating infertility treatment. , 2008, Human reproduction.
[37] C. Venetis,et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.
[38] V. Goossens,et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. , 2008, Human reproduction.
[39] F. Broekmans,et al. Female reproductive ageing: current knowledge and future trends , 2007, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.
[40] Shee-Uan Chen,et al. Successful pregnancy following blastocyst cryopreservation using super-cooling ultra-rapid vitrification. , 2005, Human reproduction.
[41] D. De Neubourg,et al. Cryopreservation as a tool to reduce multiple birth. , 2003, Reproductive biomedicine online.