Calculation of Investment Portfolios with Risk Free Borrowing and Lending

We consider the problem of portfolio selection for a risk averse investor wishing to allocate his resources among several investment opportunities in order to maximize the expected utility of final wealth. The calculation of the optimal investment proportions generally requires the solution of a stochastic program whose dimension is the number of risky investments. The computations are simplified dramatically when there is a risk free asset and the investment returns are jointly normally distributed. In this case Tobin has shown that the investment proportions in the risky assets are independent of the utility function and Lintner has shown that these proportions may be obtained from the solution of a fractional program. It is shown under mild hypotheses that the fractional program has a pseudo-concave objective and that the program always has a unique solution. The solution may be sought in several ways, perhaps moat efficiently via Lemke's algorithm applied to a linear complementarity problem. The optimal investment proportions in all assets may be found by solving a stochastic program having one random variable and one decision variable via a search technique. Data on the major pooled Canadian equity pension funds were used to provide an empirical test of the suggested solution approach. Five common classes of utility functions were utilised with varying parameter values. For each class there are smooth curves that related the investment in the risk free asset to the parameters of the utility function. The investor is more risk averse when faced with quarterly data.

[1]  R. Freund THE INTRODUCTION OF RISK INTO A PROGRAMMING MODEL , 1956 .

[2]  J. Tobin Liquidity Preference as Behavior towards Risk , 1958 .

[3]  A. Stuart,et al.  Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments , 1959 .

[4]  Marcel K. Richter,et al.  Cardinal Utility, Portfolio Selection and Taxation , 1960 .

[5]  J. Pratt RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. , 1964 .

[6]  Calyampudi Radhakrishna Rao,et al.  Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications , 1967 .

[7]  C. E. Lemke,et al.  Bimatrix Equilibrium Points and Mathematical Programming , 1965 .

[8]  J. Lintner THE VALUATION OF RISK ASSETS AND THE SELECTION OF RISKY INVESTMENTS IN STOCK PORTFOLIOS AND CAPITAL BUDGETS , 1965 .

[9]  P. Samuelson General Proof that Diversification Pays , 1967, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[10]  Gordon B. Pye Portfolio selection and security prices , 1967 .

[11]  H. Levy,et al.  Efficiency analysis of choices involving risk , 1969 .

[12]  Risk Aversion over Time and a Capital-Budgeting Problem , 1969 .

[13]  P. Samuelson The Fundamental Approximation Theorem of Portfolio Analysis in terms of Means, Variances and Higher Moments , 1970 .

[14]  E. M. L. Beale,et al.  Nonlinear Programming: A Unified Approach. , 1970 .

[15]  H. Markowitz Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments , 1971 .

[16]  B. Eaves The Linear Complementarity Problem , 1971 .

[17]  Katta G. Murty,et al.  On the number of solutions to the complementarity problem and spanning properties of complementary cones , 1972 .

[18]  William T. Ziemba,et al.  Solving Nonlinear Programming Problems with Stochastic Objective Functions , 1972, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[19]  John S. Chipman,et al.  The Ordering of Portfolios in Terms of Mean and Variance , 1973 .

[20]  O. Mangasarian CONVEXITY, PSEUDO-CONVEXITY AND QUASI-CONVEXITY OF COMPOSITE FUNCTIONS , 1975 .